{"title":"Identifying the Important Skills and Attributes of a Practice-Based Research Supervisor Among Hospital Pharmacists","authors":"Jesslyn Ha , Marianne Jovanovic , Louise Lord","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To identify the important skills and attributes of a practice-based research (PBR) supervisor as perceived by both resident pharmacists and PBR supervisors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In July 2023, past resident pharmacists and PBR supervisors across a multi-center, metropolitan hospital network, were invited to participate in an anonymous, online, modified Delphi panel. Three sequential rounds were used to identify and then prioritize skills and attributes perceived as important in a PBR supervisor from the perspectives of resident pharmacists and supervisors. Supervisors were also asked to identify areas for self-development and improvement.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 100% (12/12) of resident pharmacists and 77% (10/13) of supervisors completed all 3 rounds of the Delphi. “Prior research experience” and “ability to interpret results” were agreed on as important skills by both groups. Three attributes were also agreed on as important: ”approachable and supportive,” \"able to provide direction and structure,” and “able to provide constructive/effective feedback.” Resident pharmacists prioritized “data analysis” as an important skill but supervisors did not, despite being identified by all supervisors as an area requiring development.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Resident pharmacists and supervisors both perceive similar skills and attributes as important for PBR supervision. The results from this study could be used to guide targeted training, support, and resource development for supervisors and align expectations between resident pharmacists and supervisors. Addressing these gaps may enhance professional development for both resident pharmacists and supervisors and improve research quality and output.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"89 2","pages":"Article 101354"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000294592411073X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To identify the important skills and attributes of a practice-based research (PBR) supervisor as perceived by both resident pharmacists and PBR supervisors.
Methods
In July 2023, past resident pharmacists and PBR supervisors across a multi-center, metropolitan hospital network, were invited to participate in an anonymous, online, modified Delphi panel. Three sequential rounds were used to identify and then prioritize skills and attributes perceived as important in a PBR supervisor from the perspectives of resident pharmacists and supervisors. Supervisors were also asked to identify areas for self-development and improvement.
Results
In total, 100% (12/12) of resident pharmacists and 77% (10/13) of supervisors completed all 3 rounds of the Delphi. “Prior research experience” and “ability to interpret results” were agreed on as important skills by both groups. Three attributes were also agreed on as important: ”approachable and supportive,” "able to provide direction and structure,” and “able to provide constructive/effective feedback.” Resident pharmacists prioritized “data analysis” as an important skill but supervisors did not, despite being identified by all supervisors as an area requiring development.
Conclusion
Resident pharmacists and supervisors both perceive similar skills and attributes as important for PBR supervision. The results from this study could be used to guide targeted training, support, and resource development for supervisors and align expectations between resident pharmacists and supervisors. Addressing these gaps may enhance professional development for both resident pharmacists and supervisors and improve research quality and output.
期刊介绍:
The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors.
After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.