Fairness in artificial intelligence-driven multi-organ image segmentation

iRadiology Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1002/ird3.101
Qing Li, Yizhe Zhang, Longyu Sun, Mengting Sun, Meng Liu, Zian Wang, Qi Wang, Shuo Wang, Chengyan Wang
{"title":"Fairness in artificial intelligence-driven multi-organ image segmentation","authors":"Qing Li,&nbsp;Yizhe Zhang,&nbsp;Longyu Sun,&nbsp;Mengting Sun,&nbsp;Meng Liu,&nbsp;Zian Wang,&nbsp;Qi Wang,&nbsp;Shuo Wang,&nbsp;Chengyan Wang","doi":"10.1002/ird3.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Fairness is an emerging consideration when assessing the segmentation performance of machine learning models across various demographic groups. During clinical decision-making, an unfair segmentation model exhibits risks in that it can pose inappropriate diagnoses and unsuitable treatment plans for underrepresented demographic groups, resulting in severe consequences for patients and society. In medical artificial intelligence (AI), the fairness of multi-organ segmentation is imperative to augment the integration of models into clinical practice. As the use of multi-organ segmentation in medical image analysis expands, it is crucial to systematically examine fairness to ensure equitable segmentation performance across diverse patient populations and ensure health equity. However, comprehensive studies assessing the problem of fairness in multi-organ segmentation remain lacking. This study aimed to provide an overview of the fairness problem in multi-organ segmentation. We first define fairness and discuss the factors that lead to fairness problems such as individual fairness, group fairness, counterfactual fairness, and max–min fairness in multi-organ segmentation, focusing mainly on datasets and models. We then present strategies to potentially improve fairness in multi-organ segmentation. Additionally, we highlight the challenges and limitations of existing approaches and discuss future directions for improving the fairness of AI models for clinically oriented multi-organ segmentation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73508,"journal":{"name":"iRadiology","volume":"2 6","pages":"539-556"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ird3.101","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iRadiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ird3.101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fairness is an emerging consideration when assessing the segmentation performance of machine learning models across various demographic groups. During clinical decision-making, an unfair segmentation model exhibits risks in that it can pose inappropriate diagnoses and unsuitable treatment plans for underrepresented demographic groups, resulting in severe consequences for patients and society. In medical artificial intelligence (AI), the fairness of multi-organ segmentation is imperative to augment the integration of models into clinical practice. As the use of multi-organ segmentation in medical image analysis expands, it is crucial to systematically examine fairness to ensure equitable segmentation performance across diverse patient populations and ensure health equity. However, comprehensive studies assessing the problem of fairness in multi-organ segmentation remain lacking. This study aimed to provide an overview of the fairness problem in multi-organ segmentation. We first define fairness and discuss the factors that lead to fairness problems such as individual fairness, group fairness, counterfactual fairness, and max–min fairness in multi-organ segmentation, focusing mainly on datasets and models. We then present strategies to potentially improve fairness in multi-organ segmentation. Additionally, we highlight the challenges and limitations of existing approaches and discuss future directions for improving the fairness of AI models for clinically oriented multi-organ segmentation.

Abstract Image

人工智能多器官图像分割中的公平性
在评估机器学习模型在不同人口群体中的分割性能时,公平性是一个新兴的考虑因素。在临床决策过程中,不公平的细分模型存在风险,可能会对代表性不足的人群做出不恰当的诊断和不合适的治疗方案,给患者和社会造成严重后果。在医疗人工智能(AI)中,多器官分割的公平性对于增强模型与临床实践的整合至关重要。随着多器官分割在医学图像分析中的应用的扩大,系统地检查公平性以确保在不同患者群体中公平的分割性能并确保健康公平至关重要。然而,评估多器官分割公平性问题的综合研究仍然缺乏。本研究旨在对多器官分割中的公平性问题进行综述。我们首先定义了公平性,并讨论了导致多器官分割中个体公平性、群体公平性、反事实公平性和最大最小公平性等公平性问题的因素,主要集中在数据集和模型上。然后,我们提出了可能提高多器官分割公平性的策略。此外,我们强调了现有方法的挑战和局限性,并讨论了提高临床面向多器官分割的人工智能模型公平性的未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信