Government and farmer responses to the fall armyworm outbreak in mainland Southeast Asia.

IF 2.4 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY
Frontiers in insect science Pub Date : 2025-01-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/finsc.2024.1455585
Eiichi Kusano, Nipon Poapongsakorn, Urairat Jantarasiri, Kamphol Pantakua, Cuong H Tran, Khin Akari Tar, Thong Kong, Viengsavanh V Phimphachanhvongsod, Youichi Kobori
{"title":"Government and farmer responses to the fall armyworm outbreak in mainland Southeast Asia.","authors":"Eiichi Kusano, Nipon Poapongsakorn, Urairat Jantarasiri, Kamphol Pantakua, Cuong H Tran, Khin Akari Tar, Thong Kong, Viengsavanh V Phimphachanhvongsod, Youichi Kobori","doi":"10.3389/finsc.2024.1455585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Native to the Americas and highly polyphagous, the fall armyworm (FAW), <i>Spodoptera frugiperda</i> (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) has garnered attention for causing significant damage, primarily to maize.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study synthesizes FAW emergence, government responses, and farmer reactions in mainland Southeast Asia (MSEA), and assesses the feasibility of government-recommended measures in terms of efficacy and cost-efficiency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From late 2018 to the rainy season of 2019, FAW infestations extensively emerged in MSEA maize fields. MSEA governments promptly issued strategies and guidelines through plant protection divisions/departments, which involved international organizations, foreign governments, and private web portals. Alongside the foliar application of emamectin benzoate (EMB), which is the most frequently mentioned method, MSEA governments advocated for integrated pest management (IPM)-oriented approaches. These include application methods of chemical insecticides, use of host plant resistance, biological control, cultural and interference methods, and local measures aimed at reducing chemical usage. Despite comprehensive recommendations, maize farmers primarily rely on EMB foliar treatment for FAW control.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We highlight the need for further research and dissemination regarding the widely accepted foliar application of chemical insecticides, specifically in relation to human safety, improvements in application technology, and clear guidelines for large-scale outbreaks. On the other hand, the concentrative foliar application of chemical insecticides raises concerns about resistance evolution. Alternatives to foliar treatment with chemical insecticides, mainly EMB, such as seed treatment with diamides and neonicotinoids, genetically modified maize seeds approved only in Vietnam, and biological control, have demonstrated efficacy. Seed treatment provides cost and labor benefits for early-stage FAW infestation prevention. Validation of natural enemy rearing costs may prove advantageous as preliminary estimates suggest they could be relatively low. Not all strategies recommended by the government or widely discussed are necessarily relevant at farm-level. This study provides the following suggestions for the proposal of more acceptable strategies. 1) Studying the actual responses of governments and farmers with special emphasis on cost efficiency; 2) Making alternatives to EMB foliar application more cost-effective inclusive of the cost of labor; and finally, 3) Verifying the effectiveness of the alternative techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":517424,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in insect science","volume":"4 ","pages":"1455585"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11794807/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in insect science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/finsc.2024.1455585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Native to the Americas and highly polyphagous, the fall armyworm (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) has garnered attention for causing significant damage, primarily to maize.

Methods: This study synthesizes FAW emergence, government responses, and farmer reactions in mainland Southeast Asia (MSEA), and assesses the feasibility of government-recommended measures in terms of efficacy and cost-efficiency.

Results: From late 2018 to the rainy season of 2019, FAW infestations extensively emerged in MSEA maize fields. MSEA governments promptly issued strategies and guidelines through plant protection divisions/departments, which involved international organizations, foreign governments, and private web portals. Alongside the foliar application of emamectin benzoate (EMB), which is the most frequently mentioned method, MSEA governments advocated for integrated pest management (IPM)-oriented approaches. These include application methods of chemical insecticides, use of host plant resistance, biological control, cultural and interference methods, and local measures aimed at reducing chemical usage. Despite comprehensive recommendations, maize farmers primarily rely on EMB foliar treatment for FAW control.

Discussion: We highlight the need for further research and dissemination regarding the widely accepted foliar application of chemical insecticides, specifically in relation to human safety, improvements in application technology, and clear guidelines for large-scale outbreaks. On the other hand, the concentrative foliar application of chemical insecticides raises concerns about resistance evolution. Alternatives to foliar treatment with chemical insecticides, mainly EMB, such as seed treatment with diamides and neonicotinoids, genetically modified maize seeds approved only in Vietnam, and biological control, have demonstrated efficacy. Seed treatment provides cost and labor benefits for early-stage FAW infestation prevention. Validation of natural enemy rearing costs may prove advantageous as preliminary estimates suggest they could be relatively low. Not all strategies recommended by the government or widely discussed are necessarily relevant at farm-level. This study provides the following suggestions for the proposal of more acceptable strategies. 1) Studying the actual responses of governments and farmers with special emphasis on cost efficiency; 2) Making alternatives to EMB foliar application more cost-effective inclusive of the cost of labor; and finally, 3) Verifying the effectiveness of the alternative techniques.

政府和农民对东南亚大陆秋粘虫爆发的反应。
简介:原产于美洲,高度多食的秋粘虫(FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith)(鳞翅目:夜蛾科)因对玉米造成重大危害而引起了人们的关注。方法:本研究综合了东南亚大陆(MSEA)地区的FAW发生、政府反应和农民反应,并从效果和成本效益两方面评估政府推荐措施的可行性。结果:2018年末至2019年雨季,MSEA玉米田普遍出现FAW侵染。东南亚各国政府迅速通过植物保护部门(包括国际组织、外国政府和民间门户网站)发布战略和指导方针。除了最常被提及的叶面施用苯甲酸埃维菌素(EMB)外,东南亚各国政府还提倡以害虫综合治理(IPM)为导向的方法。这些措施包括化学杀虫剂的施用方法、利用寄主植物的抗性、生物防治、培养和干扰方法,以及旨在减少化学品使用的地方措施。尽管有全面的建议,但玉米农民主要依靠EMB叶面处理来控制FAW。讨论:我们强调需要进一步研究和传播广泛接受的叶面施用化学杀虫剂,特别是与人体安全、改进施用技术和大规模暴发的明确准则有关的研究和传播。另一方面,化学杀虫剂的集中叶面施用引起了对抗性进化的关注。用化学杀虫剂(主要是EMB)替代叶面杀虫剂,如用二胺类和新烟碱类杀虫剂处理种子、仅在越南批准的转基因玉米种子以及生物防治,已证明有效。种子处理为早期防治一汽害虫提供了成本和劳动力效益。对天敌饲养成本的确认可能是有利的,因为初步估计表明它们可能相对较低。并非所有政府推荐或广泛讨论的策略都与农场层面相关。本研究提供了以下建议,以提出更可接受的策略。1)研究政府和农民的实际反应,特别强调成本效率;2)使EMB叶面应用的替代方案更具成本效益,包括人工成本;最后,3)验证替代技术的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信