Concept definition review: A method for studying terminology in software engineering

IF 3.8 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Sabine Molenaar, Nikita van den Berg, Fabiano Dalpiaz, Sjaak Brinkkemper
{"title":"Concept definition review: A method for studying terminology in software engineering","authors":"Sabine Molenaar,&nbsp;Nikita van den Berg,&nbsp;Fabiano Dalpiaz,&nbsp;Sjaak Brinkkemper","doi":"10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context:</h3><div>In scientific domains, definitions provide a precise description of fundamental concepts. Although the debate within the philosophy of computer science regarding the scientific nature of software engineering (SE) is inconclusive, SE researchers have laid down important steps toward treating SE as a scientific paradigm.</div></div><div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>We aim to support precise and effective communication among SE researchers and practitioners by providing a systematic process for the identification and analysis of definitions, in order to support the selection of a suitable definition for a certain use case.</div></div><div><h3>Method:</h3><div>Inspired by methods for the planning and execution of systematic literature reviews, we construct a method that is specific for concept definition reviews (CDRs). These reviews are performed whenever a research team wishes to obtain a detailed understanding of an SE concept that may have been characterized by dozens, if not hundreds, definitions.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>We built our method via two <em>design science</em> iterations. The first one focused on the concept <em>feature</em> and resulted in the definitive version of the CDR method presented in this paper. We then applied the revised method to two, related concepts: <em>quality requirement</em> and <em>non-functional requirement</em>. Besides showing the applicability of the CDR method, our results include findings regarding the characteristics and evolution of the terms.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions:</h3><div>The two applications of the CDR method highlight the existence and citation of hundreds of definitions, many of which are nearly (but not exactly) identical. We put forward our method for other researchers to shed light on the key terminology in other sub-fields of SE.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54983,"journal":{"name":"Information and Software Technology","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 107648"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Software Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924002532","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context:

In scientific domains, definitions provide a precise description of fundamental concepts. Although the debate within the philosophy of computer science regarding the scientific nature of software engineering (SE) is inconclusive, SE researchers have laid down important steps toward treating SE as a scientific paradigm.

Objective:

We aim to support precise and effective communication among SE researchers and practitioners by providing a systematic process for the identification and analysis of definitions, in order to support the selection of a suitable definition for a certain use case.

Method:

Inspired by methods for the planning and execution of systematic literature reviews, we construct a method that is specific for concept definition reviews (CDRs). These reviews are performed whenever a research team wishes to obtain a detailed understanding of an SE concept that may have been characterized by dozens, if not hundreds, definitions.

Results:

We built our method via two design science iterations. The first one focused on the concept feature and resulted in the definitive version of the CDR method presented in this paper. We then applied the revised method to two, related concepts: quality requirement and non-functional requirement. Besides showing the applicability of the CDR method, our results include findings regarding the characteristics and evolution of the terms.

Conclusions:

The two applications of the CDR method highlight the existence and citation of hundreds of definitions, many of which are nearly (but not exactly) identical. We put forward our method for other researchers to shed light on the key terminology in other sub-fields of SE.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information and Software Technology
Information and Software Technology 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
9.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Information and Software Technology is the international archival journal focusing on research and experience that contributes to the improvement of software development practices. The journal''s scope includes methods and techniques to better engineer software and manage its development. Articles submitted for review should have a clear component of software engineering or address ways to improve the engineering and management of software development. Areas covered by the journal include: • Software management, quality and metrics, • Software processes, • Software architecture, modelling, specification, design and programming • Functional and non-functional software requirements • Software testing and verification & validation • Empirical studies of all aspects of engineering and managing software development Short Communications is a new section dedicated to short papers addressing new ideas, controversial opinions, "Negative" results and much more. Read the Guide for authors for more information. The journal encourages and welcomes submissions of systematic literature studies (reviews and maps) within the scope of the journal. Information and Software Technology is the premiere outlet for systematic literature studies in software engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信