Imaging in clinical trials for psoriatic arthritis: a scoping review.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Skeletal Radiology Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1007/s00256-025-04884-8
Andrew Xiao, Ainge Roy, Liz Dennett, Elaine Yacyshyn, Matthew D Li
{"title":"Imaging in clinical trials for psoriatic arthritis: a scoping review.","authors":"Andrew Xiao, Ainge Roy, Liz Dennett, Elaine Yacyshyn, Matthew D Li","doi":"10.1007/s00256-025-04884-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory condition principally affecting the skin and musculoskeletal system, associated with comorbidities and decreased quality of life. Imaging is crucial for diagnosis, monitoring progression, and evaluating treatment efficacy; therefore, it plays an important role in PsA clinical trials. In this review, we aimed to characterize how imaging modalities and advances in imaging techniques are being used specifically in the PsA clinical trial literature. Following the Arksey and O'Malley framework for scoping reviews, we conducted a comprehensive search of multiple literature databases, from January 1, 2000, to June 27, 2024. We captured 1961 articles and after deduplication, title and abstract screening, and full-text review, 53 studies were included. Radiographs were the most used imaging modality (n = 32/53, 60%), and radiographic progression was frequently measured using the PsA-modified Sharp/van der Heijde score. MRI (n = 16/53, 30%) was used in evaluating peripheral and axial disease, with more recent adoption of validated scoring systems (PsAMRIS and SPARCC). Ultrasound (n = 11/53, 21%), including power Doppler, was used to assess soft tissue inflammation. Standardized scoring systems (e.g. GLOESS) were used in a minority of ultrasound-based studies. Multimodality imaging (n = 7/53, 13%) and CT (n = 2/53, 4%) was uncommon. The development of PsA-specific scoring systems for radiographs and MRI has been instrumental in advancing imaging assessment in PsA. However, their application remains limited, particularly in ultrasound, where further standardization is needed. Future clinical trials should focus on increasing the adoption of PsA-specific scoring systems, exploring advanced techniques (e.g. DCE-MRI), and multi-modal imaging to improve PsA disease monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":21783,"journal":{"name":"Skeletal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"2275-2289"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skeletal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-025-04884-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory condition principally affecting the skin and musculoskeletal system, associated with comorbidities and decreased quality of life. Imaging is crucial for diagnosis, monitoring progression, and evaluating treatment efficacy; therefore, it plays an important role in PsA clinical trials. In this review, we aimed to characterize how imaging modalities and advances in imaging techniques are being used specifically in the PsA clinical trial literature. Following the Arksey and O'Malley framework for scoping reviews, we conducted a comprehensive search of multiple literature databases, from January 1, 2000, to June 27, 2024. We captured 1961 articles and after deduplication, title and abstract screening, and full-text review, 53 studies were included. Radiographs were the most used imaging modality (n = 32/53, 60%), and radiographic progression was frequently measured using the PsA-modified Sharp/van der Heijde score. MRI (n = 16/53, 30%) was used in evaluating peripheral and axial disease, with more recent adoption of validated scoring systems (PsAMRIS and SPARCC). Ultrasound (n = 11/53, 21%), including power Doppler, was used to assess soft tissue inflammation. Standardized scoring systems (e.g. GLOESS) were used in a minority of ultrasound-based studies. Multimodality imaging (n = 7/53, 13%) and CT (n = 2/53, 4%) was uncommon. The development of PsA-specific scoring systems for radiographs and MRI has been instrumental in advancing imaging assessment in PsA. However, their application remains limited, particularly in ultrasound, where further standardization is needed. Future clinical trials should focus on increasing the adoption of PsA-specific scoring systems, exploring advanced techniques (e.g. DCE-MRI), and multi-modal imaging to improve PsA disease monitoring.

银屑病关节炎的影像学临床试验:范围审查。
银屑病关节炎(PsA)是一种慢性炎症性疾病,主要影响皮肤和肌肉骨骼系统,与合并症和生活质量下降有关。影像对诊断、监测进展和评估治疗效果至关重要;因此,它在PsA临床试验中发挥着重要作用。在这篇综述中,我们的目的是描述成像方式和成像技术的进步是如何在PsA临床试验文献中使用的。根据Arksey和O'Malley框架的范围评价,我们从2000年1月1日到2024年6月27日对多个文献数据库进行了全面的检索。我们收集了1961篇文章,经过重复数据删除、标题和摘要筛选以及全文审查,纳入了53篇研究。x线片是最常用的成像方式(n = 32/ 53,60%), x线片的进展通常使用psa改良的Sharp/van der Heijde评分进行测量。MRI (n = 16/ 53,30 %)用于评估外周和轴向疾病,最近更采用经过验证的评分系统(PsAMRIS和SPARCC)。超声(n = 11/ 53,21%),包括功率多普勒,用于评估软组织炎症。标准化评分系统(如GLOESS)在少数基于超声的研究中使用。多模态成像(n = 7/ 53,13 %)和CT (n = 2/ 53,4 %)不常见。放射照相和MRI的PsA特异性评分系统的发展有助于推进PsA的成像评估。然而,它们的应用仍然有限,特别是在超声方面,需要进一步标准化。未来的临床试验应侧重于增加PsA特异性评分系统的采用,探索先进技术(如DCE-MRI)和多模态成像来改善PsA疾病监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Skeletal Radiology
Skeletal Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.50%
发文量
253
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Skeletal Radiology provides a forum for the dissemination of current knowledge and information dealing with disorders of the musculoskeletal system including the spine. While emphasizing the radiological aspects of the many varied skeletal abnormalities, the journal also adopts an interdisciplinary approach, reflecting the membership of the International Skeletal Society. Thus, the anatomical, pathological, physiological, clinical, metabolic and epidemiological aspects of the many entities affecting the skeleton receive appropriate consideration. This is the Journal of the International Skeletal Society and the Official Journal of the Society of Skeletal Radiology and the Australasian Musculoskelelal Imaging Group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信