Multidimensional outcome of first-episode psychosis: a network analysis.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Manuel J Cuesta, Gustavo J Gil-Berrozpe, Ana M Sánchez-Torres, Lucía Moreno-Izco, Elena García de Jalón, Víctor Peralta
{"title":"Multidimensional outcome of first-episode psychosis: a network analysis.","authors":"Manuel J Cuesta, Gustavo J Gil-Berrozpe, Ana M Sánchez-Torres, Lucía Moreno-Izco, Elena García de Jalón, Víctor Peralta","doi":"10.1017/S0033291724003465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few studies have examined the long-term outcomes of first-episode psychosis (FEP) among patients beyond symptomatic and functional remission. This study aimed to broaden the scope of outcome indicators by examining the relationships between 12 outcomes of FEP patients at 20.9 years after their initial diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At follow-up, 220 out of 550 original patients underwent a new assessment. Twelve outcomes were assessed via semistructured interviews and complementary scales: symptom severity, functional impairment, personal recovery, social disadvantage, physical health, number of suicide attempts, number of episodes, current drug use, dose-years of antipsychotics (DYAps), cognitive impairment, motor abnormalities, and DSM-5 final diagnosis. The relationships between these outcome measures were investigated using Spearman's correlation analysis and exploratory factor analysis, while the specific connections between outcomes were ascertained using network analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The outcomes were significantly correlated; specifically, symptom severity, functioning, and personal recovery showed the strongest correlations. Exploratory factor analysis of the 12 outcomes revealed two factors, with 11 of the 12 outcomes loading on the first factor. Network analysis revealed that symptom severity, functioning, social disadvantage, diagnosis, cognitive impairment, DYAps, and number of episodes were the most interconnected outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Network analysis provided new insights into the heterogeneity between outcomes among patients with FEP. By considering outcomes beyond symptom severity, the rich net of interconnections elucidated herein can facilitate the development of interventions that target potentially modifiable outcomes and generalize their impact on the most interconnected outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e29"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291724003465","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Few studies have examined the long-term outcomes of first-episode psychosis (FEP) among patients beyond symptomatic and functional remission. This study aimed to broaden the scope of outcome indicators by examining the relationships between 12 outcomes of FEP patients at 20.9 years after their initial diagnosis.

Methods: At follow-up, 220 out of 550 original patients underwent a new assessment. Twelve outcomes were assessed via semistructured interviews and complementary scales: symptom severity, functional impairment, personal recovery, social disadvantage, physical health, number of suicide attempts, number of episodes, current drug use, dose-years of antipsychotics (DYAps), cognitive impairment, motor abnormalities, and DSM-5 final diagnosis. The relationships between these outcome measures were investigated using Spearman's correlation analysis and exploratory factor analysis, while the specific connections between outcomes were ascertained using network analysis.

Results: The outcomes were significantly correlated; specifically, symptom severity, functioning, and personal recovery showed the strongest correlations. Exploratory factor analysis of the 12 outcomes revealed two factors, with 11 of the 12 outcomes loading on the first factor. Network analysis revealed that symptom severity, functioning, social disadvantage, diagnosis, cognitive impairment, DYAps, and number of episodes were the most interconnected outcomes.

Conclusion: Network analysis provided new insights into the heterogeneity between outcomes among patients with FEP. By considering outcomes beyond symptom severity, the rich net of interconnections elucidated herein can facilitate the development of interventions that target potentially modifiable outcomes and generalize their impact on the most interconnected outcomes.

首发精神病的多维结果:网络分析。
背景:很少有研究调查了症状和功能缓解后首发精神病(FEP)患者的长期预后。本研究旨在通过检查FEP患者在初次诊断后20.9年的12个结局之间的关系来扩大结局指标的范围。方法:在随访中,550例原始患者中有220例接受了新的评估。通过半结构化访谈和补充量表评估12项结果:症状严重程度、功能损害、个人恢复、社会不利、身体健康、自杀企图次数、发作次数、当前药物使用、抗精神病药物剂量-年(DYAps)、认知障碍、运动异常和DSM-5最终诊断。使用Spearman相关分析和探索性因子分析来研究这些结果之间的关系,使用网络分析来确定结果之间的具体联系。结果:两组疗效显著相关;具体而言,症状严重程度、功能和个人恢复表现出最强的相关性。12个结果的探索性因子分析揭示了两个因素,其中11个结果加载在第一个因素上。网络分析显示,症状严重程度、功能、社会劣势、诊断、认知障碍、dyap和发作次数是最相互关联的结果。结论:网络分析为FEP患者预后的异质性提供了新的见解。通过考虑症状严重程度以外的结果,本文阐明的丰富的相互联系网络可以促进针对潜在可修改结果的干预措施的发展,并将其影响推广到最相互关联的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信