Does the Proximal Humerus Nail with 2 Distal Screws Provide Sufficient Rotational Stability?

IF 1.9 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-06 DOI:10.4055/cios23150
Ki Yong An, Tae Gyu Park, Min Young Kim
{"title":"Does the Proximal Humerus Nail with 2 Distal Screws Provide Sufficient Rotational Stability?","authors":"Ki Yong An, Tae Gyu Park, Min Young Kim","doi":"10.4055/cios23150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgroud: </strong>Proximal humerus nails, frequently used for managing proximal humerus fractures, significantly enhance rotational stability and reinforce fractured fragments. Few research exists regarding the optimal number and positioning of distal screws. This study aimed to assess the stability of diverse screw configurations and scrutinize screw distribution and bone stress via finite element analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The humerus intramedullary nail (Humerus Interlocking Nail System; TDM) underwent assessment using finite element analysis applied to a humerus model. Three groups were established based on varying distal screw numbers and locations: all 3 distal locking holes were used in group 1; 2 screws (dynamic hole and proximal static hole) in group 2, and 2 screws (dynamic hole and distal static hole) in group 3. Finite element analysis computed stress distribution within the implant and bone for each group. A 1-mm fracture gap was simulated at the surgical neck, and stress distributions were analyzed in both normal and osteoporotic bone models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using two screws did not compromise rotational stability. Stress distribution analysis revealed stability across all groups without reaching failure strength. Group 3 exhibited a minor rise in component 11 (direct stress [force per unit area] acting on the positive and negative 1 faces in the 1-axis. direction) and component 22 (direct stress [force per unit area] acting on the positive and negative 2 faces in the 2-axis direction) stress, remaining below failure strength thresholds. Group 1 exhibited the lowest von Mises stress in the nail and screws, while groups 2 and 3 did not reach failure strength levels. Findings remained consistent in the osteoporotic model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All 3 groups demonstrated rotational stability concerning stress distribution, indicating that using 2 screws for distal fixation does not adversely affect stability. This suggests the potential for saving surgical time and reducing radiation exposure without compromising stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":47648,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"17 1","pages":"148-156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11791494/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios23150","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgroud: Proximal humerus nails, frequently used for managing proximal humerus fractures, significantly enhance rotational stability and reinforce fractured fragments. Few research exists regarding the optimal number and positioning of distal screws. This study aimed to assess the stability of diverse screw configurations and scrutinize screw distribution and bone stress via finite element analysis.

Methods: The humerus intramedullary nail (Humerus Interlocking Nail System; TDM) underwent assessment using finite element analysis applied to a humerus model. Three groups were established based on varying distal screw numbers and locations: all 3 distal locking holes were used in group 1; 2 screws (dynamic hole and proximal static hole) in group 2, and 2 screws (dynamic hole and distal static hole) in group 3. Finite element analysis computed stress distribution within the implant and bone for each group. A 1-mm fracture gap was simulated at the surgical neck, and stress distributions were analyzed in both normal and osteoporotic bone models.

Results: Using two screws did not compromise rotational stability. Stress distribution analysis revealed stability across all groups without reaching failure strength. Group 3 exhibited a minor rise in component 11 (direct stress [force per unit area] acting on the positive and negative 1 faces in the 1-axis. direction) and component 22 (direct stress [force per unit area] acting on the positive and negative 2 faces in the 2-axis direction) stress, remaining below failure strength thresholds. Group 1 exhibited the lowest von Mises stress in the nail and screws, while groups 2 and 3 did not reach failure strength levels. Findings remained consistent in the osteoporotic model.

Conclusions: All 3 groups demonstrated rotational stability concerning stress distribution, indicating that using 2 screws for distal fixation does not adversely affect stability. This suggests the potential for saving surgical time and reducing radiation exposure without compromising stability.

肱骨近端钉加2枚远端螺钉是否提供足够的旋转稳定性?
背景:肱骨近端钉常用于治疗肱骨近端骨折,可显著提高旋转稳定性并加固骨折碎片。关于远端螺钉最佳数量和定位的研究很少。本研究旨在通过有限元分析评估不同螺钉配置的稳定性,并仔细检查螺钉分布和骨应力。方法:肱骨髓内钉(肱骨交锁钉系统);采用肱骨模型的有限元分析对TDM进行评估。根据不同的远端螺钉数量和位置分为三组:第一组使用所有3个远端锁定孔;2组2枚螺钉(动态孔和近端静态孔),3组2枚螺钉(动态孔和远端静态孔)。有限元分析计算各组种植体和骨内的应力分布。在手术颈部模拟1 mm骨折间隙,分析正常骨模型和骨质疏松骨模型的应力分布。结果:使用两枚螺钉不影响旋转稳定性。应力分布分析显示各组均稳定,未达到破坏强度。第3组表现出作用于1轴正、负1面的分量11(直接应力[单位面积的力])的轻微上升。方向)和分量22(直接应力[单位面积的力]作用在2轴方向的正负2面)应力,保持在破坏强度阈值以下。组1的von Mises应力最低,组2和组3均未达到破坏强度水平。结果在骨质疏松模型中保持一致。结论:所有3组在应力分布方面均表现出旋转稳定性,表明使用2枚螺钉进行远端固定不会对稳定性产生不利影响。这表明在不影响稳定性的情况下节省手术时间和减少辐射暴露的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信