Mexico under the universal human rights system: The case of the committee on the protection of the rights of all migrant workers and members of their families

IF 0.8 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Daniela González Iza
{"title":"Mexico under the universal human rights system: The case of the committee on the protection of the rights of all migrant workers and members of their families","authors":"Daniela González Iza","doi":"10.1111/lamp.12369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The relationship between Mexico and human rights treaty bodies has been paradigmatic due to the adoption of a foreign policy based on an openness to international scrutiny that is not reflected in the internal situation of human rights. An example of this contradiction is the case of the rights of migrants in Mexico. The objective of this article is to analyze the effects of mechanisms of the United Nations System of Human Rights, specifically the Committee on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families in Mexico, to determine the scope of the impact of civil society on the guarantee of human rights of migrants despite the lack of international consensus regarding the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families.</p><p>墨西哥与人权条约机构的关系一直是典型的,因为墨西哥采取了以接受国际审查为基础的外交政策,而国际审查并没有反映在国内人权状况中。这种矛盾的一个例子就是该国移民的权利。本文旨在分析联合国人权系统机制的影响,特别是墨西哥的“保护所有移民工人及其家庭成员权利”委员会的影响,以确定公民社会对“保障移民人权”的影响范围,尽管国际社会在保护所有移民工人及其家庭成员权利之国际公约方面缺乏共识。</p><p>La relación de México con los órganos de tratados de derechos humanos ha sido paradigmática debido a la adopción de una política exterior basada en una apertura al escrutinio internacional que no se refleja en la situación interna de los derechos humanos. Un ejemplo de esta contradicción es el caso de los derechos de los migrantes en el país. El objetivo de este artículo es analizar los efectos de los mecanismos del Sistema de las Naciones Unidas de Derechos Humanos, específicamente del Comité de Protección de los Derechos de Todos los Trabajadores Migratorios y de sus Familiares en México, para determinar el alcance de la incidencia de la sociedad civil en la garantía de los derechos humanos de los migrantes a pesar de la falta de consenso internacional en torno a la Convención Internacional sobre la Protección de los Derechos de Todos los Trabajadores Migratorios y de sus Familiares.</p>","PeriodicalId":42501,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Policy","volume":"15 4","pages":"666-680"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lamp.12369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relationship between Mexico and human rights treaty bodies has been paradigmatic due to the adoption of a foreign policy based on an openness to international scrutiny that is not reflected in the internal situation of human rights. An example of this contradiction is the case of the rights of migrants in Mexico. The objective of this article is to analyze the effects of mechanisms of the United Nations System of Human Rights, specifically the Committee on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families in Mexico, to determine the scope of the impact of civil society on the guarantee of human rights of migrants despite the lack of international consensus regarding the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families.

墨西哥与人权条约机构的关系一直是典型的,因为墨西哥采取了以接受国际审查为基础的外交政策,而国际审查并没有反映在国内人权状况中。这种矛盾的一个例子就是该国移民的权利。本文旨在分析联合国人权系统机制的影响,特别是墨西哥的“保护所有移民工人及其家庭成员权利”委员会的影响,以确定公民社会对“保障移民人权”的影响范围,尽管国际社会在保护所有移民工人及其家庭成员权利之国际公约方面缺乏共识。

La relación de México con los órganos de tratados de derechos humanos ha sido paradigmática debido a la adopción de una política exterior basada en una apertura al escrutinio internacional que no se refleja en la situación interna de los derechos humanos. Un ejemplo de esta contradicción es el caso de los derechos de los migrantes en el país. El objetivo de este artículo es analizar los efectos de los mecanismos del Sistema de las Naciones Unidas de Derechos Humanos, específicamente del Comité de Protección de los Derechos de Todos los Trabajadores Migratorios y de sus Familiares en México, para determinar el alcance de la incidencia de la sociedad civil en la garantía de los derechos humanos de los migrantes a pesar de la falta de consenso internacional en torno a la Convención Internacional sobre la Protección de los Derechos de Todos los Trabajadores Migratorios y de sus Familiares.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Latin American Policy
Latin American Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Latin American Policy (LAP): A Journal of Politics and Governance in a Changing Region, a collaboration of the Policy Studies Organization and the Escuela de Gobierno y Transformación Pública, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Santa Fe Campus, published its first issue in mid-2010. LAP’s primary focus is intended to be in the policy arena, and will focus on any issue or field involving authority and polities (although not necessarily clustered on governments), agency (either governmental or from the civil society, or both), and the pursuit/achievement of specific (or anticipated) outcomes. We invite authors to focus on any crosscutting issue situated in the interface between the policy and political domain concerning or affecting any Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) country or group of countries. This journal will remain open to multidisciplinary approaches dealing with policy issues and the political contexts in which they take place.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信