Clostridioides difficile infection study models and prospectives for probing the microbe-host interface.

IF 2.7 3区 生物学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY
Journal of Bacteriology Pub Date : 2025-03-20 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1128/jb.00407-24
Tatiana Zvonareva, David S Courson, Erin B Purcell
{"title":"<i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection study models and prospectives for probing the microbe-host interface.","authors":"Tatiana Zvonareva, David S Courson, Erin B Purcell","doi":"10.1128/jb.00407-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection (CDI) is an urgent public health threat with a high rate of recurrence and limited treatment options. <i>In vivo</i> models have been indispensable in understanding CDI pathophysiology and establishing treatment protocols and continue to be essential in pre-clinal testing. More importantly, <i>in vivo</i> models offer the opportunity to probe the complex systemic host response to the microbe, which is impossible to recapitulate <i>in vitro</i>. Nonetheless, constraints related to the availability of animal models, cost, ethical considerations, and regulatory control limit their accessibility for basic research. Furthermore, physiological and habitual divergences between animal models and humans often result in poor translatability to human patients. In addition to being more accessible, <i>in vitro</i> CDI models offer more control over experimental parameters and allow dynamic analysis of early infection. <i>In vitro</i> fermentation offers models for probing microbe-microbe and microbe-microbiome interactions, while continuous multi-stage platforms allow opportunities to study <i>C. difficile</i> pathophysiology and treatment in context with human-derived microbiota. However, these platforms are not suitable for probing the host-pathogen interface, leaving the challenge of modeling early CDI unanswered. As a result, alternative <i>in vitro</i> co-culture platforms are being developed. This review evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of each approach, as well as future directions for <i>C. difficile</i> research.</p>","PeriodicalId":15107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bacteriology","volume":" ","pages":"e0040724"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11925243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bacteriology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00407-24","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is an urgent public health threat with a high rate of recurrence and limited treatment options. In vivo models have been indispensable in understanding CDI pathophysiology and establishing treatment protocols and continue to be essential in pre-clinal testing. More importantly, in vivo models offer the opportunity to probe the complex systemic host response to the microbe, which is impossible to recapitulate in vitro. Nonetheless, constraints related to the availability of animal models, cost, ethical considerations, and regulatory control limit their accessibility for basic research. Furthermore, physiological and habitual divergences between animal models and humans often result in poor translatability to human patients. In addition to being more accessible, in vitro CDI models offer more control over experimental parameters and allow dynamic analysis of early infection. In vitro fermentation offers models for probing microbe-microbe and microbe-microbiome interactions, while continuous multi-stage platforms allow opportunities to study C. difficile pathophysiology and treatment in context with human-derived microbiota. However, these platforms are not suitable for probing the host-pathogen interface, leaving the challenge of modeling early CDI unanswered. As a result, alternative in vitro co-culture platforms are being developed. This review evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of each approach, as well as future directions for C. difficile research.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Bacteriology
Journal of Bacteriology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
9.40%
发文量
324
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bacteriology (JB) publishes research articles that probe fundamental processes in bacteria, archaea and their viruses, and the molecular mechanisms by which they interact with each other and with their hosts and their environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信