Association Between Renal Pelvis Urine Density and the Risk of Infectious Complications after Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Journal of endourology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1089/end.2024.0578
Ufuk Caglar, Caglar Dizdaroglu, Resit Yusuf, Ufuk Can Aksu, Ali Ayranci, Omer Sarilar, Faruk Ozgor
{"title":"Association Between Renal Pelvis Urine Density and the Risk of Infectious Complications after Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery.","authors":"Ufuk Caglar, Caglar Dizdaroglu, Resit Yusuf, Ufuk Can Aksu, Ali Ayranci, Omer Sarilar, Faruk Ozgor","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Renal pelvis urine density (RPUD), as measured by computed tomography (CT), may serve as an effective predictor for pyonephrosis. Our objective was to evaluate the correlation between the likelihood of developing infectious complications post-retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and RPUD measurements obtained from preoperative CT scans. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> We retrospectively reviewed data from patients who underwent RIRS for kidney stone treatment at a tertiary care facility between June 2017 and June 2024, using the hospital's database. The patients were divided into two groups based on the development of postoperative infective complications. The groups were compared in terms of preoperative (demographic data, stone characteristic, and RPUD) and operation data. RPUD was measured by creating an ellipse much as possible area encompassing the renal pelvis on the treated side area encompassing the renal pelvis on the treated side, and the average Hounsfield unit (HU) value was recorded. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Postoperative infection developed in 31 of 588 patients (5.3%). The median RPUD value was 15 in the infective group and 8 in the noninfective group, with a statistically significant difference between the groups (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Body mass index, stone burden, stone density, and RPUD were associated with postoperative infection in the multivariate analysis (<i>p</i> = 0.001, <i>p</i> = 0.008, <i>p</i> = 0.007, and <i>p</i> = 0.001, respectively). Each unit increase in RPUD increased the risk of postoperative infection 1.107-fold. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated a significant relationship between RPUD value and the risk of postoperative infection, with an area under the curve of 0.742 (<i>p</i> = 0.001). When the RPUD cut-off value was accepted as 14, sensitivity was 0.613 and specificity was 0.779. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This study showed a significant association between HU values in RPUD and the risk of infectious complications following RIRS. This finding suggests that incorporating urine HU values from CT images into preoperative risk assessment could be crucial for infection prevention and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":"231-236"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0578","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Renal pelvis urine density (RPUD), as measured by computed tomography (CT), may serve as an effective predictor for pyonephrosis. Our objective was to evaluate the correlation between the likelihood of developing infectious complications post-retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and RPUD measurements obtained from preoperative CT scans. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from patients who underwent RIRS for kidney stone treatment at a tertiary care facility between June 2017 and June 2024, using the hospital's database. The patients were divided into two groups based on the development of postoperative infective complications. The groups were compared in terms of preoperative (demographic data, stone characteristic, and RPUD) and operation data. RPUD was measured by creating an ellipse much as possible area encompassing the renal pelvis on the treated side area encompassing the renal pelvis on the treated side, and the average Hounsfield unit (HU) value was recorded. Results: Postoperative infection developed in 31 of 588 patients (5.3%). The median RPUD value was 15 in the infective group and 8 in the noninfective group, with a statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.001). Body mass index, stone burden, stone density, and RPUD were associated with postoperative infection in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.001, p = 0.008, p = 0.007, and p = 0.001, respectively). Each unit increase in RPUD increased the risk of postoperative infection 1.107-fold. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated a significant relationship between RPUD value and the risk of postoperative infection, with an area under the curve of 0.742 (p = 0.001). When the RPUD cut-off value was accepted as 14, sensitivity was 0.613 and specificity was 0.779. Conclusion: This study showed a significant association between HU values in RPUD and the risk of infectious complications following RIRS. This finding suggests that incorporating urine HU values from CT images into preoperative risk assessment could be crucial for infection prevention and management.

肾盂尿密度与逆行肾内手术后感染并发症风险的关系。
导读:肾盂尿密度(RPUD),通过计算机断层扫描(CT)测量,可以作为肾盂肾脏病的有效预测指标。我们的目的是评估逆行肾内手术(RIRS)后发生感染性并发症的可能性与术前CT扫描获得的RPUD测量值之间的相关性。材料和方法:我们回顾性地回顾了2017年6月至2024年6月在一家三级医疗机构接受RIRS肾结石治疗的患者的数据,使用该医院的数据库。根据术后感染并发症的发生情况将患者分为两组。比较两组术前(人口学资料、结石特征、RPUD)和手术资料。RPUD的测量方法是在治疗侧的肾盂周围尽可能形成一个椭圆形区域,并将治疗侧的肾盂围成一个椭圆形区域,记录平均Hounsfield单位(HU)值。结果:588例患者术后发生感染31例(5.3%)。感染组RPUD中位数为15,非感染组为8,组间差异有统计学意义(p = 0.001)。多因素分析显示,体重指数、结石负担、结石密度和RPUD与术后感染相关(p = 0.001、p = 0.008、p = 0.007和p = 0.001)。RPUD每增加一个单位,术后感染风险增加1.107倍。受试者工作特征(ROC)分析显示RPUD值与术后感染风险有显著相关,曲线下面积为0.742 (p = 0.001)。当RPUD临界值为14时,敏感性为0.613,特异性为0.779。结论:本研究显示RPUD的HU值与rrs后感染并发症的风险有显著相关性。这一发现表明,将CT图像中的尿液HU值纳入术前风险评估可能对感染预防和管理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信