Production of MWCNTs from plastic wastes: Method selection through Multi-Criteria Decision-Making techniques

IF 5.5 3区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Prabakar P , L N Sajith , Sivagami K , Kavindra A I , Muruganandam L , Samarshi Chakraborty
{"title":"Production of MWCNTs from plastic wastes: Method selection through Multi-Criteria Decision-Making techniques","authors":"Prabakar P ,&nbsp;L N Sajith ,&nbsp;Sivagami K ,&nbsp;Kavindra A I ,&nbsp;Muruganandam L ,&nbsp;Samarshi Chakraborty","doi":"10.1016/j.jtice.2025.106000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The global challenge of plastic waste generation warrants innovative, cost-effective, sustainable, and scalable solutions. Conversion of different non-recyclable plastic waste into value-added products (waste to wealth) such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs), graphene, carbon black, etc. holds significant promise in the waste management/valorization sectors with economic viability. This study focuses on identifying the optimal method for producing multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) from plastic wastes from several popular MWCNT synthesis methods such as chemical vapor deposition, pyrolysis, spray pyrolysis, gasification, microwave-assisted pyrolysis, etc.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The authors implemented Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques. They ranked different MWCNT production methods from waste plastic based on several operational, economic, and qualitative parameters, including raw material cost, operating temperature, reaction time, pressure, production yield, and MWCNT diameter. MCDM methods like TOPSIS, Grey Relational Analysis, and Simple Additive Weighting rank different synthesis processes.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>MCDM analysis performed using subjective and objective criteria weighting concluded that gasification is the most sustainable and cost-effective method having a high assessment score above 0.9 for MWCNT production. In contrast, pyrolysis and spray pyrolysis are the least favoured options with an assessment score ranging between 0.3 to 0.6. The current research provides a clear roadmap for developing a sustainable, economically viable solution for plastic waste valorization. It also helps us to find sustainable and efficient MWCNT manufacturing techniques from non-recyclable plastic waste that have the potential to pave the way for greener sustainable waste management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers","volume":"169 ","pages":"Article 106000"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876107025000513","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The global challenge of plastic waste generation warrants innovative, cost-effective, sustainable, and scalable solutions. Conversion of different non-recyclable plastic waste into value-added products (waste to wealth) such as carbon nanotubes (CNTs), graphene, carbon black, etc. holds significant promise in the waste management/valorization sectors with economic viability. This study focuses on identifying the optimal method for producing multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) from plastic wastes from several popular MWCNT synthesis methods such as chemical vapor deposition, pyrolysis, spray pyrolysis, gasification, microwave-assisted pyrolysis, etc.

Methods

The authors implemented Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques. They ranked different MWCNT production methods from waste plastic based on several operational, economic, and qualitative parameters, including raw material cost, operating temperature, reaction time, pressure, production yield, and MWCNT diameter. MCDM methods like TOPSIS, Grey Relational Analysis, and Simple Additive Weighting rank different synthesis processes.

Findings

MCDM analysis performed using subjective and objective criteria weighting concluded that gasification is the most sustainable and cost-effective method having a high assessment score above 0.9 for MWCNT production. In contrast, pyrolysis and spray pyrolysis are the least favoured options with an assessment score ranging between 0.3 to 0.6. The current research provides a clear roadmap for developing a sustainable, economically viable solution for plastic waste valorization. It also helps us to find sustainable and efficient MWCNT manufacturing techniques from non-recyclable plastic waste that have the potential to pave the way for greener sustainable waste management.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
14.00%
发文量
362
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers (formerly known as Journal of the Chinese Institute of Chemical Engineers) publishes original works, from fundamental principles to practical applications, in the broad field of chemical engineering with special focus on three aspects: Chemical and Biomolecular Science and Technology, Energy and Environmental Science and Technology, and Materials Science and Technology. Authors should choose for their manuscript an appropriate aspect section and a few related classifications when submitting to the journal online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信