Assessing diagnostic performance for common skin diseases using an AI-assisted tele-expertise platform: a proof of concept.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Florine Le Lay, Ouriel Barzilay, Damiano Cerasuolo, Hélène Roger, Rachel Abergel, Marie Jouandet, Priscille Carvalho-Lallement, Anne Dompmartin, Jean-Matthieu L'Orphelin
{"title":"Assessing diagnostic performance for common skin diseases using an AI-assisted tele-expertise platform: a proof of concept.","authors":"Florine Le Lay, Ouriel Barzilay, Damiano Cerasuolo, Hélène Roger, Rachel Abergel, Marie Jouandet, Priscille Carvalho-Lallement, Anne Dompmartin, Jean-Matthieu L'Orphelin","doi":"10.1684/ejd.2024.4804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advancements in machine learning (ML) are making artificial intelligence more feasible in dermatology, with promising results for diagnosing skin cancers, though few studies cover common or inflammatory dermatoses. To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy for common non-cancerous skin diseases and the clinical applicability of an ML model in practical telemedicine. A prospective, multi-centre, diagnostic accuracy study including patients with common dermatoses, between October 2022 and July 2023, was performed. The top three diagnoses (Top 1, Top 2 and Top 3) from the AI system, trained to recognize 25 common dermatoses based on skin lesion images and medical data, were compared to diagnoses by two dermatologists (gold standard) to calculate the AI model's diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Two versions of the AI software were evaluated: version 1 (V1) and version 2 (V2) with and without medical supervision (MS), referring to the use of metadata to control diagnostic predictions. Seventy participants and 195 photographs were included. The sensitivity and specificity of the Top 3 algorithm were 88% and 90%, respectively, for V2, with a significant improvement compared with V1. For V1, diagnostic accuracy was 0.57 (0.46;0.69) for Top 1, 0.70 (0.59;0.81) for Top 2, and 0.81 (0.72;0.91) for Top 3. For V2, diagnostic accuracy was 0.69 (0.58;0.79) and 0.71 (0.61;0.82) without and with MS, respectively, for Top 1; 0.87 (0.79;0.95) for Top 2; and 0.90 (0.83;0.97) for Top 3. Our AI model appears to be a promising tool for triaging and diagnosing skin lesions, especially for non-specialist physicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":11968,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dermatology","volume":"34 6","pages":"595-603"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2024.4804","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advancements in machine learning (ML) are making artificial intelligence more feasible in dermatology, with promising results for diagnosing skin cancers, though few studies cover common or inflammatory dermatoses. To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy for common non-cancerous skin diseases and the clinical applicability of an ML model in practical telemedicine. A prospective, multi-centre, diagnostic accuracy study including patients with common dermatoses, between October 2022 and July 2023, was performed. The top three diagnoses (Top 1, Top 2 and Top 3) from the AI system, trained to recognize 25 common dermatoses based on skin lesion images and medical data, were compared to diagnoses by two dermatologists (gold standard) to calculate the AI model's diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Two versions of the AI software were evaluated: version 1 (V1) and version 2 (V2) with and without medical supervision (MS), referring to the use of metadata to control diagnostic predictions. Seventy participants and 195 photographs were included. The sensitivity and specificity of the Top 3 algorithm were 88% and 90%, respectively, for V2, with a significant improvement compared with V1. For V1, diagnostic accuracy was 0.57 (0.46;0.69) for Top 1, 0.70 (0.59;0.81) for Top 2, and 0.81 (0.72;0.91) for Top 3. For V2, diagnostic accuracy was 0.69 (0.58;0.79) and 0.71 (0.61;0.82) without and with MS, respectively, for Top 1; 0.87 (0.79;0.95) for Top 2; and 0.90 (0.83;0.97) for Top 3. Our AI model appears to be a promising tool for triaging and diagnosing skin lesions, especially for non-specialist physicians.

使用人工智能辅助远程专家平台评估常见皮肤病的诊断效果:概念验证。
机器学习(ML)的进步使人工智能在皮肤病学中更加可行,在诊断皮肤癌方面取得了有希望的结果,尽管很少有研究涵盖常见或炎症性皮肤病。评价ML模型对常见非癌性皮肤病的诊断准确性及在实际远程医疗中的临床适用性。在2022年10月至2023年7月期间,对患有常见皮肤病的患者进行了一项前瞻性、多中心、诊断准确性研究。人工智能系统根据皮肤病变图像和医学数据训练识别25种常见皮肤病,并将前三名诊断结果(top 1、top 2和top 3)与两位皮肤科医生(金标准)的诊断结果进行比较,以计算人工智能模型的诊断准确性、灵敏度和特异性。评估了两个版本的人工智能软件:版本1 (V1)和版本2 (V2),有和没有医疗监督(MS),指的是使用元数据来控制诊断预测。其中包括70名参与者和195张照片。Top 3算法对V2的敏感性为88%,特异性为90%,较V1有显著提高。对于V1, Top 1的诊断准确率为0.57 (0.46;0.69),Top 2的诊断准确率为0.70 (0.59;0.81),Top 3的诊断准确率为0.81(0.72;0.91)。对于V2,无MS和有MS的诊断准确率分别为0.69(0.58;0.79)和0.71 (0.61;0.82);0.87 (0.79;0.95);前3名0.90(0.83;0.97)。我们的人工智能模型似乎是一个很有前途的工具,用于分诊和诊断皮肤病变,特别是对非专业医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Dermatology
European Journal of Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
129
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Dermatology is an internationally renowned journal for dermatologists and scientists involved in clinical dermatology and skin biology. Original articles on clinical dermatology, skin biology, immunology and cell biology are published, along with review articles, which offer readers a broader view of the available literature. Each issue also has an important correspondence section, which contains brief clinical and investigative reports and letters concerning articles previously published in the EJD. The policy of the EJD is to bring together a large network of specialists from all over the world through a series of editorial offices in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the USA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信