An investigation into the applicability of rapid artificial intelligence-assisted compressed sensing in brain magnetic resonance imaging performed at 5 Tesla field strength

iRadiology Pub Date : 2024-12-08 DOI:10.1002/ird3.108
Liqiang Zhou, Jiaqi Wang
{"title":"An investigation into the applicability of rapid artificial intelligence-assisted compressed sensing in brain magnetic resonance imaging performed at 5 Tesla field strength","authors":"Liqiang Zhou,&nbsp;Jiaqi Wang","doi":"10.1002/ird3.108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 5 T offers unprecedented spatial resolution but is often limited by long scan times. Acceleration techniques, such as compressed sensing (CS) and artificial intelligence-assisted compressed sensing (ACS), have the potential to speed up the acquisition process while maintaining image quality. This study aims to evaluate and compare the performance of CS and ACS (with various acceleration factors) in brain MRI imaging at 5 T.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In this study, we enrolled 12 healthy volunteers and compared ACS-accelerated 5 T brain MRI with conventional methods of CS. The ACS acceleration factors for the brain protocol, consisting of 3D T1-weighted sequences and 2D T2-weighted sequences, were optimized in a pilot study on healthy volunteers (acceleration factor, 2.06–3.41× in T2-weighted imaging and 3.52–8.49× in T1-weighted imaging). We evaluated the images acquired from patients using various acceleration methods on the basis of acquisition times, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the contrast-to-noise ratio, subjective image quality, and diagnostic agreement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings revealed that ACS acceleration significantly reduced the acquisition times for T1- and T2-weighted sequences by up to 43% and 53%, respectively, compared with traditional CS at 5 T. Importantly, this acceleration was achieved while maintaining excellent image quality, demonstrated by higher or comparable SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio values.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The optimal ACS acceleration factors for 5 T brain MRI were determined to be 2.73× for 2D T2-weighted sequences and 6.5× for 3D T1-weighted sequences. ACS not only facilitates rapid imaging but also ensures comparable image quality and diagnostic performance, highlighting its potential to revolutionize high-field MRI scanning.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73508,"journal":{"name":"iRadiology","volume":"2 6","pages":"584-593"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ird3.108","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iRadiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ird3.108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 5 T offers unprecedented spatial resolution but is often limited by long scan times. Acceleration techniques, such as compressed sensing (CS) and artificial intelligence-assisted compressed sensing (ACS), have the potential to speed up the acquisition process while maintaining image quality. This study aims to evaluate and compare the performance of CS and ACS (with various acceleration factors) in brain MRI imaging at 5 T.

Methods

In this study, we enrolled 12 healthy volunteers and compared ACS-accelerated 5 T brain MRI with conventional methods of CS. The ACS acceleration factors for the brain protocol, consisting of 3D T1-weighted sequences and 2D T2-weighted sequences, were optimized in a pilot study on healthy volunteers (acceleration factor, 2.06–3.41× in T2-weighted imaging and 3.52–8.49× in T1-weighted imaging). We evaluated the images acquired from patients using various acceleration methods on the basis of acquisition times, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the contrast-to-noise ratio, subjective image quality, and diagnostic agreement.

Results

Our findings revealed that ACS acceleration significantly reduced the acquisition times for T1- and T2-weighted sequences by up to 43% and 53%, respectively, compared with traditional CS at 5 T. Importantly, this acceleration was achieved while maintaining excellent image quality, demonstrated by higher or comparable SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio values.

Conclusions

The optimal ACS acceleration factors for 5 T brain MRI were determined to be 2.73× for 2D T2-weighted sequences and 6.5× for 3D T1-weighted sequences. ACS not only facilitates rapid imaging but also ensures comparable image quality and diagnostic performance, highlighting its potential to revolutionize high-field MRI scanning.

Abstract Image

5特斯拉场强下快速人工智能辅助压缩感知在脑磁共振成像中的适用性研究
5 T的脑磁共振成像(MRI)提供了前所未有的空间分辨率,但往往受到长扫描时间的限制。加速技术,如压缩感知(CS)和人工智能辅助压缩感知(ACS),有可能在保持图像质量的同时加快采集过程。本研究旨在评价和比较CS和ACS(不同加速因子)在5 T脑MRI成像中的表现。方法在本研究中,我们招募了12名健康志愿者,将ACS加速5 T脑MRI与常规CS方法进行比较。在健康志愿者的前期研究中,优化了由3D t1加权序列和2D t2加权序列组成的脑协议ACS加速因子(加速因子为t2加权成像2.06 ~ 3.41×, t1加权成像3.52 ~ 8.49×)。我们根据采集次数、信噪比(SNR)、对比噪声比、主观图像质量和诊断一致性对使用各种加速方法从患者身上获取的图像进行评估。我们的研究结果表明,与传统的5 t CS相比,ACS加速显著减少了T1和t2加权序列的采集时间,分别减少了43%和53%。重要的是,这种加速是在保持优异图像质量的同时实现的,这可以通过更高或相当的信噪比和噪比值来证明。结论5t脑MRI最佳ACS加速因子2D t2加权序列为2.73×, 3D t1加权序列为6.5×。ACS不仅促进了快速成像,而且确保了相当的图像质量和诊断性能,突出了其革命性的高场MRI扫描的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信