Long-term Outcomes and Prognostic Impact of Residual Cancer Burden After Intensified Neoadjuvant Therapy in High-risk Prostate Cancer

IF 25.3 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Praful Ravi, Lucia Kwak, Andres M. Acosta, Saahil Rastogi, Wanling Xie, Aya Abdelnaser, David J. Einstein, Peter Chang, Andrew A. Wagner, Rana R. McKay, Adam S. Kibel, Mary-Ellen Taplin
{"title":"Long-term Outcomes and Prognostic Impact of Residual Cancer Burden After Intensified Neoadjuvant Therapy in High-risk Prostate Cancer","authors":"Praful Ravi, Lucia Kwak, Andres M. Acosta, Saahil Rastogi, Wanling Xie, Aya Abdelnaser, David J. Einstein, Peter Chang, Andrew A. Wagner, Rana R. McKay, Adam S. Kibel, Mary-Ellen Taplin","doi":"10.1016/j.eururo.2025.01.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background and objective</h3>Long-term outcomes and the prognostic impact of the extent of residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) before radical prostatectomy (RP) for high-risk localized prostate cancer (HRLPC) are not known.<h3>Methods</h3>We analyzed data for patients treated in five trials evaluating 6 mo of ARPI NAT for HRLPC at our institution between 2006 and 2018. Residual cancer burden (RCB) was quantitated as the calculated tumor volume adjusted for cellularity in the primary tumor. The primary outcome was metastasis-free survival (MFS) according to conventional imaging. We explored RCB categories using the Contal-O’Quigley method to distinguish high- and low-risk groups for MFS.<h3>Key findings and limitations</h3>Among 218 eligible patients, median prostate-specific antigen at diagnosis was 8 ng/ml, 42 (20%) had cT3–4 disease, and 154 (71%) had a biopsy Gleason score of 8–10. At RP, 24 (11%) had a pathologic complete response and median RCB was 0.05 cm<sup>3</sup> (interquartile range 0.00–0.32). By median follow-up of 5 yr, 45 patients had developed metastases and 11 died; the 5-yr MFS rate was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI] 77–88%). On multivariable analysis, higher RCB was associated with poorer MFS (hazard ratio 1.21, 95% CI 1.01–1.47). The 5-yr MFS rates were 100%, 90% (95% CI 72–97%), 82% (95% CI 73–88%), and 63% (95% CI 40–79%) for patients with RCB-0 (a pathologic complete response or no residual disease), RCB-1 (&lt;0.003 cm<sup>3</sup>), RCB-2 (0.003–0.672 cm<sup>3</sup>), and RCB-3 (≥0.672 cm<sup>3</sup>), respectively. The key limitation is lack of a validation cohort.<h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3>The 5-yr MFS rate for patients treated with ARPI NAT before RP for HRLPC was 83%. The depth of pathologic response, evaluated as the RCB, was highly prognostic for MFS. RCB could be used to guide NAT and post-NAT adjuvant trials in HRLPC.","PeriodicalId":12223,"journal":{"name":"European urology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.01.015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

Long-term outcomes and the prognostic impact of the extent of residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) before radical prostatectomy (RP) for high-risk localized prostate cancer (HRLPC) are not known.

Methods

We analyzed data for patients treated in five trials evaluating 6 mo of ARPI NAT for HRLPC at our institution between 2006 and 2018. Residual cancer burden (RCB) was quantitated as the calculated tumor volume adjusted for cellularity in the primary tumor. The primary outcome was metastasis-free survival (MFS) according to conventional imaging. We explored RCB categories using the Contal-O’Quigley method to distinguish high- and low-risk groups for MFS.

Key findings and limitations

Among 218 eligible patients, median prostate-specific antigen at diagnosis was 8 ng/ml, 42 (20%) had cT3–4 disease, and 154 (71%) had a biopsy Gleason score of 8–10. At RP, 24 (11%) had a pathologic complete response and median RCB was 0.05 cm3 (interquartile range 0.00–0.32). By median follow-up of 5 yr, 45 patients had developed metastases and 11 died; the 5-yr MFS rate was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI] 77–88%). On multivariable analysis, higher RCB was associated with poorer MFS (hazard ratio 1.21, 95% CI 1.01–1.47). The 5-yr MFS rates were 100%, 90% (95% CI 72–97%), 82% (95% CI 73–88%), and 63% (95% CI 40–79%) for patients with RCB-0 (a pathologic complete response or no residual disease), RCB-1 (<0.003 cm3), RCB-2 (0.003–0.672 cm3), and RCB-3 (≥0.672 cm3), respectively. The key limitation is lack of a validation cohort.

Conclusions and clinical implications

The 5-yr MFS rate for patients treated with ARPI NAT before RP for HRLPC was 83%. The depth of pathologic response, evaluated as the RCB, was highly prognostic for MFS. RCB could be used to guide NAT and post-NAT adjuvant trials in HRLPC.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European urology
European urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
43.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1753
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: European Urology is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original articles and reviews on a broad spectrum of urological issues. Covering topics such as oncology, impotence, infertility, pediatrics, lithiasis and endourology, the journal also highlights recent advances in techniques, instrumentation, surgery, and pediatric urology. This comprehensive approach provides readers with an in-depth guide to international developments in urology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信