Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of cerebrovascular diseases using magnetic resonance imaging: A scoping review

iRadiology Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1002/ird3.105
Yituo Wang, Zeru Zhang, Ying Peng, Silu Chen, Shuai Zhou, Jiqiang Liu, Song Gao, Guangming Zhu, Cong Han, Bing Wu
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of cerebrovascular diseases using magnetic resonance imaging: A scoping review","authors":"Yituo Wang,&nbsp;Zeru Zhang,&nbsp;Ying Peng,&nbsp;Silu Chen,&nbsp;Shuai Zhou,&nbsp;Jiqiang Liu,&nbsp;Song Gao,&nbsp;Guangming Zhu,&nbsp;Cong Han,&nbsp;Bing Wu","doi":"10.1002/ird3.105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The field of radiology is currently undergoing revolutionary changes owing to the increasing application of artificial intelligence (AI). This scoping review identifies and summarizes the technical methods and clinical applications of AI applied to magnetic resonance imaging of cerebrovascular diseases (CVDs). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews was adopted and articles listed in PubMed and Cochrane databases from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2023, were assessed. In total, 67 articles met the eligibility criteria. We obtained a general overview of the field, including lesion types, sample sizes, data sources, and databases and found that nearly half of the studies used multisequence magnetic resonance as the input. Both classical machine learning and deep learning were widely used. The evaluation metrics varied according to the five main algorithm tasks of classification, detection, segmentation, estimation, and generation. Cross-validation was primarily used with only one third of the included studies using external validation. We also illustrate the key questions of the CVD research studies and grade the clinical utility of their AI solutions. Although most attention is devoted to improving the performance of AI models, this scoping review provides information on the availability of algorithms, reliability of external validations, and consistency of evaluation metrics and may facilitate improved clinical applicability and acceptance.</p>","PeriodicalId":73508,"journal":{"name":"iRadiology","volume":"2 6","pages":"557-570"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ird3.105","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iRadiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ird3.105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The field of radiology is currently undergoing revolutionary changes owing to the increasing application of artificial intelligence (AI). This scoping review identifies and summarizes the technical methods and clinical applications of AI applied to magnetic resonance imaging of cerebrovascular diseases (CVDs). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews was adopted and articles listed in PubMed and Cochrane databases from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2023, were assessed. In total, 67 articles met the eligibility criteria. We obtained a general overview of the field, including lesion types, sample sizes, data sources, and databases and found that nearly half of the studies used multisequence magnetic resonance as the input. Both classical machine learning and deep learning were widely used. The evaluation metrics varied according to the five main algorithm tasks of classification, detection, segmentation, estimation, and generation. Cross-validation was primarily used with only one third of the included studies using external validation. We also illustrate the key questions of the CVD research studies and grade the clinical utility of their AI solutions. Although most attention is devoted to improving the performance of AI models, this scoping review provides information on the availability of algorithms, reliability of external validations, and consistency of evaluation metrics and may facilitate improved clinical applicability and acceptance.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信