Robustness of 18F-FDG PET Radiomic Features in Lung Cancer: Impact of Advanced Reconstruction Algorithm.

IF 1 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Pooja Dwivedi, Sagar Barage, Ashish Kumar Jha, Sayak Choudhury, Venkatesh Rangarajan
{"title":"Robustness of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET Radiomic Features in Lung Cancer: Impact of Advanced Reconstruction Algorithm.","authors":"Pooja Dwivedi, Sagar Barage, Ashish Kumar Jha, Sayak Choudhury, Venkatesh Rangarajan","doi":"10.2967/jnmt.124.268252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET radiomics is emerging as a promising tool to identify imaging biomarkers for quantifying intratumor heterogeneity in lung cancer. However, the robustness of PET radiomic features (RFs) is influenced by factors such as image reconstruction algorithms, tumor segmentation, and discretization. Although the impact of these factors on RFs has been explored, the specific influence of the advanced block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) reconstruction algorithm remains unclear. This study investigated the potential variations in PET RFs associated with different factors when using BSREM. <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective data of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET from 120 lung cancer patients were reconstructed twice using advanced BSREM and conventional ordered-subset expectation maximization methods. For each reconstruction set, 3 tumor segmentations were performed, including manual, 40% threshold, and Nestle methods. Two discretization methods using absolute and relative settings were applied for each dataset before RF extraction. Stable and robust RFs were assessed by the coefficient of variance and intraclass correlation coefficient, respectively. <b>Results:</b> High instability was exhibited by 19%, 33%, and 36% of RFs, with a coefficient of variation of more than 20% for reconstruction, segmentation, and discretization, respectively. Conversely, 60%, 19%, and 35% of RFs demonstrated robustness against these factors, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of more than 0.90. The comparative evaluation revealed significantly greater robustness for most RF subtypes in BSREM than in ordered-subset expectation maximization under varying segmentation and discretization conditions (<i>P</i> < 0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> The stability and robustness of PET RFs are enhanced if BSREM is applied rather than the conventional method. Study results suggest that the advanced reconstruction method could offer potential benefits in providing consistent PET-based radiomic analysis for improving diagnostic and prognostic value.</p>","PeriodicalId":16548,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nuclear medicine technology","volume":" ","pages":"50-56"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nuclear medicine technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.124.268252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

18F-FDG PET radiomics is emerging as a promising tool to identify imaging biomarkers for quantifying intratumor heterogeneity in lung cancer. However, the robustness of PET radiomic features (RFs) is influenced by factors such as image reconstruction algorithms, tumor segmentation, and discretization. Although the impact of these factors on RFs has been explored, the specific influence of the advanced block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) reconstruction algorithm remains unclear. This study investigated the potential variations in PET RFs associated with different factors when using BSREM. Methods: Retrospective data of 18F-FDG PET from 120 lung cancer patients were reconstructed twice using advanced BSREM and conventional ordered-subset expectation maximization methods. For each reconstruction set, 3 tumor segmentations were performed, including manual, 40% threshold, and Nestle methods. Two discretization methods using absolute and relative settings were applied for each dataset before RF extraction. Stable and robust RFs were assessed by the coefficient of variance and intraclass correlation coefficient, respectively. Results: High instability was exhibited by 19%, 33%, and 36% of RFs, with a coefficient of variation of more than 20% for reconstruction, segmentation, and discretization, respectively. Conversely, 60%, 19%, and 35% of RFs demonstrated robustness against these factors, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of more than 0.90. The comparative evaluation revealed significantly greater robustness for most RF subtypes in BSREM than in ordered-subset expectation maximization under varying segmentation and discretization conditions (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The stability and robustness of PET RFs are enhanced if BSREM is applied rather than the conventional method. Study results suggest that the advanced reconstruction method could offer potential benefits in providing consistent PET-based radiomic analysis for improving diagnostic and prognostic value.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of nuclear medicine technology
Journal of nuclear medicine technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信