Evaluation of the ABC pathway in patients with atrial fibrillation: A machine learning cluster analysis

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Jingyang Wang , Haiyang Bian , Jiangshan Tan , Jun Zhu , Lulu Wang , Wei Xu , Lei Wei , Xuegong Zhang , Yanmin Yang
{"title":"Evaluation of the ABC pathway in patients with atrial fibrillation: A machine learning cluster analysis","authors":"Jingyang Wang ,&nbsp;Haiyang Bian ,&nbsp;Jiangshan Tan ,&nbsp;Jun Zhu ,&nbsp;Lulu Wang ,&nbsp;Wei Xu ,&nbsp;Lei Wei ,&nbsp;Xuegong Zhang ,&nbsp;Yanmin Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Atrial fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway is recommended by guidelines on atrial fibrillation (AF) and exerts a protective role against adverse outcomes of AF patients. But the possible differences in its effectiveness across the diverse range of patients in China have not been systematically evaluated. We aim to comprehensively evaluate multiple clinical characteristics of patients, and probe clusters of ABC criteria efficacy in patients with AF.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used data from an observational cohort that included 2,016 patients with AF. We utilized 45 baseline variables for cluster analysis. We evaluated the management patterns and adverse outcomes of identified phenotypes. We assessed the effectiveness of adherence to the ABC criteria at reducing adverse outcomes of phenotypes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Cluster analysis identified AF patients into three distinct groups. The clusters include Cluster 1: old patients with the highest prevalence rates of atherosclerotic and/or other comorbidities (n = 964), Cluster 2: valve-comorbidities AF in young females (n = 407), and Cluster 3: low comorbidity patients with paroxysmal AF (n = 644). The clusters showed significant differences in MACNE, all-cause death, stroke, and cardiovascular death. All clusters showed that full adherence to the ABC pathway was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of MACNE (all P &lt; 0.05). For three clusters, adherence to the different ‘A’/‘B’/‘C’ criterion alone showed differential clinic impact.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study suggested specific optimization strategies of risk stratification and integrated management for different groups of AF patients considering multiple clinical, genetic and socioeconomic factors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38026,"journal":{"name":"IJC Heart and Vasculature","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101621"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJC Heart and Vasculature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906725000247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Atrial fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway is recommended by guidelines on atrial fibrillation (AF) and exerts a protective role against adverse outcomes of AF patients. But the possible differences in its effectiveness across the diverse range of patients in China have not been systematically evaluated. We aim to comprehensively evaluate multiple clinical characteristics of patients, and probe clusters of ABC criteria efficacy in patients with AF.

Methods

We used data from an observational cohort that included 2,016 patients with AF. We utilized 45 baseline variables for cluster analysis. We evaluated the management patterns and adverse outcomes of identified phenotypes. We assessed the effectiveness of adherence to the ABC criteria at reducing adverse outcomes of phenotypes.

Results

Cluster analysis identified AF patients into three distinct groups. The clusters include Cluster 1: old patients with the highest prevalence rates of atherosclerotic and/or other comorbidities (n = 964), Cluster 2: valve-comorbidities AF in young females (n = 407), and Cluster 3: low comorbidity patients with paroxysmal AF (n = 644). The clusters showed significant differences in MACNE, all-cause death, stroke, and cardiovascular death. All clusters showed that full adherence to the ABC pathway was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of MACNE (all P < 0.05). For three clusters, adherence to the different ‘A’/‘B’/‘C’ criterion alone showed differential clinic impact.

Conclusion

Our study suggested specific optimization strategies of risk stratification and integrated management for different groups of AF patients considering multiple clinical, genetic and socioeconomic factors.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IJC Heart and Vasculature
IJC Heart and Vasculature Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
10.30%
发文量
216
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: IJC Heart & Vasculature is an online-only, open-access journal dedicated to publishing original articles and reviews (also Editorials and Letters to the Editor) which report on structural and functional cardiovascular pathology, with an emphasis on imaging and disease pathophysiology. Articles must be authentic, educational, clinically relevant, and original in their content and scientific approach. IJC Heart & Vasculature requires the highest standards of scientific integrity in order to promote reliable, reproducible and verifiable research findings. All authors are advised to consult the Principles of Ethical Publishing in the International Journal of Cardiology before submitting a manuscript. Submission of a manuscript to this journal gives the publisher the right to publish that paper if it is accepted. Manuscripts may be edited to improve clarity and expression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信