[Examining the perspective of community general support centers and promoting the use of early stage dementia-intensive support teams: Comparing institutions with and without support teams].

Yumi Kozaki
{"title":"[Examining the perspective of community general support centers and promoting the use of early stage dementia-intensive support teams: Comparing institutions with and without support teams].","authors":"Yumi Kozaki","doi":"10.11236/jph.24-014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives Although numerous studies have explored early stage dementia-intensive support teams, focusing on their effectiveness and associated challenges, there is insufficient research on community comprehensive support centers that use support teams. Thus, we focused on community comprehensive support centers from the perspectives of their operators and users, examined the actualities and challenges of support team use, and considered ways to encourage such use.Methods A questionnaire survey was mailed to 2,000 community general support centers selected through evenly-spaced sampling from 5,625 centers in Japan. The survey was conducted from November to December 2022. The survey included basic attributes (institution and presence of a support team), number of times a support team was used, actual number of users, and issues with support team use. For the analysis, we defined centers with and without support teams as \"operators\" and \"users,\" respectively, and analyzed each group. The participants' demographic details and data related to the frequency of use of support teams were tabulated. Text mining was used to analyze free-field responses.Results A total of 773 responses were received (response rate; 38.8%). Among the respondents, 313 (41.5%) had support teams and 441 (58.4%) did not. The support team use rate was 86.6% for the former and 79.4% for the latter. In 2021, most respondents noted that approximately \"1-5 individuals\" used support teams, regardless of whether the support center had one.Challenges with support team use identified by centers without support teams were as follows; requirements of support recipients and rules for use under \"mechanisms of use,\" involvement of team doctors and expertise of team members under \"support functions,\" and collaborative support relationship and dissemination of project information under \"system for use.\" Support centers with support teams identified the following challenges; requirements of support recipients and management rules under \"management mechanisms,\" involvement of team doctors and healthcare collaboration under \"support functions,\" and team members role awareness and staff shortage under \"management system.\"Conclusion Many comprehensive centers infrequently used support teams. To promote support team use, the system must be reviewed from the operator and user perspectives to simplify the support team system's rules and ease the requirements for support recipients. Moreover, all dementia supporters must engage in regular and ongoing discussions about the dementia support system, focusing on the municipal responsibility for system operation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72032,"journal":{"name":"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11236/jph.24-014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives Although numerous studies have explored early stage dementia-intensive support teams, focusing on their effectiveness and associated challenges, there is insufficient research on community comprehensive support centers that use support teams. Thus, we focused on community comprehensive support centers from the perspectives of their operators and users, examined the actualities and challenges of support team use, and considered ways to encourage such use.Methods A questionnaire survey was mailed to 2,000 community general support centers selected through evenly-spaced sampling from 5,625 centers in Japan. The survey was conducted from November to December 2022. The survey included basic attributes (institution and presence of a support team), number of times a support team was used, actual number of users, and issues with support team use. For the analysis, we defined centers with and without support teams as "operators" and "users," respectively, and analyzed each group. The participants' demographic details and data related to the frequency of use of support teams were tabulated. Text mining was used to analyze free-field responses.Results A total of 773 responses were received (response rate; 38.8%). Among the respondents, 313 (41.5%) had support teams and 441 (58.4%) did not. The support team use rate was 86.6% for the former and 79.4% for the latter. In 2021, most respondents noted that approximately "1-5 individuals" used support teams, regardless of whether the support center had one.Challenges with support team use identified by centers without support teams were as follows; requirements of support recipients and rules for use under "mechanisms of use," involvement of team doctors and expertise of team members under "support functions," and collaborative support relationship and dissemination of project information under "system for use." Support centers with support teams identified the following challenges; requirements of support recipients and management rules under "management mechanisms," involvement of team doctors and healthcare collaboration under "support functions," and team members role awareness and staff shortage under "management system."Conclusion Many comprehensive centers infrequently used support teams. To promote support team use, the system must be reviewed from the operator and user perspectives to simplify the support team system's rules and ease the requirements for support recipients. Moreover, all dementia supporters must engage in regular and ongoing discussions about the dementia support system, focusing on the municipal responsibility for system operation.

[检查社区综合支持中心的观点和促进早期痴呆症密集支持团队的使用:比较有和没有支持团队的机构]。
虽然有许多研究探讨了早期痴呆症密集支持团队,重点关注其有效性和相关挑战,但对使用支持团队的社区综合支持中心的研究不足。因此,我们从运营商和用户的角度关注社区综合支持中心,检查支持团队使用的现状和挑战,并考虑鼓励这种使用的方法。方法采用等间隔抽样的方法,从日本5625个社区综合支持中心中抽取2000个社区综合支持中心进行问卷调查。该调查于2022年11月至12月进行。调查包括基本属性(支持团队的机构和存在)、使用支持团队的次数、实际用户数量以及使用支持团队的问题。为了进行分析,我们将有支持团队和没有支持团队的中心分别定义为“操作员”和“用户”,并对每一组进行分析。参与者的人口统计细节和与使用支持小组的频率有关的数据被制成表格。文本挖掘用于分析自由场响应。结果共收到回复773份(回复率;38.8%)。在被调查者中,313家(41.5%)有支持团队,441家(58.4%)没有支持团队。前者的支持团队使用率为86.6%,后者的支持团队使用率为79.4%。在2021年,大多数受访者指出,大约有“1-5个人”使用支持团队,而不管支持中心是否有支持团队。没有支持团队的中心在使用支持团队方面遇到的挑战如下:“使用机制”下支持接受者的需求和使用规则,“支持功能”下团队医生和团队成员的专业知识的参与,以及“使用系统”下项目信息的协作支持关系和传播。支持中心和支持团队确定了以下挑战;“管理机制”下的支持对象需求和管理规则,“支持职能”下的团队医生参与和医疗协作,“管理制度”下的团队成员角色意识和人员短缺。结论许多综合中心使用支持团队的频率较低。为了促进支援小组的使用,必须从操作员和用户的角度对系统进行审查,以简化支援小组系统的规则并减轻对支援接受者的要求。此外,所有痴呆症支持者必须定期和持续地参与痴呆症支持系统的讨论,重点是市政对系统运营的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信