Ronan J Knittel, Nathan T Harvey, Nima Mesbah Ardakani, Blake O'Brien, Stephen Lee, Benjamin A Wood
{"title":"Clinicopathologic Features of PRAME-Positive Common Melanocytic Nevi: A Case-Control Study.","authors":"Ronan J Knittel, Nathan T Harvey, Nima Mesbah Ardakani, Blake O'Brien, Stephen Lee, Benjamin A Wood","doi":"10.1097/DAD.0000000000002932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME) immunohistochemistry has been found to be relatively sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of melanoma, although the detection of PRAME positivity in some melanocytic nevi is a significant limitation. This study was designed to investigate the features of common melanocytic nevi showing PRAME staining, encountered in routine community practice. We reviewed all pathology reports on common melanocytic nevi seen in routine practice for a 1-month period and found that 7.1% of nevi stained with PRAME were considered positive by the original reporting pathologist. A total of 41 PRAME-positive nevi (representing 4.7% of nevi) and a control group of 43 PRAME-negative nevi collected during the same period were identified. The histologic features were reviewed, and the diagnosis and PRAME staining were recorded in a masked fashion by 3 dermatopathologists. Our results suggest that caution is warranted in the interpretation of PRAME in the assessment of small lentiginous melanocytic nevi with a low level of suspicion for melanoma, because these are not infrequently PRAME positive. We found a statistically significant association between the presence of solar elastosis and lentiginous growth pattern, and PRAME status ( P < 0.01). When comparing the original diagnosis with the reviewer's diagnosis, the original diagnosis was severely atypical in 54% of PRAME-positive cases, while only 7% were considered to show severe atypia on review masked to PRAME status ( P < 0.001). There was no such discrepancy among PRAME-negative cases (9% vs. 19%, considered severely atypical). This finding provides evidence of a \"PRAME bias\" in the interpretation of melanocytic lesions with no or mild atypia, whereby such lesions are classified as severely atypical when PRAME is positive, likely with the intention of prompting re-excision.</p>","PeriodicalId":50967,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Dermatopathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Dermatopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DAD.0000000000002932","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract: Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma (PRAME) immunohistochemistry has been found to be relatively sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of melanoma, although the detection of PRAME positivity in some melanocytic nevi is a significant limitation. This study was designed to investigate the features of common melanocytic nevi showing PRAME staining, encountered in routine community practice. We reviewed all pathology reports on common melanocytic nevi seen in routine practice for a 1-month period and found that 7.1% of nevi stained with PRAME were considered positive by the original reporting pathologist. A total of 41 PRAME-positive nevi (representing 4.7% of nevi) and a control group of 43 PRAME-negative nevi collected during the same period were identified. The histologic features were reviewed, and the diagnosis and PRAME staining were recorded in a masked fashion by 3 dermatopathologists. Our results suggest that caution is warranted in the interpretation of PRAME in the assessment of small lentiginous melanocytic nevi with a low level of suspicion for melanoma, because these are not infrequently PRAME positive. We found a statistically significant association between the presence of solar elastosis and lentiginous growth pattern, and PRAME status ( P < 0.01). When comparing the original diagnosis with the reviewer's diagnosis, the original diagnosis was severely atypical in 54% of PRAME-positive cases, while only 7% were considered to show severe atypia on review masked to PRAME status ( P < 0.001). There was no such discrepancy among PRAME-negative cases (9% vs. 19%, considered severely atypical). This finding provides evidence of a "PRAME bias" in the interpretation of melanocytic lesions with no or mild atypia, whereby such lesions are classified as severely atypical when PRAME is positive, likely with the intention of prompting re-excision.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Dermatopathology offers outstanding coverage of the latest diagnostic approaches and laboratory techniques, as well as insights into contemporary social, legal, and ethical concerns. Each issue features review articles on clinical, technical, and basic science advances and illuminating, detailed case reports.
With the The American Journal of Dermatopathology you''ll be able to:
-Incorporate step-by-step coverage of new or difficult-to-diagnose conditions from their earliest histopathologic signs to confirmatory immunohistochemical and molecular studies.
-Apply the latest basic science findings and clinical approaches to your work right away.
-Tap into the skills and expertise of your peers and colleagues the world over peer-reviewed original articles, "Extraordinary cases reports", coverage of practical guidelines, and graphic presentations.
-Expand your horizons through the Journal''s idea-generating forum for debating controversial issues and learning from preeminent researchers and clinicians