Clostridioides difficile infection study models and prospectives for probing the microbe-host interface.

IF 2.7 3区 生物学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY
Journal of Bacteriology Pub Date : 2025-03-20 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1128/jb.00407-24
Tatiana Zvonareva, David S Courson, Erin B Purcell
{"title":"<i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection study models and prospectives for probing the microbe-host interface.","authors":"Tatiana Zvonareva, David S Courson, Erin B Purcell","doi":"10.1128/jb.00407-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection (CDI) is an urgent public health threat with a high rate of recurrence and limited treatment options. <i>In vivo</i> models have been indispensable in understanding CDI pathophysiology and establishing treatment protocols and continue to be essential in pre-clinal testing. More importantly, <i>in vivo</i> models offer the opportunity to probe the complex systemic host response to the microbe, which is impossible to recapitulate <i>in vitro</i>. Nonetheless, constraints related to the availability of animal models, cost, ethical considerations, and regulatory control limit their accessibility for basic research. Furthermore, physiological and habitual divergences between animal models and humans often result in poor translatability to human patients. In addition to being more accessible, <i>in vitro</i> CDI models offer more control over experimental parameters and allow dynamic analysis of early infection. <i>In vitro</i> fermentation offers models for probing microbe-microbe and microbe-microbiome interactions, while continuous multi-stage platforms allow opportunities to study <i>C. difficile</i> pathophysiology and treatment in context with human-derived microbiota. However, these platforms are not suitable for probing the host-pathogen interface, leaving the challenge of modeling early CDI unanswered. As a result, alternative <i>in vitro</i> co-culture platforms are being developed. This review evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of each approach, as well as future directions for <i>C. difficile</i> research.</p>","PeriodicalId":15107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bacteriology","volume":" ","pages":"e0040724"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11925243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bacteriology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.00407-24","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is an urgent public health threat with a high rate of recurrence and limited treatment options. In vivo models have been indispensable in understanding CDI pathophysiology and establishing treatment protocols and continue to be essential in pre-clinal testing. More importantly, in vivo models offer the opportunity to probe the complex systemic host response to the microbe, which is impossible to recapitulate in vitro. Nonetheless, constraints related to the availability of animal models, cost, ethical considerations, and regulatory control limit their accessibility for basic research. Furthermore, physiological and habitual divergences between animal models and humans often result in poor translatability to human patients. In addition to being more accessible, in vitro CDI models offer more control over experimental parameters and allow dynamic analysis of early infection. In vitro fermentation offers models for probing microbe-microbe and microbe-microbiome interactions, while continuous multi-stage platforms allow opportunities to study C. difficile pathophysiology and treatment in context with human-derived microbiota. However, these platforms are not suitable for probing the host-pathogen interface, leaving the challenge of modeling early CDI unanswered. As a result, alternative in vitro co-culture platforms are being developed. This review evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of each approach, as well as future directions for C. difficile research.

艰难梭菌感染研究模型及其对微生物-宿主界面探测的展望。
艰难梭菌感染(CDI)是一种紧急的公共卫生威胁,复发率高,治疗方案有限。体内模型对于理解CDI病理生理和建立治疗方案是必不可少的,并且在临床前测试中仍然是必不可少的。更重要的是,体内模型提供了探索复杂的系统宿主对微生物的反应的机会,这在体外是不可能概括的。然而,与动物模型的可用性、成本、伦理考虑和监管控制有关的限制限制了它们在基础研究中的可及性。此外,动物模型和人类之间的生理和习惯差异往往导致对人类患者的可译性较差。除了更容易获得外,体外CDI模型提供了对实验参数的更多控制,并允许对早期感染进行动态分析。体外发酵为探索微生物-微生物和微生物-微生物组的相互作用提供了模型,而连续的多阶段平台为研究艰难梭菌的病理生理和人类来源的微生物群的治疗提供了机会。然而,这些平台不适合探测宿主-病原体界面,留下了早期CDI建模的挑战悬而未决。因此,替代体外共培养平台正在开发中。本文综述了每种方法的优缺点,以及艰难梭菌研究的未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Bacteriology
Journal of Bacteriology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
9.40%
发文量
324
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bacteriology (JB) publishes research articles that probe fundamental processes in bacteria, archaea and their viruses, and the molecular mechanisms by which they interact with each other and with their hosts and their environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信