Robot-assisted Pelvic Reconstruction Using Rectus Abdominis Flap: Efficiency Evaluation of Adding a Third Surgeon.

IF 1.5 Q3 SURGERY
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2025-02-05 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006508
Matthew W Kelecy, Noama Iftekhar, Brett Allen, Edozie Ezeanolue, Richard C Baynosa
{"title":"Robot-assisted Pelvic Reconstruction Using Rectus Abdominis Flap: Efficiency Evaluation of Adding a Third Surgeon.","authors":"Matthew W Kelecy, Noama Iftekhar, Brett Allen, Edozie Ezeanolue, Richard C Baynosa","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The open rectus abdominis flap has long been a versatile workhorse in pelvic reconstruction. In an effort to reduce morbidity of open approach, robotic harvest techniques have been developed. Our institution previously published a retrospective study that compared outcomes between the robotic and open approaches between 2014 and 2019. Since then, our technique has evolved to include the addition of a general surgeon for simultaneous harvest site closure and flap insetting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an institutional review board-approved single-institution retrospective review of patients who underwent robotic rectus harvest using Da Vinci surgical system for perineal reconstruction between 2018 and June 2023. The dataset was stratified into patients who underwent 3-surgeon reconstruction versus 2-surgeon reconstruction. Data collected included demographics, risk factors, perioperative information, and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 21 patients underwent robotic rectus repair from 2018 to 2023 with operations occurring at 3 different hospitals. Of those patients 7 were excluded, resulting in 14 patients included for evaluation: 8 patients who underwent 3-surgeon operation and 6 in the 2-surgeon cohort. We found no difference in total operative time (508.1 versus 506.8, <i>P</i> = 0.48), total robotic console time (445.7 versus 424.0, <i>P</i> = 0.46), hospital length of stay (11.4 versus 8.0, <i>P</i> = 0.27), or overall complication rate (0.75 versus 0.83, <i>P</i> = 0.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although this is a small study, the data suggest that plastic surgeons trained in robotic techniques are well-equipped to perform the harvest, mesh repair, and flap inset without the addition of a general surgeon.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 2","pages":"e6508"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11798373/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The open rectus abdominis flap has long been a versatile workhorse in pelvic reconstruction. In an effort to reduce morbidity of open approach, robotic harvest techniques have been developed. Our institution previously published a retrospective study that compared outcomes between the robotic and open approaches between 2014 and 2019. Since then, our technique has evolved to include the addition of a general surgeon for simultaneous harvest site closure and flap insetting.

Methods: This is an institutional review board-approved single-institution retrospective review of patients who underwent robotic rectus harvest using Da Vinci surgical system for perineal reconstruction between 2018 and June 2023. The dataset was stratified into patients who underwent 3-surgeon reconstruction versus 2-surgeon reconstruction. Data collected included demographics, risk factors, perioperative information, and postoperative outcomes.

Results: In total, 21 patients underwent robotic rectus repair from 2018 to 2023 with operations occurring at 3 different hospitals. Of those patients 7 were excluded, resulting in 14 patients included for evaluation: 8 patients who underwent 3-surgeon operation and 6 in the 2-surgeon cohort. We found no difference in total operative time (508.1 versus 506.8, P = 0.48), total robotic console time (445.7 versus 424.0, P = 0.46), hospital length of stay (11.4 versus 8.0, P = 0.27), or overall complication rate (0.75 versus 0.83, P = 0.36).

Conclusions: Although this is a small study, the data suggest that plastic surgeons trained in robotic techniques are well-equipped to perform the harvest, mesh repair, and flap inset without the addition of a general surgeon.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信