How do transportation professionals perceive the impacts of AI applications in transportation? A latent class cluster analysis

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Yiheng Qian, Tejaswi Polimetla, Thomas W. Sanchez, Xiang Yan
{"title":"How do transportation professionals perceive the impacts of AI applications in transportation? A latent class cluster analysis","authors":"Yiheng Qian, Tejaswi Polimetla, Thomas W. Sanchez, Xiang Yan","doi":"10.1007/s11116-025-10588-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent years have witnessed an increasing number of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in transportation. As a new and emerging technology, AI’s potential to advance transportation goals and the full extent of its impacts on the transportation sector is not yet well understood. As the transportation community explores these topics, it is critical to understand how transportation professionals, the driving force behind AI Transportation applications, perceive AI’s potential efficiency and equity impacts. Toward this goal, we surveyed transportation professionals in the United States and collected a total of 354 responses. Based on the survey responses, we conducted both descriptive analysis and latent class cluster analysis (LCCA). The former provides an overview of prevalent attitudes among transportation professionals, while the latter allows the identification of distinct segments based on their latent attitudes toward AI. We find widespread optimism regarding AI’s potential to improve many aspects of transportation (e.g., efficiency, cost reduction, and traveler experience); however, responses are mixed regarding AI’s potential to advance equity. Moreover, many respondents are concerned that AI ethics are not well understood in the transportation community and that AI use in transportation could exacerbate existing inequalities. Through LCCA, we have identified four latent segments: <i>AI Neutral</i>, <i>AI Optimist</i>, <i>AI Pessimist</i>, and <i>AI Skeptic</i>. The latent class membership is significantly associated with respondents’ age, education level, and AI knowledge level. Overall, the study results shed light on the extent to which the transportation community as a whole is ready to leverage AI systems to transform current practices and inform targeted education to improve the understanding of AI among transportation professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-025-10588-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed an increasing number of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in transportation. As a new and emerging technology, AI’s potential to advance transportation goals and the full extent of its impacts on the transportation sector is not yet well understood. As the transportation community explores these topics, it is critical to understand how transportation professionals, the driving force behind AI Transportation applications, perceive AI’s potential efficiency and equity impacts. Toward this goal, we surveyed transportation professionals in the United States and collected a total of 354 responses. Based on the survey responses, we conducted both descriptive analysis and latent class cluster analysis (LCCA). The former provides an overview of prevalent attitudes among transportation professionals, while the latter allows the identification of distinct segments based on their latent attitudes toward AI. We find widespread optimism regarding AI’s potential to improve many aspects of transportation (e.g., efficiency, cost reduction, and traveler experience); however, responses are mixed regarding AI’s potential to advance equity. Moreover, many respondents are concerned that AI ethics are not well understood in the transportation community and that AI use in transportation could exacerbate existing inequalities. Through LCCA, we have identified four latent segments: AI Neutral, AI Optimist, AI Pessimist, and AI Skeptic. The latent class membership is significantly associated with respondents’ age, education level, and AI knowledge level. Overall, the study results shed light on the extent to which the transportation community as a whole is ready to leverage AI systems to transform current practices and inform targeted education to improve the understanding of AI among transportation professionals.

交通专业人士如何看待人工智能应用对交通的影响?潜在类聚类分析
近年来,人工智能(AI)在交通领域的应用越来越多。作为一项新兴技术,人工智能推进交通目标的潜力及其对交通部门的全面影响尚未得到很好的理解。随着交通运输界对这些主题的探索,了解交通运输专业人士(人工智能交通应用背后的驱动力)如何看待人工智能的潜在效率和公平影响至关重要。为了实现这一目标,我们调查了美国的交通专业人士,共收集了354份回复。根据调查结果,我们进行了描述性分析和潜在类聚类分析(LCCA)。前者概述了交通专业人士的普遍态度,而后者则允许根据他们对人工智能的潜在态度来识别不同的细分市场。我们发现,人们普遍乐观地认为,人工智能有可能改善交通的许多方面(例如,效率、成本降低和旅行者体验);然而,对于人工智能促进公平的潜力,人们的反应不一。此外,许多受访者担心人工智能伦理在交通界没有得到很好的理解,人工智能在交通中的使用可能会加剧现有的不平等。通过LCCA,我们确定了四个潜在的细分:AI中立、AI乐观、AI悲观和AI怀疑。潜在阶级成员与被调查者的年龄、受教育程度和人工智能知识水平显著相关。总体而言,研究结果揭示了整个交通界在多大程度上准备利用人工智能系统改变当前的做法,并为有针对性的教育提供信息,以提高交通专业人员对人工智能的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation
Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world. These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信