来自荷兰蒂尔堡大学的Silke van Dijk和他的同事们确定了12个不同的量表,包括119个项目,用于测量气候焦虑,并进行了内容分析,以量化这些量表之间的重叠。结果表明,所有量表之间的项目内容重叠非常弱,这意味着项目捕获的症状是异质的。这些结果强调了在评估气候焦虑方面缺乏一致性,并强调了正确定义和实施这一概念的必要性。对于未来的研究,作者建议加强对量表内容的数据驱动比较,探索对气候焦虑的定义和评估的共识,并制定一个可靠和可推广的测量量表。原参考文献:J.焦虑症。109,102957 (2025)
期刊介绍:
Nature Climate Change is dedicated to addressing the scientific challenge of understanding Earth's changing climate and its societal implications. As a monthly journal, it publishes significant and cutting-edge research on the nature, causes, and impacts of global climate change, as well as its implications for the economy, policy, and the world at large.
The journal publishes original research spanning the natural and social sciences, synthesizing interdisciplinary research to provide a comprehensive understanding of climate change. It upholds the high standards set by all Nature-branded journals, ensuring top-tier original research through a fair and rigorous review process, broad readership access, high standards of copy editing and production, rapid publication, and independence from academic societies and other vested interests.
Nature Climate Change serves as a platform for discussion among experts, publishing opinion, analysis, and review articles. It also features Research Highlights to highlight important developments in the field and original reporting from renowned science journalists in the form of feature articles.
Topics covered in the journal include adaptation, atmospheric science, ecology, economics, energy, impacts and vulnerability, mitigation, oceanography, policy, sociology, and sustainability, among others.