Effectiveness of Aloe vera in the treatment of oral mucositis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

D Cássia-Santos, C K C Santos, L T Fernandes, G Q Carvalho, S N de Aquino, C A A Lemos
{"title":"Effectiveness of Aloe vera in the treatment of oral mucositis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"D Cássia-Santos, C K C Santos, L T Fernandes, G Q Carvalho, S N de Aquino, C A A Lemos","doi":"10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Oral mucositis (OM) is a common complication of cancer patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effectiveness of Aloe vera (AV) in the treatment of OM. The population included cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy or chemotherapy, treated for OM with AV. A search following the PICOS strategy, with specific keywords, identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to September 2024. Seven RCTs involving 355 participants, 170 in the intervention (AV) groups (mean age 39.7 years, standard deviation 23.9 years) and 185 in control groups (mean age 39.0 years, standard deviation 23.5 years), were included. A significant difference in the improvement of severe mucositis cases (grades 3 and 4) was observed with the use of AV compared to control (placebo, sodium bicarbonate, or benzydamine) (odds ratio 0.32, 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.70, P = 0.004). Considering the moderate heterogeneity observed (I<sup>2</sup> = 36%, P = 0.15), a subgroup analysis was conducted. A subgroup analysis showed significant improvement in grade 3 and 4 OM for AV versus placebo (odds ratio 0.22, 95% CI 0.11-0.44, P < 0.001), but not compared with sodium bicarbonate or benzydamine. The results suggest that AV may be beneficial for cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy or chemotherapy, leading to improvements in the more severe stages of OM.</p>","PeriodicalId":94053,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2025.01.015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oral mucositis (OM) is a common complication of cancer patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effectiveness of Aloe vera (AV) in the treatment of OM. The population included cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy or chemotherapy, treated for OM with AV. A search following the PICOS strategy, with specific keywords, identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to September 2024. Seven RCTs involving 355 participants, 170 in the intervention (AV) groups (mean age 39.7 years, standard deviation 23.9 years) and 185 in control groups (mean age 39.0 years, standard deviation 23.5 years), were included. A significant difference in the improvement of severe mucositis cases (grades 3 and 4) was observed with the use of AV compared to control (placebo, sodium bicarbonate, or benzydamine) (odds ratio 0.32, 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.70, P = 0.004). Considering the moderate heterogeneity observed (I2 = 36%, P = 0.15), a subgroup analysis was conducted. A subgroup analysis showed significant improvement in grade 3 and 4 OM for AV versus placebo (odds ratio 0.22, 95% CI 0.11-0.44, P < 0.001), but not compared with sodium bicarbonate or benzydamine. The results suggest that AV may be beneficial for cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy or chemotherapy, leading to improvements in the more severe stages of OM.

芦荟治疗口腔黏膜炎的有效性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
口腔黏膜炎是癌症患者常见的并发症。一项系统综述和荟萃分析评估了芦荟(AV)治疗OM的有效性。人群包括接受放疗或化疗的癌症患者,用AV治疗OM。根据PICOS策略进行搜索,使用特定关键词,确定了截至2024年9月发表的随机对照试验(rct)。共纳入7项rct,共355名受试者,其中干预组170人(平均年龄39.7岁,标准差23.9岁),对照组185人(平均年龄39.0岁,标准差23.5岁)。与对照组(安慰剂、碳酸氢钠或苄胺)相比,使用AV对严重粘膜炎病例(3级和4级)的改善有显著差异(优势比0.32,95%可信区间0.15-0.70,P = 0.004)。考虑到中度异质性(I2 = 36%, P = 0.15),进行亚组分析。亚组分析显示,与安慰剂相比,AV的3级和4级OM有显著改善(优势比0.22,95% CI 0.11-0.44, P < 0.001),但与碳酸氢钠或苄胺相比没有显著改善。结果表明,AV可能对接受放疗或化疗的癌症患者有益,从而改善更严重阶段的OM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信