Establishment of different artificial infection method models for grass carp reovirus

IF 3.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES
Hanyue Wang , Yongming Li , Qian Wang , Bin Gui , Lanjie Liao , Zuoyan Zhu , Yaping Wang , Rong Huang , Libo He
{"title":"Establishment of different artificial infection method models for grass carp reovirus","authors":"Hanyue Wang ,&nbsp;Yongming Li ,&nbsp;Qian Wang ,&nbsp;Bin Gui ,&nbsp;Lanjie Liao ,&nbsp;Zuoyan Zhu ,&nbsp;Yaping Wang ,&nbsp;Rong Huang ,&nbsp;Libo He","doi":"10.1016/j.aquaculture.2025.742162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Grass carp reovirus (GCRV) causes hemorrhagic disease leading to substantial economic losses to the aquaculture industry of grass carp. Effective artificial virus infection methods are essential for the disease-resistant breeding programs and vaccines development. In our study, we established four distinct artificial infection methods for GCRV to identify the most effective approach for inducing infection in grass carp. These methods included feeding, gavage, immersion, and injection. Each method resulted in a similar mortality rate of approximately 80 % and induced characteristic hemorrhagic symptoms associated with GCRV infection. The viral replication patterns were consistent across all infection methods in eight examined tissues, with the intestine, brain, liver, and muscle identified as particularly susceptible to GCRV infection. Furthermore, all artificial infection methods led to significant pathological alterations in the liver and intestinal tissues. Notably, a large number of GCRV viral particles were observed in the kidneys of the infected groups but not present in the control groups. These results underscore the efficacy of the four artificial infection methods evaluated. The choice of the optimal infection method should be tailored to specific conditions. Our findings provide valuable insights for disease-resistant breeding and vaccines development, thereby contributing to the sustainability of the aquaculture industry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8375,"journal":{"name":"Aquaculture","volume":"599 ","pages":"Article 742162"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquaculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0044848625000481","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Grass carp reovirus (GCRV) causes hemorrhagic disease leading to substantial economic losses to the aquaculture industry of grass carp. Effective artificial virus infection methods are essential for the disease-resistant breeding programs and vaccines development. In our study, we established four distinct artificial infection methods for GCRV to identify the most effective approach for inducing infection in grass carp. These methods included feeding, gavage, immersion, and injection. Each method resulted in a similar mortality rate of approximately 80 % and induced characteristic hemorrhagic symptoms associated with GCRV infection. The viral replication patterns were consistent across all infection methods in eight examined tissues, with the intestine, brain, liver, and muscle identified as particularly susceptible to GCRV infection. Furthermore, all artificial infection methods led to significant pathological alterations in the liver and intestinal tissues. Notably, a large number of GCRV viral particles were observed in the kidneys of the infected groups but not present in the control groups. These results underscore the efficacy of the four artificial infection methods evaluated. The choice of the optimal infection method should be tailored to specific conditions. Our findings provide valuable insights for disease-resistant breeding and vaccines development, thereby contributing to the sustainability of the aquaculture industry.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aquaculture
Aquaculture 农林科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
17.80%
发文量
1246
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Aquaculture is an international journal for the exploration, improvement and management of all freshwater and marine food resources. It publishes novel and innovative research of world-wide interest on farming of aquatic organisms, which includes finfish, mollusks, crustaceans and aquatic plants for human consumption. Research on ornamentals is not a focus of the Journal. Aquaculture only publishes papers with a clear relevance to improving aquaculture practices or a potential application.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信