Diversity in old age: Stereotyping of subgroups of older people across cultures

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Christin-Melanie Vauclair, Carla Sofia Esteves, Friederike Eyssel, Charles Harb
{"title":"Diversity in old age: Stereotyping of subgroups of older people across cultures","authors":"Christin-Melanie Vauclair,&nbsp;Carla Sofia Esteves,&nbsp;Friederike Eyssel,&nbsp;Charles Harb","doi":"10.1111/ajsp.12651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>An ageing population is increasingly recognised as a critical concern in the social sciences, especially in regard to the issue of ageism. The literature suggests that older people are subject to ambivalent and paternalistic judgements. However, this does not consider diversity within the older population and that cultures may differ in how they perceive and evaluate diverse groups of older people. To address these gaps, a pre-study was conducted employing a freelisting task to identify old age subgroups. In the main study, participants from the United States and Germany (individualistic-loose cultures) and Japan, Lebanon and Portugal (collectivistic-tight cultures) were asked to evaluate 19 distinct subgroups of older people by using stereotype content measures. The results suggest that subgroups' clusters were generally perceived as low, medium, or high on both the competence and warmth dimensions providing no support for clearly ambivalent old age subgroup stereotypes. As expected, competence and warmth were consistently associated with the socio-structural variables perceived status and threat. Overall, the results point to similar patterns across cultures with different subgroups being evaluated in a similar fashion on stereotype content measures. This highlights the importance of promoting a more nuanced understanding of older people when addressing ageism in different cultures.</p>","PeriodicalId":47394,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"27 4","pages":"968-981"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajsp.12651","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An ageing population is increasingly recognised as a critical concern in the social sciences, especially in regard to the issue of ageism. The literature suggests that older people are subject to ambivalent and paternalistic judgements. However, this does not consider diversity within the older population and that cultures may differ in how they perceive and evaluate diverse groups of older people. To address these gaps, a pre-study was conducted employing a freelisting task to identify old age subgroups. In the main study, participants from the United States and Germany (individualistic-loose cultures) and Japan, Lebanon and Portugal (collectivistic-tight cultures) were asked to evaluate 19 distinct subgroups of older people by using stereotype content measures. The results suggest that subgroups' clusters were generally perceived as low, medium, or high on both the competence and warmth dimensions providing no support for clearly ambivalent old age subgroup stereotypes. As expected, competence and warmth were consistently associated with the socio-structural variables perceived status and threat. Overall, the results point to similar patterns across cultures with different subgroups being evaluated in a similar fashion on stereotype content measures. This highlights the importance of promoting a more nuanced understanding of older people when addressing ageism in different cultures.

老年多样性:不同文化对老年人亚群体的刻板印象
人们日益认识到,人口老龄化是社会科学的一个重大问题,特别是在歧视老年人的问题方面。文献表明,老年人容易受到矛盾和家长式判断的影响。然而,这并没有考虑到老年人口的多样性,也没有考虑到文化在如何看待和评价不同的老年人群体方面可能存在差异。为了解决这些差距,采用自由列表任务进行了一项预研究,以确定老年亚组。在主要研究中,来自美国和德国(个人主义-宽松文化)以及日本、黎巴嫩和葡萄牙(集体主义-严格文化)的参与者被要求通过刻板印象内容测量来评估19个不同的老年人亚组。结果表明,子群体的集群在能力和热情两个维度上通常被认为是低、中或高的,这并不支持明显矛盾的老年子群体刻板印象。正如预期的那样,能力和热情始终与感知地位和威胁的社会结构变量相关。总的来说,结果指出了跨文化的相似模式,不同的子群体在刻板印象内容测量上以相似的方式进行评估。这突出了在处理不同文化中的年龄歧视问题时促进对老年人更细致的理解的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of Social Psychology publishes empirical papers and major reviews on any topic in social psychology and personality, and on topics in other areas of basic and applied psychology that highlight the role of social psychological concepts and theories. The journal coverage also includes all aspects of social processes such as development, cognition, emotions, personality, health and well-being, in the sociocultural context of organisations, schools, communities, social networks, and virtual groups. The journal encourages interdisciplinary integration with social sciences, life sciences, engineering sciences, and the humanities. The journal positively encourages submissions with Asian content and/or Asian authors but welcomes high-quality submissions from any part of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信