{"title":"Infrapatellar Approach to Intramedullary Nail Fixation of Distal One-Fourth Tibial Fractures.","authors":"Yong-Cheol Yoon, Hyung Suh Kim, Hyoung-Keun Oh","doi":"10.4055/cios24150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to report the radiological outcomes and risk factors for malalignment of fractures in the distal one-fourth of the tibia treated with intramedullary nailing via the infrapatellar approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively analyzed 60 patients (37 men and 23 women; mean age, 45.4 years) who had distal one-fourth tibial fractures and were treated with intramedullary nailing using the infrapatellar approach. These patients were treated between January 2009 and December 2021, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Fractures were classified according to the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association system: 25 were type 42A, 30 were type 42B, and 5 were type 43A. Radiographic outcomes focused on bone union and malalignment, defined as a valgus deviation greater than 5° compared to the unaffected side. Potential risk factors for malalignment, including open fractures (9 cases, 15%), distal tibial extension (20 cases, 33%), and distal fibular fractures (24 cases, 40%), were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bone union was achieved in all cases, with an average duration of 3.2 months (range, 3-5 months). No cases of postoperative wound infection or neurovascular damage were observed. The average coronal plane malalignment was 2.6° of valgus (range, 0°-9.3°), with significant malalignment (over 5°) occurring in 5 patients (8.3%). Comparison of the malalignment (n = 5) and normal (n = 55) groups showed a statistically significant difference in distal bone fragment length (average, 66.5 mm vs. 77.2 mm; <i>p</i> = 0.008) but no significant differences in other variables. A change-point analysis revealed that cases with a primary fracture line < 65 mm showed 4.5° of coronal malalignment, while those with > 65 mm showed 2.3°; the difference was statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intramedullary nailing using the infrapatellar approach for distal one-fourth tibial fractures results in successful bone union with a low incidence of valgus malalignment. However, careful attention is necessary to prevent angular deformities, especially when the distal fragment is short.</p>","PeriodicalId":47648,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"17 1","pages":"39-45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11791485/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios24150","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to report the radiological outcomes and risk factors for malalignment of fractures in the distal one-fourth of the tibia treated with intramedullary nailing via the infrapatellar approach.
Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 60 patients (37 men and 23 women; mean age, 45.4 years) who had distal one-fourth tibial fractures and were treated with intramedullary nailing using the infrapatellar approach. These patients were treated between January 2009 and December 2021, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Fractures were classified according to the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association system: 25 were type 42A, 30 were type 42B, and 5 were type 43A. Radiographic outcomes focused on bone union and malalignment, defined as a valgus deviation greater than 5° compared to the unaffected side. Potential risk factors for malalignment, including open fractures (9 cases, 15%), distal tibial extension (20 cases, 33%), and distal fibular fractures (24 cases, 40%), were documented.
Results: Bone union was achieved in all cases, with an average duration of 3.2 months (range, 3-5 months). No cases of postoperative wound infection or neurovascular damage were observed. The average coronal plane malalignment was 2.6° of valgus (range, 0°-9.3°), with significant malalignment (over 5°) occurring in 5 patients (8.3%). Comparison of the malalignment (n = 5) and normal (n = 55) groups showed a statistically significant difference in distal bone fragment length (average, 66.5 mm vs. 77.2 mm; p = 0.008) but no significant differences in other variables. A change-point analysis revealed that cases with a primary fracture line < 65 mm showed 4.5° of coronal malalignment, while those with > 65 mm showed 2.3°; the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.01).
Conclusions: Intramedullary nailing using the infrapatellar approach for distal one-fourth tibial fractures results in successful bone union with a low incidence of valgus malalignment. However, careful attention is necessary to prevent angular deformities, especially when the distal fragment is short.