Multicenter, retrospective GUIDANCE001 study comparing transarterial chemoembolization with or without tyrosine kinase and immune checkpoint inhibitors as conversion therapy to treat unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Survival benefit in intermediate or advanced, but not early, stages.

IF 12.9 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hepatology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1097/HEP.0000000000001229
Da-Long Yang, Lin Ye, Fan-Jian Zeng, Jie Liu, Hong-Bing Yao, Jun-Liang Nong, Shao-Ping Liu, Ning Peng, Wen-Feng Li, Pei-Sheng Wu, Chuang Qin, Ze Su, Jun-Jie Ou, Xiao-Feng Dong, Yi-He Yan, Teng-Meng Zhong, Xian-Shuang Mao, Ming-Song Wu, Yao-Zhi Chen, Guo-Dong Wang, Mian-Jing Li, Xue-Yao Wang, Fu-Quan Yang, Yong-Rong Liang, Shu-Chang Chen, Yong-Yu Yang, Kang Chen, Fu-Xin Li, Yong-Cheng Lai, Qing-Qing Pang, Xiu-Mei Liang, Xue-Mei You, Bang-De Xiang, Ya-Qun Yu, Liang Ma, Jian-Hong Zhong
{"title":"Multicenter, retrospective GUIDANCE001 study comparing transarterial chemoembolization with or without tyrosine kinase and immune checkpoint inhibitors as conversion therapy to treat unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Survival benefit in intermediate or advanced, but not early, stages.","authors":"Da-Long Yang, Lin Ye, Fan-Jian Zeng, Jie Liu, Hong-Bing Yao, Jun-Liang Nong, Shao-Ping Liu, Ning Peng, Wen-Feng Li, Pei-Sheng Wu, Chuang Qin, Ze Su, Jun-Jie Ou, Xiao-Feng Dong, Yi-He Yan, Teng-Meng Zhong, Xian-Shuang Mao, Ming-Song Wu, Yao-Zhi Chen, Guo-Dong Wang, Mian-Jing Li, Xue-Yao Wang, Fu-Quan Yang, Yong-Rong Liang, Shu-Chang Chen, Yong-Yu Yang, Kang Chen, Fu-Xin Li, Yong-Cheng Lai, Qing-Qing Pang, Xiu-Mei Liang, Xue-Mei You, Bang-De Xiang, Ya-Qun Yu, Liang Ma, Jian-Hong Zhong","doi":"10.1097/HEP.0000000000001229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Various conversion therapy options have become available to patients with unresectable HCC, but which conversion therapy is optimal for which type of patient is controversial. This study compared the efficacy and safety of TACE alone or combined with immune checkpoint and tyrosine kinase inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Approach and results: </strong>Data were retrospectively compared for patients with initially unresectable HCC who underwent conversion therapy consisting of TACE alone (n=459) or combined with immune checkpoint and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (n=343). Compared to the group that received TACE alone, the group that received triple conversion therapy showed significantly higher rates of overall survival (HR 0.43, 95%CI 0.35-0.53). In addition, triple therapy was associated with significantly longer median progression-free survival (15.9 vs. 8.0 mo, p <0.001). These results were confirmed in matched subsets of patients from each group. However, subgroup analysis confirmed the results only for patients with HCC in intermediate or advanced stages, not in an early stage. Those who received triple conversion therapy had a significantly higher rate of hepatectomy after conversion therapy (36.4 vs. 23.5%, p <0.001). Among those who underwent hepatectomy after conversion therapy, triple therapy was associated with a significantly higher rate of complete tumor response (32.1 vs. 11.1%, p <0.001). However, it was also associated with a significantly higher frequency of serious adverse events (35.6 vs. 27.0%, p =0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combining TACE with immune checkpoint and tyrosine kinase inhibitors was associated with significantly better survival and conversion efficacy than TACE alone among patients with intermediate or advanced unresectable HCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":177,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"357-369"},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HEP.0000000000001229","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Various conversion therapy options have become available to patients with unresectable HCC, but which conversion therapy is optimal for which type of patient is controversial. This study compared the efficacy and safety of TACE alone or combined with immune checkpoint and tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Approach and results: Data were retrospectively compared for patients with initially unresectable HCC who underwent conversion therapy consisting of TACE alone (n=459) or combined with immune checkpoint and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (n=343). Compared to the group that received TACE alone, the group that received triple conversion therapy showed significantly higher rates of overall survival (HR 0.43, 95%CI 0.35-0.53). In addition, triple therapy was associated with significantly longer median progression-free survival (15.9 vs. 8.0 mo, p <0.001). These results were confirmed in matched subsets of patients from each group. However, subgroup analysis confirmed the results only for patients with HCC in intermediate or advanced stages, not in an early stage. Those who received triple conversion therapy had a significantly higher rate of hepatectomy after conversion therapy (36.4 vs. 23.5%, p <0.001). Among those who underwent hepatectomy after conversion therapy, triple therapy was associated with a significantly higher rate of complete tumor response (32.1 vs. 11.1%, p <0.001). However, it was also associated with a significantly higher frequency of serious adverse events (35.6 vs. 27.0%, p =0.009).

Conclusions: Combining TACE with immune checkpoint and tyrosine kinase inhibitors was associated with significantly better survival and conversion efficacy than TACE alone among patients with intermediate or advanced unresectable HCC.

多中心、回顾性GUIDANCE001研究比较经动脉化疗栓塞加或不加酪氨酸激酶和免疫检查点抑制剂作为转换疗法治疗不可切除的肝细胞癌:中期或晚期的生存获益,但不是早期。
背景和目的:对于不可切除的HCC患者,有多种转换治疗方案可供选择,但哪种转换治疗对哪种类型的患者是最佳的仍存在争议。本研究比较了TACE单独或联合免疫检查点和酪氨酸激酶抑制剂的疗效和安全性。方法和结果:回顾性比较了最初不可切除的HCC患者的数据,这些患者接受了由TACE单独(n=459)或联合免疫检查点和酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(n=343)组成的转换治疗。与单独接受TACE治疗组相比,接受三重转换治疗组的总生存率明显更高(HR 0.43, 95%CI 0.35-0.53)。此外,三联治疗显著延长了中位无进展生存期(15.9个月vs 8.0个月)。结论:在中晚期不可切除的HCC患者中,TACE联合免疫检查点和酪氨酸激酶抑制剂的生存期和转化疗效明显优于TACE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hepatology
Hepatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
27.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
609
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: HEPATOLOGY is recognized as the leading publication in the field of liver disease. It features original, peer-reviewed articles covering various aspects of liver structure, function, and disease. The journal's distinguished Editorial Board carefully selects the best articles each month, focusing on topics including immunology, chronic hepatitis, viral hepatitis, cirrhosis, genetic and metabolic liver diseases, liver cancer, and drug metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信