Short-term load forecasting facilitated by edge data centres: A coordinated edge-cloud approach

IF 2.4 Q2 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
IET Smart Grid Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1049/stg2.12181
Junlong Li, Lurui Fang, Xiangyu Wei, Mengqiu Fang, Yue Xiang, Peipei You, Chao Zhang, Chenghong Gu
{"title":"Short-term load forecasting facilitated by edge data centres: A coordinated edge-cloud approach","authors":"Junlong Li,&nbsp;Lurui Fang,&nbsp;Xiangyu Wei,&nbsp;Mengqiu Fang,&nbsp;Yue Xiang,&nbsp;Peipei You,&nbsp;Chao Zhang,&nbsp;Chenghong Gu","doi":"10.1049/stg2.12181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Compared to load forecasting at the national level, two challenges arise in providing accurate forecasting for LV and MV networks: (1) customers within LV and MV networks are much less, implying greater volatility within those load profiles; (2) not all customers have smart metres. Particularly, the two challenges would exacerbate forecasting performance under unexpected events, such as extreme weather and COVID-19 outbreaks. To secure accurate short-term load forecasting for LV and MV networks, this paper customised a Spatio-Temporal Edge-Cloud-coordinated (STEC) approach on a loop training structure—LV networks to MV networks to LV networks. For each LV network, this approach utilises XGboost to learn the relationship between weather data, substation-side loads, and a few accessible customer-side load data to deliver rough forecasting. Then, it adopts the rough forecasting results and accessible data for all LV networks within an MV network to train the convolutional neural networks and gated recurrent unit (CNN-GRU) network. This step provides load forecasting for MV networks and simultaneously refines load forecasting for LV networks by generating the interacting relationship between LV substations of different locations. Case studies reveal that the STEC approach successfully extrapolates the demand-varying information from long-term datasets and improves short-term forecasting performance under both normal scenarios and newly occurring unexpected scenarios for LV and MV networks. The loop training structure halves the forecasting error, compared to classic methodology by utilising the local data only for MV networks.</p>","PeriodicalId":36490,"journal":{"name":"IET Smart Grid","volume":"7 6","pages":"829-842"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/stg2.12181","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Smart Grid","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/stg2.12181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Compared to load forecasting at the national level, two challenges arise in providing accurate forecasting for LV and MV networks: (1) customers within LV and MV networks are much less, implying greater volatility within those load profiles; (2) not all customers have smart metres. Particularly, the two challenges would exacerbate forecasting performance under unexpected events, such as extreme weather and COVID-19 outbreaks. To secure accurate short-term load forecasting for LV and MV networks, this paper customised a Spatio-Temporal Edge-Cloud-coordinated (STEC) approach on a loop training structure—LV networks to MV networks to LV networks. For each LV network, this approach utilises XGboost to learn the relationship between weather data, substation-side loads, and a few accessible customer-side load data to deliver rough forecasting. Then, it adopts the rough forecasting results and accessible data for all LV networks within an MV network to train the convolutional neural networks and gated recurrent unit (CNN-GRU) network. This step provides load forecasting for MV networks and simultaneously refines load forecasting for LV networks by generating the interacting relationship between LV substations of different locations. Case studies reveal that the STEC approach successfully extrapolates the demand-varying information from long-term datasets and improves short-term forecasting performance under both normal scenarios and newly occurring unexpected scenarios for LV and MV networks. The loop training structure halves the forecasting error, compared to classic methodology by utilising the local data only for MV networks.

Abstract Image

边缘数据中心促进的短期负荷预测:一种协调的边缘云方法
与国家层面的负荷预测相比,为低压和中压电网提供准确的负荷预测面临两个挑战:(1)低压和中压电网内的客户要少得多,这意味着这些负荷分布的波动性更大;(2)并非所有客户都有智能电表。特别是,这两项挑战将加剧极端天气和COVID-19疫情等突发事件下的预测效果。为了保证对低压和中压网络进行准确的短期负荷预测,本文针对回路训练结构(低压网络-中压网络-低压网络)定制了一种时空边缘云协调(STEC)方法。对于每个低压电网,该方法利用XGboost来学习天气数据、变电站侧负载和一些可访问的客户端负载数据之间的关系,从而提供粗略的预测。然后,利用一个中压网络中所有LV网络的粗略预测结果和可访问数据,对卷积神经网络和门控循环单元(CNN-GRU)网络进行训练。该步骤通过生成不同位置的低压变电站之间的交互关系,对中压网进行负荷预测,同时对低压网进行负荷预测的细化。案例研究表明,STEC方法成功地从长期数据集中推断出需求变化信息,并提高了低压和中压网络在正常情景和新出现的意外情景下的短期预测性能。与仅利用局部数据的经典方法相比,循环训练结构将预测误差减半。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IET Smart Grid
IET Smart Grid Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
41
审稿时长
29 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信