Biplanar or Monoplanar Prostate Biopsy: Should Transrectal and Transperineal Ap-proaches be Combined for Prostate Cancer Detection?

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Zeng Zhou, Tiewen Li, Yichen Zhang, Xuehao Zhou, Xiaohai Wang, Di Cui, Yiping Zhu, Chenyi Jiang, Wenhuan Guo, Bangmin Han, Yuan J Ruan
{"title":"Biplanar or Monoplanar Prostate Biopsy: Should Transrectal and Transperineal Ap-proaches be Combined for Prostate Cancer Detection?","authors":"Zeng Zhou, Tiewen Li, Yichen Zhang, Xuehao Zhou, Xiaohai Wang, Di Cui, Yiping Zhu, Chenyi Jiang, Wenhuan Guo, Bangmin Han, Yuan J Ruan","doi":"10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) remains challenging, particularly because standard biopsy techniques do not routinely include anterior zone, leading to potential missed diagnoses in this region. This study evaluates the accuracy and safety of biplanar stereotactic biopsy for diagnosing anterior clinically significant PCa (csPCa).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>After propensity score matching analysis, data from 256 patients were retrospectively analyzed, including 128 in the biplanar group (transrectal targeted biopsy with transperineal systematic biopsy) and 128 in the monoplanar group (transperineal targeted biopsy with transperineal systematic biopsy). PCa detection rates, lesion locations, csPCa, clinically insignificant PCa (ciPCa), and complication incidences were compared. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models evaluated factors influencing biopsy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed in overall PCa detection, ciPCa, posterior lesions, or postoperative complications between biplanar and monoplanar groups. The biplanar group demonstrated a higher detection rate for anterior csPCa (P=0.025). The overall International Society of Urological Pathology grade group (ISUP GG) distributions for Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores 3 to 5 were not significantly different. Logistic regression identified age and PSA levels as independent predictors of higher detection rates, while univariable analysis showed that prostate volume had a significantly smaller effect on PCa detection rates in the biplanar group compared to the monoplanar group. Postoperative complications showed no statistically significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, biplanar stereotactic biopsy was superior to monoplanar biopsy in detecting anterior csPCa. Both methods demonstrated no significant differences in overall PCa detection rates and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":49283,"journal":{"name":"International Braz J Urol","volume":"51 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11884637/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Braz J Urol","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.0630","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) remains challenging, particularly because standard biopsy techniques do not routinely include anterior zone, leading to potential missed diagnoses in this region. This study evaluates the accuracy and safety of biplanar stereotactic biopsy for diagnosing anterior clinically significant PCa (csPCa).

Materials and methods: After propensity score matching analysis, data from 256 patients were retrospectively analyzed, including 128 in the biplanar group (transrectal targeted biopsy with transperineal systematic biopsy) and 128 in the monoplanar group (transperineal targeted biopsy with transperineal systematic biopsy). PCa detection rates, lesion locations, csPCa, clinically insignificant PCa (ciPCa), and complication incidences were compared. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models evaluated factors influencing biopsy outcomes.

Results: No significant differences were observed in overall PCa detection, ciPCa, posterior lesions, or postoperative complications between biplanar and monoplanar groups. The biplanar group demonstrated a higher detection rate for anterior csPCa (P=0.025). The overall International Society of Urological Pathology grade group (ISUP GG) distributions for Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores 3 to 5 were not significantly different. Logistic regression identified age and PSA levels as independent predictors of higher detection rates, while univariable analysis showed that prostate volume had a significantly smaller effect on PCa detection rates in the biplanar group compared to the monoplanar group. Postoperative complications showed no statistically significant differences.

Conclusions: In conclusion, biplanar stereotactic biopsy was superior to monoplanar biopsy in detecting anterior csPCa. Both methods demonstrated no significant differences in overall PCa detection rates and safety.

双平面或单平面前列腺活检:是否应经直肠和经会阴入路联合检测前列腺癌?
目的:前列腺癌(PCa)的准确诊断仍然具有挑战性,特别是因为标准活检技术通常不包括前区,导致该区域的潜在漏诊。本研究评估双平面立体定向活检诊断前路临床重要前列腺癌(csPCa)的准确性和安全性。材料和方法:经倾向评分匹配分析,回顾性分析256例患者的资料,其中双平面组128例(经直肠靶向活检+经会阴系统活检),单平面组128例(经会阴靶向活检+经会阴系统活检)。比较PCa检出率、病变部位、csPCa、临床不明显PCa (ciPCa)、并发症发生率。单变量和多变量logistic回归模型评估了影响活检结果的因素。结果:双平面组与单平面组在前列腺癌总检出率、ciPCa、后部病变及术后并发症方面均无显著差异。双平面组前路csPCa检出率较高(P=0.025)。前列腺影像学报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分3至5分的国际泌尿病理学会分级组(ISUP GG)总体分布无显著差异。Logistic回归发现年龄和PSA水平是高检出率的独立预测因素,而单变量分析显示前列腺体积对双平面组前列腺癌检出率的影响明显小于单平面组。术后并发症差异无统计学意义。结论:双平面立体定向活检检测前路csPCa优于单平面活检。两种方法在总体前列腺癌检出率和安全性上均无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Braz J Urol
International Braz J Urol UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
21.60%
发文量
246
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信