Effectiveness of Adjuvant Capecitabine in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients With Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Treatment: A Real-World Evidence Study in Korea.
Min Jeong Kim, Hyo Jung Kim, Ji-Yeon Kim, Junghoon Shin, Yeon Hee Park
{"title":"Effectiveness of Adjuvant Capecitabine in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients With Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Treatment: A Real-World Evidence Study in Korea.","authors":"Min Jeong Kim, Hyo Jung Kim, Ji-Yeon Kim, Junghoon Shin, Yeon Hee Park","doi":"10.1016/j.clbc.2024.12.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has important role in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). The CREATE-X study demonstrated a survival benefit from adjuvant capecitabine (adjC) in breast cancer patients, especially for TNBC populations. Because the landscape of early TNBC treatment has been changing rapidly, an optimal adjuvant strategy for real-world practice is needed. We evaluated the effectiveness of adjC in TNBC patients with residual disease after NAC.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used de-identified, anonymous data from an institutional clinical data warehouse to retrospectively analyze 934 TNBC patients who received NAC between 2017 and 2023. Among them, 405 patients received at least 1 cycle of adjC, and 77 received no adjuvant treatment. The primary outcomes of the study were distant-disease free survival (DDFS) rate and overall survival (OS) rate at 3 years. The secondary outcomes were subgroup analyses and Cox regression analyses of survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The median follow up period was 34.3 months (range 1.8-71.5). The DDFS rate at 3 years was higher in the capecitabine group: 86.3% of the capecitabine group and 74.4% of the no adjuvant group (P = .019). The OS rates at 3 years were 93.3% and 83.8%, respectively (P = .032). Subgroup analyses indicated a greater benefit from adjC in patients aged 50 years or older and those who received platinum-based NAC, both in terms of DDFS and OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study showed that adjC was more effective than no adjuvant treatment for TNBC patients with residual disease in terms of DDFS and OS.</p>","PeriodicalId":10197,"journal":{"name":"Clinical breast cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical breast cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2024.12.019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has important role in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). The CREATE-X study demonstrated a survival benefit from adjuvant capecitabine (adjC) in breast cancer patients, especially for TNBC populations. Because the landscape of early TNBC treatment has been changing rapidly, an optimal adjuvant strategy for real-world practice is needed. We evaluated the effectiveness of adjC in TNBC patients with residual disease after NAC.
Method: We used de-identified, anonymous data from an institutional clinical data warehouse to retrospectively analyze 934 TNBC patients who received NAC between 2017 and 2023. Among them, 405 patients received at least 1 cycle of adjC, and 77 received no adjuvant treatment. The primary outcomes of the study were distant-disease free survival (DDFS) rate and overall survival (OS) rate at 3 years. The secondary outcomes were subgroup analyses and Cox regression analyses of survival outcomes.
Result: The median follow up period was 34.3 months (range 1.8-71.5). The DDFS rate at 3 years was higher in the capecitabine group: 86.3% of the capecitabine group and 74.4% of the no adjuvant group (P = .019). The OS rates at 3 years were 93.3% and 83.8%, respectively (P = .032). Subgroup analyses indicated a greater benefit from adjC in patients aged 50 years or older and those who received platinum-based NAC, both in terms of DDFS and OS.
Conclusion: Our study showed that adjC was more effective than no adjuvant treatment for TNBC patients with residual disease in terms of DDFS and OS.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Breast Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of breast cancer. Clinical Breast Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to breast cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research reports from various therapeutic modalities, cancer genetics, drug sensitivity and resistance, novel imaging, tumor genomics, biomarkers, and chemoprevention strategies.