Perceptions, practices, and experiences of asthma patients and community pharmacists on short-acting beta-2 agonists inhaler use: A qualitative study.

IF 3.3 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2025.2455065
Rabia Hussain, Zhe Chi Loh, Bayan Faisal Ababneh, Jaya Muneswarao, Siew Chin Ong, Bandana Saini, Anees Ur-Rehman, Vibhu Paudyal
{"title":"Perceptions, practices, and experiences of asthma patients and community pharmacists on short-acting beta-2 agonists inhaler use: A qualitative study.","authors":"Rabia Hussain, Zhe Chi Loh, Bayan Faisal Ababneh, Jaya Muneswarao, Siew Chin Ong, Bandana Saini, Anees Ur-Rehman, Vibhu Paudyal","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2025.2455065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Short-acting beta-2 agonists (SABA) are bronchodilators that offer rapid relief for asthma patients experiencing acute symptoms. The availability of SABA inhalers without a prescription may exacerbate the overuse of SABA. This study aimed to explore the perceptions, practices, and experiences of asthma patients and community pharmacists toward using SABA inhalers in Malaysia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted among eleven asthma patients and twelve community pharmacists using semi-structured individual interviews. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim and then analyzed by thematic analysis. The findings were reported using the COREQ checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thematic analysis yielded eight major themes, (1) perceptions and understanding of good asthma control; (2) perceptions and experience towards asthma follow-up review; (3) perceptions of SABA's reliance; (4) practices towards the proper use of inhalers; (5) over-the-counter availability of SABA inhalers; (6) provision of pharmacists in SABA use assessment; (7) patients-healthcare professionals communication; and (8) recommendations for policymakers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most asthma patients and community pharmacists agreed that good asthma control was associated with reduced SABA usage and minimum asthma symptoms. The majority of patients claimed that visiting physicians for asthma follow-up reviews was unnecessary. Moreover, community pharmacists have raised concerns regarding patients' reliance on SABA inhalers due to the immediate relief effects, however, the majority of interviewed patients claimed that they did not rely on SABA inhalers. Additionally, community pharmacists were generally concerned about the frequency, dosage, and techniques using SABA inhalers. These concerns need to be addressed to improve the safe use of SABA inhalers. Language barriers, health literacy, long waiting times, and public education were the most important believed determinants of the safe use of SABA inhalers.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"18 1","pages":"2455065"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11795751/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2025.2455065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Short-acting beta-2 agonists (SABA) are bronchodilators that offer rapid relief for asthma patients experiencing acute symptoms. The availability of SABA inhalers without a prescription may exacerbate the overuse of SABA. This study aimed to explore the perceptions, practices, and experiences of asthma patients and community pharmacists toward using SABA inhalers in Malaysia.

Methods: A qualitative study was conducted among eleven asthma patients and twelve community pharmacists using semi-structured individual interviews. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim and then analyzed by thematic analysis. The findings were reported using the COREQ checklist.

Results: Thematic analysis yielded eight major themes, (1) perceptions and understanding of good asthma control; (2) perceptions and experience towards asthma follow-up review; (3) perceptions of SABA's reliance; (4) practices towards the proper use of inhalers; (5) over-the-counter availability of SABA inhalers; (6) provision of pharmacists in SABA use assessment; (7) patients-healthcare professionals communication; and (8) recommendations for policymakers.

Conclusion: Most asthma patients and community pharmacists agreed that good asthma control was associated with reduced SABA usage and minimum asthma symptoms. The majority of patients claimed that visiting physicians for asthma follow-up reviews was unnecessary. Moreover, community pharmacists have raised concerns regarding patients' reliance on SABA inhalers due to the immediate relief effects, however, the majority of interviewed patients claimed that they did not rely on SABA inhalers. Additionally, community pharmacists were generally concerned about the frequency, dosage, and techniques using SABA inhalers. These concerns need to be addressed to improve the safe use of SABA inhalers. Language barriers, health literacy, long waiting times, and public education were the most important believed determinants of the safe use of SABA inhalers.

哮喘患者和社区药剂师对短效β -2激动剂吸入器使用的认知、实践和经验:一项定性研究。
背景:短效β -2激动剂(SABA)是一种支气管扩张剂,可快速缓解哮喘患者的急性症状。没有处方的SABA吸入器的可用性可能加剧SABA的过度使用。本研究旨在探讨马来西亚哮喘患者和社区药剂师对使用沙巴吸入器的看法、做法和经验。方法:采用半结构化个人访谈法对11名哮喘患者和12名社区药师进行定性研究。所有访谈都录音并逐字抄录,然后进行专题分析。使用COREQ检查表报告研究结果。结果:专题分析得出八个主要主题:(1)对良好哮喘控制的认知和理解;(2)对哮喘随访评价的认识和体会;(3) SABA的信赖认知;(4)正确使用吸入器的做法;(5) SABA吸入器的非处方可用性;(6)药师在SABA使用评估中的规定;(7)医患沟通;(8)对政策制定者的建议。结论:大多数哮喘患者和社区药师一致认为,良好的哮喘控制与减少SABA的使用和减轻哮喘症状有关。大多数患者声称没有必要拜访医生进行哮喘随访检查。此外,由于SABA吸入器的即时缓解效果,社区药剂师对患者依赖SABA吸入器提出了担忧,然而,大多数受访患者声称他们并不依赖SABA吸入器。此外,社区药剂师普遍关注使用SABA吸入器的频率、剂量和技术。需要解决这些问题,以改善SABA吸入器的安全使用。语言障碍、卫生知识、漫长的等待时间和公众教育被认为是安全使用SABA吸入器的最重要决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信