Utilization of Radical Prostatectomy Versus Radiation Therapy for Gleason Grade Group 5 Prostate Cancer Before and After USPSTF Grade D Recommendation Against Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening in 2012

IF 2.9 2区医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY

Cancer Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1002/cam4.70624

H. Scott McGinnis, Taylor Corriher, James Janopaul-Naylor, Subir Goyal, Yuan Liu, Zelin Wang, Sagar A. Patel

{"title":"Utilization of Radical Prostatectomy Versus Radiation Therapy for Gleason Grade Group 5 Prostate Cancer Before and After USPSTF Grade D Recommendation Against Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening in 2012","authors":"H. Scott McGinnis, Taylor Corriher, James Janopaul-Naylor, Subir Goyal, Yuan Liu, Zelin Wang, Sagar A. Patel","doi":"10.1002/cam4.70624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The 2012 United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) Grade D recommendation against prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening has resulted in a shift to higher-stage prostate cancer (PC) at diagnosis. We evaluate the utilization of radical prostatectomy (RP) versus radiation therapy (RT) in the US for Gleason grade group 5 (GG5) prostate cancer before and after 2012.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We identified 34,011 men with localized GG5 PC undergoing primary therapy with (1) RP or (2) RT + androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) between 2004 and 2017 from the National Cancer Database. The chi-square test was used to compare the relative use of RP and RT before versus after 2012. Annual use of RP versus RT from 2004 to 2017 was compared using Cochran-Armitage test for trend. We modeled the effect of treatment year on the use of RP using multivariable logistic regression.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Across all centers, the use of RP increased from 31% to 41% (<i>p</i> for trend < 0.001). 2012 was associated with significant inflection for increase in RP use in all centers. There was an increased odds of receiving RP after 2012 (adjusted OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.28–1.40, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Utilization of RP for GG5 PC has significantly increased in the United States over the past decade. It remains unknown if outcomes may be compromised in this group of high-risk men, many of whom require post-prostatectomy RT and/or ADT. Prospective comparison of RP versus RT + ADT for GG5 PC are needed to determine optimal treatment for these patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.70624","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.70624","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The 2012 United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) Grade D recommendation against prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening has resulted in a shift to higher-stage prostate cancer (PC) at diagnosis. We evaluate the utilization of radical prostatectomy (RP) versus radiation therapy (RT) in the US for Gleason grade group 5 (GG5) prostate cancer before and after 2012.

Methods

We identified 34,011 men with localized GG5 PC undergoing primary therapy with (1) RP or (2) RT + androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) between 2004 and 2017 from the National Cancer Database. The chi-square test was used to compare the relative use of RP and RT before versus after 2012. Annual use of RP versus RT from 2004 to 2017 was compared using Cochran-Armitage test for trend. We modeled the effect of treatment year on the use of RP using multivariable logistic regression.

Results

Across all centers, the use of RP increased from 31% to 41% (p for trend < 0.001). 2012 was associated with significant inflection for increase in RP use in all centers. There was an increased odds of receiving RP after 2012 (adjusted OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.28–1.40, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Utilization of RP for GG5 PC has significantly increased in the United States over the past decade. It remains unknown if outcomes may be compromised in this group of high-risk men, many of whom require post-prostatectomy RT and/or ADT. Prospective comparison of RP versus RT + ADT for GG5 PC are needed to determine optimal treatment for these patients.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Cancer Medicine ONCOLOGY-

CiteScore

5.50

自引率

2.50%

发文量

907

审稿时长

19 weeks

期刊介绍： Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas: Clinical Cancer Research Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations Cancer Biology: Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery. Cancer Prevention: Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach. Bioinformatics: Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers. Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.