Queer caregiving with older adults: A scoping review of the lived experiences of LGBTQ+ family and friend caregivers

Steven Hall , Natasha Hubbard Murdoch , Darien Dyck , Adam Stacey
{"title":"Queer caregiving with older adults: A scoping review of the lived experiences of LGBTQ+ family and friend caregivers","authors":"Steven Hall ,&nbsp;Natasha Hubbard Murdoch ,&nbsp;Darien Dyck ,&nbsp;Adam Stacey","doi":"10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A growing LGBTQ+ population is accompanied by an increasing number of LGBTQ+ caregivers of older adults. However, the experiences and perspectives of LGBTQ+ caregivers remain poorly understood within health and social systems. Caregiving research has traditionally focused on heterosexual caregivers, often overlooking the distinct experiences of LGBTQ+ caregivers. This scoping review compiles literature that highlights the unique challenges, needs, and support systems required by LGBTQ+ caregivers. We used Arksey &amp; O'Malley's five-step iterative scoping review methodology and identified relevant studies through a search of three electronic databases conducted on May 11, 2023. A total of 57 items were included in this review: 13 quantitative studies, 22 qualitative studies, 6 mixed methods studies, 2 scoping reviews, 1 literature review, and 13 grey literature records. Through a thematic synthesis, we identified five major themes: LGBTQ+ caregivers are highly active in providing informal care; queer caregiving has unique complexities; LGBTQ+ caregivers want to feel recognized and understood; LGBTQ+ caregivers are at high risk of becoming overwhelmed; and challenges navigating heteronormative health systems. This scoping review highlights the distinct experiences of LGBTQ+ family and friend caregivers and their specific support needs within their caregiving role. Findings from this review highlight the importance of healthcare professionals receiving comprehensive LGBTQ+ focused education to better understand and support LGBTQ+ caregivers. We emphasize the need of LGBTQ+ caregivers to feel recognized and understood within health systems, highlighting that this population of caregivers is at higher risk of becoming overwhelmed. Further research is needed to address the gaps in knowledge, provide effective interventions, and draft policies to support LGBTQ+ caregivers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74826,"journal":{"name":"Social sciences & humanities open","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 101324"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social sciences & humanities open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291125000518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A growing LGBTQ+ population is accompanied by an increasing number of LGBTQ+ caregivers of older adults. However, the experiences and perspectives of LGBTQ+ caregivers remain poorly understood within health and social systems. Caregiving research has traditionally focused on heterosexual caregivers, often overlooking the distinct experiences of LGBTQ+ caregivers. This scoping review compiles literature that highlights the unique challenges, needs, and support systems required by LGBTQ+ caregivers. We used Arksey & O'Malley's five-step iterative scoping review methodology and identified relevant studies through a search of three electronic databases conducted on May 11, 2023. A total of 57 items were included in this review: 13 quantitative studies, 22 qualitative studies, 6 mixed methods studies, 2 scoping reviews, 1 literature review, and 13 grey literature records. Through a thematic synthesis, we identified five major themes: LGBTQ+ caregivers are highly active in providing informal care; queer caregiving has unique complexities; LGBTQ+ caregivers want to feel recognized and understood; LGBTQ+ caregivers are at high risk of becoming overwhelmed; and challenges navigating heteronormative health systems. This scoping review highlights the distinct experiences of LGBTQ+ family and friend caregivers and their specific support needs within their caregiving role. Findings from this review highlight the importance of healthcare professionals receiving comprehensive LGBTQ+ focused education to better understand and support LGBTQ+ caregivers. We emphasize the need of LGBTQ+ caregivers to feel recognized and understood within health systems, highlighting that this population of caregivers is at higher risk of becoming overwhelmed. Further research is needed to address the gaps in knowledge, provide effective interventions, and draft policies to support LGBTQ+ caregivers.

Abstract Image

老年人的酷儿照顾:LGBTQ+家庭和朋友照顾者生活经历的范围审查
随着LGBTQ+人口的增长,越来越多的LGBTQ+老年人的照顾者也随之增加。然而,卫生和社会系统对LGBTQ+照护者的经历和观点仍然知之甚少。照护研究传统上关注的是异性恋照护者,往往忽视了LGBTQ+照护者的独特经历。这个范围审查汇编了文献,突出了LGBTQ+照顾者所需要的独特挑战、需求和支持系统。我们使用了Arksey &;O'Malley的五步迭代范围审查方法,并通过对2023年5月11日进行的三个电子数据库的搜索确定了相关研究。本综述共纳入57项:定量研究13项,定性研究22项,混合方法研究6项,范围综述2项,文献综述1项,灰色文献记录13项。通过主题综合,我们确定了五个主要主题:LGBTQ+护理人员在提供非正式护理方面非常活跃;照顾酷儿有着独特的复杂性;LGBTQ+的照顾者希望得到认可和理解;LGBTQ+护理人员很有可能变得不堪重负;以及如何驾驭异性恋卫生系统的挑战。这项范围审查强调了LGBTQ+家庭和朋友照顾者的独特经历以及他们在照顾角色中的特定支持需求。本综述的研究结果强调了医疗保健专业人员接受全面的LGBTQ+重点教育的重要性,以更好地理解和支持LGBTQ+护理人员。我们强调LGBTQ+护理人员需要在卫生系统中感受到被认可和理解,并强调这一护理人员群体承受不堪重负的风险更高。需要进一步的研究来解决知识差距,提供有效的干预措施,并制定政策来支持LGBTQ+照顾者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social sciences & humanities open
Social sciences & humanities open Psychology (General), Decision Sciences (General), Social Sciences (General)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
159 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信