Leveraging Communities of Practice to Support Translation of Knowledge Into Action Among State, Tribal, Local, and Territorial Public Health Agencies: Lessons Learned From the COVID-19 Pandemic.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Alyssa Bosold, Rachel Machta, Jackie Brenner, Deborah S Porterfield
{"title":"Leveraging Communities of Practice to Support Translation of Knowledge Into Action Among State, Tribal, Local, and Territorial Public Health Agencies: Lessons Learned From the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Alyssa Bosold, Rachel Machta, Jackie Brenner, Deborah S Porterfield","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, communities of practice (CoPs) supported state, Tribal, local, and territorial (STLT) public health agencies. No studies have examined the collective role of these CoPs in helping STLT public health agencies translate guidance into practice.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This qualitative study examines the types of CoPs that supported STLT public health agencies during the COVID-19 response, how CoPs assisted in translating guidance into practice, and the characteristics of CoPs that made them valuable to STLT public health members. We report lessons for future public health emergencies (PHEs) for STLT public health agencies and membership organizations that represent them.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted 21 in-depth interviews with CoP leaders, STLT public health participants, and federal agency sponsors and collaborators.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>We interviewed 9 CoP leads, 6 STLT participants, and 6 federal agency representatives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three types of CoPs, each with unique advantages, supported STLT public health agencies during the COVID-19 pandemic: (1) CoPs led by federal agencies, (2) CoPs led by membership organizations or associations that represent STLT public health agencies, and (3) CoPs led by other nonfederal organizations, such as philanthropic organizations and academic institutions. The most valuable CoPs to STLT public health agencies had a clear focus on issues of significance to their members, strong connections between members, and a structure tailored to the group's goals. STLT public health agencies valued CoP support with implementing guidance-based policies and practices and facilitating bidirectional communication with federal agencies. STLT public health agencies also benefitted from tailored and implementation-focused resources developed through CoPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study affirms the importance of CoPs in facilitating collaboration and information-sharing among multiple actors during PHEs. During the COVID-19 pandemic, CoPs helped STLT public health agencies implement guidance, tailor approaches to specific contexts, and generate practice-based discoveries to advance the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002114","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: During the COVID-19 pandemic, communities of practice (CoPs) supported state, Tribal, local, and territorial (STLT) public health agencies. No studies have examined the collective role of these CoPs in helping STLT public health agencies translate guidance into practice.

Objectives: This qualitative study examines the types of CoPs that supported STLT public health agencies during the COVID-19 response, how CoPs assisted in translating guidance into practice, and the characteristics of CoPs that made them valuable to STLT public health members. We report lessons for future public health emergencies (PHEs) for STLT public health agencies and membership organizations that represent them.

Design: We conducted 21 in-depth interviews with CoP leaders, STLT public health participants, and federal agency sponsors and collaborators.

Participants: We interviewed 9 CoP leads, 6 STLT participants, and 6 federal agency representatives.

Results: Three types of CoPs, each with unique advantages, supported STLT public health agencies during the COVID-19 pandemic: (1) CoPs led by federal agencies, (2) CoPs led by membership organizations or associations that represent STLT public health agencies, and (3) CoPs led by other nonfederal organizations, such as philanthropic organizations and academic institutions. The most valuable CoPs to STLT public health agencies had a clear focus on issues of significance to their members, strong connections between members, and a structure tailored to the group's goals. STLT public health agencies valued CoP support with implementing guidance-based policies and practices and facilitating bidirectional communication with federal agencies. STLT public health agencies also benefitted from tailored and implementation-focused resources developed through CoPs.

Conclusion: Our study affirms the importance of CoPs in facilitating collaboration and information-sharing among multiple actors during PHEs. During the COVID-19 pandemic, CoPs helped STLT public health agencies implement guidance, tailor approaches to specific contexts, and generate practice-based discoveries to advance the field.

利用实践社区支持州、部落、地方和地区公共卫生机构将知识转化为行动:从COVID-19大流行中吸取的经验教训。
背景:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,实践社区(cop)支持州、部落、地方和领土(STLT)公共卫生机构。没有研究考察这些cop在帮助STLT公共卫生机构将指导转化为实践方面的集体作用。目的:本定性研究考察了在2019冠状病毒病应对期间支持STLT公共卫生机构的cop类型,cop如何协助将指导转化为实践,以及cop对STLT公共卫生成员有价值的特征。我们为STLT公共卫生机构和代表它们的会员组织报告未来突发公共卫生事件(phe)的经验教训。设计:我们对缔约方会议领导人、STLT公共卫生参与者、联邦机构发起人和合作者进行了21次深度访谈。参与者:我们采访了9名CoP领导,6名STLT参与者和6名联邦机构代表。结果:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,三种类型的cop支持STLT公共卫生机构,每种cop都有其独特的优势:(1)联邦机构领导的cop,(2)代表STLT公共卫生机构的会员组织或协会领导的cop,以及(3)其他非联邦组织(如慈善组织和学术机构)领导的cop。对STLT公共卫生机构最有价值的cop明确关注对其成员具有重要意义的问题,成员之间建立了牢固的联系,并建立了适合该组织目标的结构。STLT公共卫生机构重视缔约方会议在实施基于指南的政策和做法以及促进与联邦机构的双向沟通方面的支持。STLT公共卫生机构也受益于通过缔约方会议开发的量身定制和注重实施的资源。结论:我们的研究证实了cop在促进phe期间多个参与者之间的协作和信息共享方面的重要性。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,cop帮助STLT公共卫生机构实施指导,针对具体情况量身定制方法,并产生基于实践的发现,以推动该领域的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
287
期刊介绍: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信