Testicular Implant Complications after Transmasculine Gender Affirming Surgery.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Patrick Ho, Emily Schmidt-Beuchat, Michaela Sljivich, Miroslav Djordjevic, Ethan Nyein, Rajveer S Purohit
{"title":"Testicular Implant Complications after Transmasculine Gender Affirming Surgery.","authors":"Patrick Ho, Emily Schmidt-Beuchat, Michaela Sljivich, Miroslav Djordjevic, Ethan Nyein, Rajveer S Purohit","doi":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Complications from testicular implantation in transgender men can cause significant distress, repeat visits to the emergency department, and require reoperation for explantation. Outcomes for these implants have not been well described in the literature. This study compares patient and surgery specific factors with complications from testicular implants in transgender men.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent testicular implantation. Surgery was standardized across patients with placement through incisions at the top of the labia majora or medially during metoidioplasty. Complication rates, including infection, erosion, migration, and pain requiring removal was compared with patient factors, including body mass index (BMI), smoking status, and implant size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 116 testicular implants, 12% had a complication requiring removal. The most common reason for removal was erosion of the prosthesis, which occurred in 6 instances. Migration was a relatively frequent complaint, with 10% of patients noting relocation of an implant. However, only 4 implants ultimately underwent reoperation for migration. Four implants caused enough pain to require reoperation. On logistic regression of BMI, age, smoking status, and immunocompromised state on removal of prosthesis, no factor was found to be a significant predictor of removal. Increasing implant size was not associated with an increased likelihood of removal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Complications after testicular implants in transgender men are not uncommon events. Although there appears to be a growing trend toward smaller prostheses in the literature, our data suggest that implant size is not a significant predictor of complications requiring prosthetic removal.</p>","PeriodicalId":49283,"journal":{"name":"International Braz J Urol","volume":"51 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11884629/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Braz J Urol","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0427","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Complications from testicular implantation in transgender men can cause significant distress, repeat visits to the emergency department, and require reoperation for explantation. Outcomes for these implants have not been well described in the literature. This study compares patient and surgery specific factors with complications from testicular implants in transgender men.

Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent testicular implantation. Surgery was standardized across patients with placement through incisions at the top of the labia majora or medially during metoidioplasty. Complication rates, including infection, erosion, migration, and pain requiring removal was compared with patient factors, including body mass index (BMI), smoking status, and implant size.

Results: Of the 116 testicular implants, 12% had a complication requiring removal. The most common reason for removal was erosion of the prosthesis, which occurred in 6 instances. Migration was a relatively frequent complaint, with 10% of patients noting relocation of an implant. However, only 4 implants ultimately underwent reoperation for migration. Four implants caused enough pain to require reoperation. On logistic regression of BMI, age, smoking status, and immunocompromised state on removal of prosthesis, no factor was found to be a significant predictor of removal. Increasing implant size was not associated with an increased likelihood of removal.

Conclusions: Complications after testicular implants in transgender men are not uncommon events. Although there appears to be a growing trend toward smaller prostheses in the literature, our data suggest that implant size is not a significant predictor of complications requiring prosthetic removal.

跨男性性别确认手术后睾丸植入并发症。
目的:变性男性睾丸植入的并发症可引起严重的痛苦,反复就诊急诊,并需要再次手术切除。这些植入物的结果在文献中没有很好的描述。本研究比较了变性男性睾丸植入术后患者和手术并发症的具体因素。材料和方法:我们对接受睾丸植入的患者进行回顾性分析。手术是标准化的患者通过切口放置在大阴唇顶部或内侧在子宫内膜成形术。并发症发生率,包括感染、糜烂、移位和需要移除的疼痛,比较患者因素,包括身体质量指数(BMI)、吸烟状况和种植体大小。结果:116例睾丸植入物中,12%有并发症需要切除。拔牙最常见的原因是假体侵蚀,共发生6例。移位是相对常见的主诉,10%的患者注意到植入物移位。然而,只有4个植入物最终进行了再次移植手术。四个植入物造成了足够的疼痛,需要再次手术。通过BMI、年龄、吸烟状况和免疫功能低下状态对假体移除的logistic回归分析,没有发现任何因素是移除的显著预测因子。种植体尺寸的增加与拔除的可能性无关。结论:变性男性睾丸植入术后并发症并不少见。虽然在文献中出现了越来越趋向于小尺寸假体的趋势,但我们的数据表明,假体尺寸并不是需要移除假体的并发症的重要预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Braz J Urol
International Braz J Urol UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
21.60%
发文量
246
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信