Impact of school salad bars on fruit and vegetable selection, intake, and waste in Mid-Atlantic elementary schools.

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Melanie K Bean, Suzanne E Mazzeo, Lilian de Jonge, Laura Thornton, Hollie Raynor, Ashley Mendoza, Sarah Farthing, Bonnie Moore
{"title":"Impact of school salad bars on fruit and vegetable selection, intake, and waste in Mid-Atlantic elementary schools.","authors":"Melanie K Bean, Suzanne E Mazzeo, Lilian de Jonge, Laura Thornton, Hollie Raynor, Ashley Mendoza, Sarah Farthing, Bonnie Moore","doi":"10.1186/s12966-025-01713-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few studies have empirically examined the impact of school salad bars on elementary students' fruit and vegetable (FV) consumption within the National School Lunch Program (NSLP). This natural experiment evaluated the impact of salad bars on FV selection, intake, and waste within elementary schools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven school pairs, matched on Title I status and percentage of students from ethnic or racial minority backgrounds, were randomly selected. All schools served pre-portioned FV at baseline. One school within each pair received a salad bar; the other continued to serve pre-portioned FV (Control). Digital imagery plate waste methods were applied at baseline and 4-6 weeks after schools installed salad bars (post). Images were rated in the laboratory (ICCs = .94-.99) to determine FV selection, intake, and waste (servings [1 NSLP serving = ½c]). Multilevel modeling evaluated group (Salad Bar vs Control) and time (baseline vs post) differences and group-by-time interactions. Differences in outcomes by Title I status were also examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across schools, mean NSLP participation was 54%. N = 6,623 trays were included (n = 3,273 Salad Bar; n = 3,350 Control). Students in Salad Bar schools selected (+ .44c) and consumed (+ .36c) more FV at post, compared to baseline. Control students decreased FV selection (-.05c) with no change in intake from baseline to post. Group, time, and group-by-time interactions were significant (ps < .0001). When examined separately, results suggest that these effects are driven by fruit. Salad Bar students increased fruit selection (+ .45c), intake (+ .36c), and waste (+ .09c) from baseline to post; no significant changes were observed in Controls. There was no significant change in vegetable selection, intake or waste for either group. Findings did not differ based on Title I status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Salad bars were effective in increasing elementary school students' fruit selection and intake, yet did not increase vegetable selection or intake. Additional efforts are needed to increase vegetable intake and minimize fruit waste from salad bars. Consistent findings across schools, regardless of Title I status, suggest potential for salad bars to yield increased fruit intake across socioeconomic groups. Findings can inform policies designed to increase FV intake within the NSLP.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This investigation reports results of a systematic evaluation of school salad bars and does not meet criteria for a clinical trial, yet was retrospectively registered (10/28/22) in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05605483) as an observational study.</p>","PeriodicalId":50336,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity","volume":"22 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11800604/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-025-01713-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Few studies have empirically examined the impact of school salad bars on elementary students' fruit and vegetable (FV) consumption within the National School Lunch Program (NSLP). This natural experiment evaluated the impact of salad bars on FV selection, intake, and waste within elementary schools.

Methods: Seven school pairs, matched on Title I status and percentage of students from ethnic or racial minority backgrounds, were randomly selected. All schools served pre-portioned FV at baseline. One school within each pair received a salad bar; the other continued to serve pre-portioned FV (Control). Digital imagery plate waste methods were applied at baseline and 4-6 weeks after schools installed salad bars (post). Images were rated in the laboratory (ICCs = .94-.99) to determine FV selection, intake, and waste (servings [1 NSLP serving = ½c]). Multilevel modeling evaluated group (Salad Bar vs Control) and time (baseline vs post) differences and group-by-time interactions. Differences in outcomes by Title I status were also examined.

Results: Across schools, mean NSLP participation was 54%. N = 6,623 trays were included (n = 3,273 Salad Bar; n = 3,350 Control). Students in Salad Bar schools selected (+ .44c) and consumed (+ .36c) more FV at post, compared to baseline. Control students decreased FV selection (-.05c) with no change in intake from baseline to post. Group, time, and group-by-time interactions were significant (ps < .0001). When examined separately, results suggest that these effects are driven by fruit. Salad Bar students increased fruit selection (+ .45c), intake (+ .36c), and waste (+ .09c) from baseline to post; no significant changes were observed in Controls. There was no significant change in vegetable selection, intake or waste for either group. Findings did not differ based on Title I status.

Conclusions: Salad bars were effective in increasing elementary school students' fruit selection and intake, yet did not increase vegetable selection or intake. Additional efforts are needed to increase vegetable intake and minimize fruit waste from salad bars. Consistent findings across schools, regardless of Title I status, suggest potential for salad bars to yield increased fruit intake across socioeconomic groups. Findings can inform policies designed to increase FV intake within the NSLP.

Trial registration: This investigation reports results of a systematic evaluation of school salad bars and does not meet criteria for a clinical trial, yet was retrospectively registered (10/28/22) in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05605483) as an observational study.

学校沙拉吧对中大西洋地区小学水果和蔬菜选择、摄入和浪费的影响。
背景:在国家学校午餐计划(NSLP)中,很少有研究实证检验学校沙拉吧对小学生水果和蔬菜(FV)消费的影响。本自然实验评估了沙拉棒对小学生FV选择、摄入和浪费的影响。方法:随机选择7对学校,这些学校在Title I的地位和来自少数民族或种族背景的学生百分比上相匹配。所有学校都在基线时提供预先分配的FV。每组中有一所学校获得了沙拉吧;另一组继续提供预先分配的FV(对照组)。在学校安装沙拉吧后的基线和4-6周,采用数字图像板废物方法。在实验室对图像进行评分(icc = 0.94 - 0.99),以确定FV的选择、摄入和浪费(份量[1份NSLP份量=½c])。多层模型评估组(沙拉吧vs对照组)和时间(基线vs后)的差异和组间时间的相互作用。研究还检查了Title I状态对结果的差异。结果:在所有学校,NSLP的平均参与率为54%。N = 6,623个托盘(N = 3,273个沙拉吧;n = 3350对照)。与基线相比,沙拉吧学校的学生在工作后选择(+ 0.44 c)和消耗(+ 0.36 c)更多的FV。对照学生减少了FV选择(- 0.05 c),从基线到后的摄入量没有变化。结论:沙拉棒对增加小学生的水果选择和摄入量有效,但对增加蔬菜选择和摄入量无效。需要额外的努力来增加蔬菜摄入量,并尽量减少沙拉吧浪费的水果。所有学校的一致发现,无论是否符合第一修正案,都表明沙拉吧有可能增加社会经济群体的水果摄入量。研究结果可以为在NSLP内设计增加FV摄入量的政策提供信息。试验注册:本研究报告了学校沙拉吧的系统评估结果,不符合临床试验的标准,但作为一项观察性研究在clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05605483)上回顾性注册(10/28/22)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
138
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (IJBNPA) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain. IJBNPA is devoted to furthering the understanding of the behavioral aspects of diet and physical activity and is unique in its inclusion of multiple levels of analysis, including populations, groups and individuals and its inclusion of epidemiology, and behavioral, theoretical and measurement research areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信