Effectiveness of Adjuvant Capecitabine in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients With Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Treatment: A Real-World Evidence Study in Korea.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Min Jeong Kim, Hyo Jung Kim, Ji-Yeon Kim, Junghoon Shin, Yeon Hee Park
{"title":"Effectiveness of Adjuvant Capecitabine in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients With Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Treatment: A Real-World Evidence Study in Korea.","authors":"Min Jeong Kim, Hyo Jung Kim, Ji-Yeon Kim, Junghoon Shin, Yeon Hee Park","doi":"10.1016/j.clbc.2024.12.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has important role in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). The CREATE-X study demonstrated a survival benefit from adjuvant capecitabine (adjC) in breast cancer patients, especially for TNBC populations. Because the landscape of early TNBC treatment has been changing rapidly, an optimal adjuvant strategy for real-world practice is needed. We evaluated the effectiveness of adjC in TNBC patients with residual disease after NAC.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used de-identified, anonymous data from an institutional clinical data warehouse to retrospectively analyze 934 TNBC patients who received NAC between 2017 and 2023. Among them, 405 patients received at least 1 cycle of adjC, and 77 received no adjuvant treatment. The primary outcomes of the study were distant-disease free survival (DDFS) rate and overall survival (OS) rate at 3 years. The secondary outcomes were subgroup analyses and Cox regression analyses of survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The median follow up period was 34.3 months (range 1.8-71.5). The DDFS rate at 3 years was higher in the capecitabine group: 86.3% of the capecitabine group and 74.4% of the no adjuvant group (P = .019). The OS rates at 3 years were 93.3% and 83.8%, respectively (P = .032). Subgroup analyses indicated a greater benefit from adjC in patients aged 50 years or older and those who received platinum-based NAC, both in terms of DDFS and OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study showed that adjC was more effective than no adjuvant treatment for TNBC patients with residual disease in terms of DDFS and OS.</p>","PeriodicalId":10197,"journal":{"name":"Clinical breast cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2024.12.019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has important role in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). The CREATE-X study demonstrated a survival benefit from adjuvant capecitabine (adjC) in breast cancer patients, especially for TNBC populations. Because the landscape of early TNBC treatment has been changing rapidly, an optimal adjuvant strategy for real-world practice is needed. We evaluated the effectiveness of adjC in TNBC patients with residual disease after NAC.

Method: We used de-identified, anonymous data from an institutional clinical data warehouse to retrospectively analyze 934 TNBC patients who received NAC between 2017 and 2023. Among them, 405 patients received at least 1 cycle of adjC, and 77 received no adjuvant treatment. The primary outcomes of the study were distant-disease free survival (DDFS) rate and overall survival (OS) rate at 3 years. The secondary outcomes were subgroup analyses and Cox regression analyses of survival outcomes.

Result: The median follow up period was 34.3 months (range 1.8-71.5). The DDFS rate at 3 years was higher in the capecitabine group: 86.3% of the capecitabine group and 74.4% of the no adjuvant group (P = .019). The OS rates at 3 years were 93.3% and 83.8%, respectively (P = .032). Subgroup analyses indicated a greater benefit from adjC in patients aged 50 years or older and those who received platinum-based NAC, both in terms of DDFS and OS.

Conclusion: Our study showed that adjC was more effective than no adjuvant treatment for TNBC patients with residual disease in terms of DDFS and OS.

辅助卡培他滨在新辅助治疗后残留疾病的三阴性乳腺癌患者中的有效性:韩国的真实世界证据研究
背景:新辅助化疗(NAC)后残留病变在三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)中起重要作用。CREATE-X研究表明,辅助卡培他滨(adjC)可改善乳腺癌患者的生存,特别是TNBC人群。由于早期TNBC治疗的前景正在迅速变化,因此需要一种适用于实际实践的最佳辅助策略。我们评估了ajc在TNBC患者NAC后残留疾病中的有效性。方法:我们使用来自机构临床数据仓库的去识别、匿名数据对2017年至2023年间接受NAC治疗的934例TNBC患者进行回顾性分析。其中405例患者接受了至少1个周期的adc治疗,77例患者未接受辅助治疗。研究的主要结果是3年的远端无病生存(DDFS)率和总生存(OS)率。次要结局为亚组分析和生存结局的Cox回归分析。结果:中位随访时间为34.3个月(1.8 ~ 71.5个月)。卡培他滨组3年DDFS率更高:卡培他滨组为86.3%,无辅助组为74.4% (P = 0.019)。3年生存率分别为93.3%、83.8% (P = 0.032)。亚组分析表明,在DDFS和OS方面,50岁或以上的患者和接受基于铂的NAC的患者接受adc的益处更大。结论:我们的研究表明,在DDFS和OS方面,adc辅助治疗比无辅助治疗对TNBC残留病患者更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical breast cancer
Clinical breast cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
174
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Breast Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of breast cancer. Clinical Breast Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to breast cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research reports from various therapeutic modalities, cancer genetics, drug sensitivity and resistance, novel imaging, tumor genomics, biomarkers, and chemoprevention strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信