The effect of land use intensity and habitat characteristics on butterfly community composition within the Southern Great Plains of the United States

Emily A. Geest, Raymond A. Moranz, Kristen A. Baum
{"title":"The effect of land use intensity and habitat characteristics on butterfly community composition within the Southern Great Plains of the United States","authors":"Emily A. Geest,&nbsp;Raymond A. Moranz,&nbsp;Kristen A. Baum","doi":"10.1002/glr2.12099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>As grasslands decline, grassland-dependent species such as grassland butterflies have experienced widespread population losses. To manage remaining grasslands, prescribed fire, grazing, and haying are common management practices across the Southern Great Plains of the United States. However, the impacts of management and land use intensity (LUI) on butterfly community composition and butterfly community traits are not well understood. Additionally, local habitat characteristics such as vegetation height and cover, as well as broader landscape categorization, including how much agriculture or urbanization is occurring around the habitat, can alter butterfly communities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted standardized butterfly and flowering forb surveys at grassland sites across north-central Oklahoma.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>LUI influenced overall butterfly community composition with sites managed only with fire having the most dissimilar butterfly community compared to three other management regimens. The amount of agriculture, urbanization, and wetlands surrounding study sites also influenced butterfly community composition. Flowering forb community measures differed by site with sites managed by fire alone having lower blooming forbs species richness, diversity, and abundance than sites with other management regimens.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Sites managed with only prescribed fire had the most disparate butterfly community in comparison to other management methods, suggesting that specialist butterfly species may be sensitive to increasing disturbance.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100593,"journal":{"name":"Grassland Research","volume":"3 4","pages":"306-317"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/glr2.12099","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grassland Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/glr2.12099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

As grasslands decline, grassland-dependent species such as grassland butterflies have experienced widespread population losses. To manage remaining grasslands, prescribed fire, grazing, and haying are common management practices across the Southern Great Plains of the United States. However, the impacts of management and land use intensity (LUI) on butterfly community composition and butterfly community traits are not well understood. Additionally, local habitat characteristics such as vegetation height and cover, as well as broader landscape categorization, including how much agriculture or urbanization is occurring around the habitat, can alter butterfly communities.

Methods

We conducted standardized butterfly and flowering forb surveys at grassland sites across north-central Oklahoma.

Results

LUI influenced overall butterfly community composition with sites managed only with fire having the most dissimilar butterfly community compared to three other management regimens. The amount of agriculture, urbanization, and wetlands surrounding study sites also influenced butterfly community composition. Flowering forb community measures differed by site with sites managed by fire alone having lower blooming forbs species richness, diversity, and abundance than sites with other management regimens.

Conclusions

Sites managed with only prescribed fire had the most disparate butterfly community in comparison to other management methods, suggesting that specialist butterfly species may be sensitive to increasing disturbance.

Abstract Image

美国南部大平原土地利用强度和生境特征对蝴蝶群落组成的影响
随着草地的减少,草地依赖性物种如草地蝴蝶的数量减少。为了管理剩余的草原,规定生火、放牧和放牧是美国南部大平原上常见的管理方法。然而,管理和土地利用强度(LUI)对蝴蝶群落组成和群落性状的影响尚不清楚。此外,当地的栖息地特征,如植被高度和覆盖,以及更广泛的景观分类,包括栖息地周围发生的农业或城市化程度,都可以改变蝴蝶群落。方法在俄克拉荷马州中北部的草地上进行了标准化的蝴蝶和开花牧草调查。结果LUI影响了蝴蝶群落的整体组成,与其他三种管理方案相比,仅火管理的地点蝴蝶群落差异最大。研究地点周围的农业、城市化和湿地数量也影响了蝴蝶群落的组成。开花牧草群落测量值因地而异,单火管理的样地开花牧草物种丰富度、多样性和丰度低于其他管理方式的样地。结论与其他管理方法相比,仅采用规定火灾管理的地点蝴蝶群落多样性最大,表明特殊蝴蝶种类可能对干扰的增加较为敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信