Clinicopathologic Features of PRAME-Positive Common Melanocytic Nevi: A Case-Control Study.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 DERMATOLOGY
Ronan J Knittel, Nathan T Harvey, Nima Mesbah Ardakani, Blake O'Brien, Stephen Lee, Benjamin A Wood
{"title":"Clinicopathologic Features of PRAME-Positive Common Melanocytic Nevi: A Case-Control Study.","authors":"Ronan J Knittel, Nathan T Harvey, Nima Mesbah Ardakani, Blake O'Brien, Stephen Lee, Benjamin A Wood","doi":"10.1097/DAD.0000000000002932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME) immunohistochemistry has been found to be relatively sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of melanoma, although the detection of PRAME positivity in some melanocytic nevi is a significant limitation. This study was designed to investigate the features of common melanocytic nevi showing PRAME staining, encountered in routine community practice. We reviewed all pathology reports on common melanocytic nevi seen in routine practice for a 1-month period and found that 7.1% of nevi stained with PRAME were considered positive by the original reporting pathologist. A total of 41 PRAME-positive nevi (representing 4.7% of nevi) and a control group of 43 PRAME-negative nevi collected during the same period were identified. The histologic features were reviewed, and the diagnosis and PRAME staining were recorded in a masked fashion by 3 dermatopathologists. Our results suggest that caution is warranted in the interpretation of PRAME in the assessment of small lentiginous melanocytic nevi with a low level of suspicion for melanoma, because these are not infrequently PRAME positive. We found a statistically significant association between the presence of solar elastosis and lentiginous growth pattern, and PRAME status ( P < 0.01). When comparing the original diagnosis with the reviewer's diagnosis, the original diagnosis was severely atypical in 54% of PRAME-positive cases, while only 7% were considered to show severe atypia on review masked to PRAME status ( P < 0.001). There was no such discrepancy among PRAME-negative cases (9% vs. 19%, considered severely atypical). This finding provides evidence of a \"PRAME bias\" in the interpretation of melanocytic lesions with no or mild atypia, whereby such lesions are classified as severely atypical when PRAME is positive, likely with the intention of prompting re-excision.</p>","PeriodicalId":50967,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Dermatopathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Dermatopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DAD.0000000000002932","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME) immunohistochemistry has been found to be relatively sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of melanoma, although the detection of PRAME positivity in some melanocytic nevi is a significant limitation. This study was designed to investigate the features of common melanocytic nevi showing PRAME staining, encountered in routine community practice. We reviewed all pathology reports on common melanocytic nevi seen in routine practice for a 1-month period and found that 7.1% of nevi stained with PRAME were considered positive by the original reporting pathologist. A total of 41 PRAME-positive nevi (representing 4.7% of nevi) and a control group of 43 PRAME-negative nevi collected during the same period were identified. The histologic features were reviewed, and the diagnosis and PRAME staining were recorded in a masked fashion by 3 dermatopathologists. Our results suggest that caution is warranted in the interpretation of PRAME in the assessment of small lentiginous melanocytic nevi with a low level of suspicion for melanoma, because these are not infrequently PRAME positive. We found a statistically significant association between the presence of solar elastosis and lentiginous growth pattern, and PRAME status ( P < 0.01). When comparing the original diagnosis with the reviewer's diagnosis, the original diagnosis was severely atypical in 54% of PRAME-positive cases, while only 7% were considered to show severe atypia on review masked to PRAME status ( P < 0.001). There was no such discrepancy among PRAME-negative cases (9% vs. 19%, considered severely atypical). This finding provides evidence of a "PRAME bias" in the interpretation of melanocytic lesions with no or mild atypia, whereby such lesions are classified as severely atypical when PRAME is positive, likely with the intention of prompting re-excision.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
453
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dermatopathology offers outstanding coverage of the latest diagnostic approaches and laboratory techniques, as well as insights into contemporary social, legal, and ethical concerns. Each issue features review articles on clinical, technical, and basic science advances and illuminating, detailed case reports. With the The American Journal of Dermatopathology you''ll be able to: -Incorporate step-by-step coverage of new or difficult-to-diagnose conditions from their earliest histopathologic signs to confirmatory immunohistochemical and molecular studies. -Apply the latest basic science findings and clinical approaches to your work right away. -Tap into the skills and expertise of your peers and colleagues the world over peer-reviewed original articles, "Extraordinary cases reports", coverage of practical guidelines, and graphic presentations. -Expand your horizons through the Journal''s idea-generating forum for debating controversial issues and learning from preeminent researchers and clinicians
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信