Comparison of the lower genital tract microbiome composition in patients with benign gynecological disease.

IF 2.3 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Frontiers in global women's health Pub Date : 2025-01-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2025.1507907
Yonghui Shi, Jun Li, Jinjing Xie, Tianye Yang, Qiongyan Ma, Hua Chen, Wenwei Guo
{"title":"Comparison of the lower genital tract microbiome composition in patients with benign gynecological disease.","authors":"Yonghui Shi, Jun Li, Jinjing Xie, Tianye Yang, Qiongyan Ma, Hua Chen, Wenwei Guo","doi":"10.3389/fgwh.2025.1507907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Lower genital tract microbiome dysbiosis has been associated with several gynecological diseases. However, the differences in microbiome composition among patients with several gynecological diseases, such as endometrial polyps and uterine myoma, are poorly understood. Studying the lower genital tract microbiome composition in patients with benign gynecological diseases could provide new insights for interpreting the complex interplay between the microbiome and pathogenesis and finding new targets for preventive measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 16 patients with endometrial polyps (EPs), 11 patients with uterine myoma (UM), 6 patients with ovarian cysts (OC) and 36 healthy women (HWs) were recruited for this study. Samples were obtained from vaginal secretions. The DNA was isolated from the samples, and the V3-V4 regions were amplified. The sequencing libraries were generated and sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Bacteroidota were the most common phyla in all four groups, whereas OC presented the highest abundance of Firmicutes and the lowest abundance of Bacteroidota. At the genus level, <i>Lactobacillus</i> in the OC group was significantly greater than that in the HW group, and <i>Atopobium</i> in the UM group was significantly lower than that in the HW group. The abundance of <i>Gardnerella</i> was greater in the UM group than in the EP group, and the abundance of <i>Streptococcus</i> was greater in the EP group. The richness and evenness of the microbiome were generally consistent among the HW, EP, UM, and OC groups. Principal component analysis (PCA), principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) and nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) revealed no distinct separation trends among the four groups. According to ANOSIM, there was no significant difference in community structure among the four groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A nonsignificant result was obtained from the microbiome diversity comparison among the different groups. However, we demonstrated that the OC group had a greater abundance of <i>Lactobacillus</i> and that the UM group had a lower abundance of <i>Atopobium,</i> which might contribute to the occurrence of diseases, providing new clues for preventive measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":73087,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in global women's health","volume":"6 ","pages":"1507907"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11790617/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in global women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2025.1507907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Lower genital tract microbiome dysbiosis has been associated with several gynecological diseases. However, the differences in microbiome composition among patients with several gynecological diseases, such as endometrial polyps and uterine myoma, are poorly understood. Studying the lower genital tract microbiome composition in patients with benign gynecological diseases could provide new insights for interpreting the complex interplay between the microbiome and pathogenesis and finding new targets for preventive measures.

Methods: A total of 16 patients with endometrial polyps (EPs), 11 patients with uterine myoma (UM), 6 patients with ovarian cysts (OC) and 36 healthy women (HWs) were recruited for this study. Samples were obtained from vaginal secretions. The DNA was isolated from the samples, and the V3-V4 regions were amplified. The sequencing libraries were generated and sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform.

Results: Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Bacteroidota were the most common phyla in all four groups, whereas OC presented the highest abundance of Firmicutes and the lowest abundance of Bacteroidota. At the genus level, Lactobacillus in the OC group was significantly greater than that in the HW group, and Atopobium in the UM group was significantly lower than that in the HW group. The abundance of Gardnerella was greater in the UM group than in the EP group, and the abundance of Streptococcus was greater in the EP group. The richness and evenness of the microbiome were generally consistent among the HW, EP, UM, and OC groups. Principal component analysis (PCA), principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) and nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) revealed no distinct separation trends among the four groups. According to ANOSIM, there was no significant difference in community structure among the four groups.

Conclusions: A nonsignificant result was obtained from the microbiome diversity comparison among the different groups. However, we demonstrated that the OC group had a greater abundance of Lactobacillus and that the UM group had a lower abundance of Atopobium, which might contribute to the occurrence of diseases, providing new clues for preventive measures.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信