Unveiling clinic variation in utilization of ICSI, PGT, and blastocyst transfer: a comprehensive study using the SART database (2014-2020).

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Andrew Claffey, Anh Ngo, Donald McIntire, Kathleen Doody, Kevin Doody
{"title":"Unveiling clinic variation in utilization of ICSI, PGT, and blastocyst transfer: a comprehensive study using the SART database (2014-2020).","authors":"Andrew Claffey, Anh Ngo, Donald McIntire, Kathleen Doody, Kevin Doody","doi":"10.1007/s10815-025-03413-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Many national recommendations have been made regarding practice patterns of assisted reproductive technology utilization (intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), and blastocyst stage embryo transfer). This study seeks to assess individual clinic changes in practice behaviors from 2014 to 2020 in response to national guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study examined data from individual clinics using the Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinical Outcome Reporting System (SART-CORS) database. Each clinic was weighed individually and equally regardless of clinic volume to avoid skewing national data with larger-volume clinics. The trends of ICSI, PGT, and blastocyst stage embryo transfer were examined across five age groups (< 35, 35-37, 38-40, 40-42, and > 42).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ICSI usage from 2014 to 2020 increased in all age groups (p < 0.001). In 2020, more than half the clinics in this study utilized ICSI in ≥ 90% of IVF cycles (per oocyte retrieval). Utilization of prolonged embryo culture increased in all age groups across the seven years of this study, with a more extensive adoption of this practice in patients ≤ 40 years (p < 0.001). Between 2014 and 2020, PGT usage increased by 3-4 times across all age groups (p < 0.001). By 2020, PGT was performed after egg retrievals in approximately 40 to 50% (mean) of patients < 42 years old.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nationally, the application of all three reproductive technologies (ICSI, PGT, and blastocyst stage transfer) has drastically increased. The authors suspect that these technology expansions are interrelated and may be associated with the rise of rates of PGT.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03413-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Many national recommendations have been made regarding practice patterns of assisted reproductive technology utilization (intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), and blastocyst stage embryo transfer). This study seeks to assess individual clinic changes in practice behaviors from 2014 to 2020 in response to national guidelines.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study examined data from individual clinics using the Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinical Outcome Reporting System (SART-CORS) database. Each clinic was weighed individually and equally regardless of clinic volume to avoid skewing national data with larger-volume clinics. The trends of ICSI, PGT, and blastocyst stage embryo transfer were examined across five age groups (< 35, 35-37, 38-40, 40-42, and > 42).

Results: ICSI usage from 2014 to 2020 increased in all age groups (p < 0.001). In 2020, more than half the clinics in this study utilized ICSI in ≥ 90% of IVF cycles (per oocyte retrieval). Utilization of prolonged embryo culture increased in all age groups across the seven years of this study, with a more extensive adoption of this practice in patients ≤ 40 years (p < 0.001). Between 2014 and 2020, PGT usage increased by 3-4 times across all age groups (p < 0.001). By 2020, PGT was performed after egg retrievals in approximately 40 to 50% (mean) of patients < 42 years old.

Conclusions: Nationally, the application of all three reproductive technologies (ICSI, PGT, and blastocyst stage transfer) has drastically increased. The authors suspect that these technology expansions are interrelated and may be associated with the rise of rates of PGT.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
286
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species. The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信