Diffused responsibilities in technology-driven health research: The case of artificial intelligence systems in decentralized clinical trials

IF 6.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Sam H.A. Muller , Tessa I. van Rijssel , Ghislaine J.M.W. van Thiel, The Hypermarker Consortium , The Trials@Home Consortium
{"title":"Diffused responsibilities in technology-driven health research: The case of artificial intelligence systems in decentralized clinical trials","authors":"Sam H.A. Muller ,&nbsp;Tessa I. van Rijssel ,&nbsp;Ghislaine J.M.W. van Thiel,&nbsp;The Hypermarker Consortium ,&nbsp;The Trials@Home Consortium","doi":"10.1016/j.drudis.2025.104309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Innovations such as artificial intelligence (AI) and decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) offer opportunities to enhance trial quality and efficiency. However, these innovations raise ethical questions about key responsibilities in research, such as participant safety and data quality. Using an example of an AI system determining personalized medication dosages in a DCT, we highlight how these technologies diffuse responsibilities among multiple actors and technologies. Diffusion diminishes the ability of actors to fulfill responsibilities. To address this, leading actors, such as sponsors, should prioritize overseeing responsibility attribution and implementation. This involves mapping responsibilities, identifying risks and challenges for fulfilling these responsibilities, and organizing adequate communication channels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":301,"journal":{"name":"Drug Discovery Today","volume":"30 2","pages":"Article 104309"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Discovery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359644625000224","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Innovations such as artificial intelligence (AI) and decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) offer opportunities to enhance trial quality and efficiency. However, these innovations raise ethical questions about key responsibilities in research, such as participant safety and data quality. Using an example of an AI system determining personalized medication dosages in a DCT, we highlight how these technologies diffuse responsibilities among multiple actors and technologies. Diffusion diminishes the ability of actors to fulfill responsibilities. To address this, leading actors, such as sponsors, should prioritize overseeing responsibility attribution and implementation. This involves mapping responsibilities, identifying risks and challenges for fulfilling these responsibilities, and organizing adequate communication channels.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug Discovery Today
Drug Discovery Today 医学-药学
CiteScore
14.80
自引率
2.70%
发文量
293
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Drug Discovery Today delivers informed and highly current reviews for the discovery community. The magazine addresses not only the rapid scientific developments in drug discovery associated technologies but also the management, commercial and regulatory issues that increasingly play a part in how R&D is planned, structured and executed. Features include comment by international experts, news and analysis of important developments, reviews of key scientific and strategic issues, overviews of recent progress in specific therapeutic areas and conference reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信