Environmental biocontamination by SARS-CoV-2 Virus in the hospital setting

IF 4.8 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
M Espejo Mambié , D San Jose-Saras , C Bischofberger Valdés , C Díaz-Agero Pérez , JC Galán Montemayor , L Martínez-García , M Abreu Di-Berardino , P Moreno-Nunez , J Vicente-Guijarro , J.M Aranaz-Andrés
{"title":"Environmental biocontamination by SARS-CoV-2 Virus in the hospital setting","authors":"M Espejo Mambié ,&nbsp;D San Jose-Saras ,&nbsp;C Bischofberger Valdés ,&nbsp;C Díaz-Agero Pérez ,&nbsp;JC Galán Montemayor ,&nbsp;L Martínez-García ,&nbsp;M Abreu Di-Berardino ,&nbsp;P Moreno-Nunez ,&nbsp;J Vicente-Guijarro ,&nbsp;J.M Aranaz-Andrés","doi":"10.1016/j.crmicr.2025.100355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Demonstrating the capability to isolate biological material from the environment was fundamental to supporting any transmission route. Various and inconsistent methodologies have been used to address this issue; however, the debate in scientific societies about the possibility of airborne transmission as a source of SARS-CoV-2 spread remained open.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To analyze SARS-CoV-2 contamination in the air and on surfaces in a hospital setting during the COVID-19 pandemic.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study involved air and surface sampling in the emergency, hospitalization, and intensive care unit areas of the Ramón y Cajal University Hospital. A consistent methodology was used for all samples, and clinical and environmental parameters and characterization of each location were recorded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 234 samples were collected, comprising 160 surface samples and 74 air samples, of which 6.84 % tested positive (13/160 surface samples and 3/74 air samples). High-contact surfaces had the highest proportion of positive samples (12/13). All positive air samples were identified within 2 m of patients who had recently developed symptoms (&lt;5 days). High dependency and elevated temperatures seemed to indicate a higher risk of environmental biocontamination. Additionally, there was a higher risk of contamination in the intensive care units than in the hospitalization or emergency units.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34305,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Microbial Sciences","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100355"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Microbial Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666517425000173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Demonstrating the capability to isolate biological material from the environment was fundamental to supporting any transmission route. Various and inconsistent methodologies have been used to address this issue; however, the debate in scientific societies about the possibility of airborne transmission as a source of SARS-CoV-2 spread remained open.

Objective

To analyze SARS-CoV-2 contamination in the air and on surfaces in a hospital setting during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

This study involved air and surface sampling in the emergency, hospitalization, and intensive care unit areas of the Ramón y Cajal University Hospital. A consistent methodology was used for all samples, and clinical and environmental parameters and characterization of each location were recorded.

Results

A total of 234 samples were collected, comprising 160 surface samples and 74 air samples, of which 6.84 % tested positive (13/160 surface samples and 3/74 air samples). High-contact surfaces had the highest proportion of positive samples (12/13). All positive air samples were identified within 2 m of patients who had recently developed symptoms (<5 days). High dependency and elevated temperatures seemed to indicate a higher risk of environmental biocontamination. Additionally, there was a higher risk of contamination in the intensive care units than in the hospitalization or emergency units.

Abstract Image

SARS-CoV-2病毒对医院环境的生物污染
证明从环境中分离生物材料的能力是支持任何传播途径的基础。已经使用了各种不一致的方法来解决这个问题;然而,科学界关于空气传播作为SARS-CoV-2传播来源的可能性的争论仍然存在。目的分析2019冠状病毒病大流行期间医院空气和表面的SARS-CoV-2污染情况。方法本研究采用Ramón y Cajal大学医院急诊、住院和重症监护病房区域的空气和地面采样。对所有样本采用一致的方法,记录临床和环境参数以及每个位置的特征。结果共采集标本234份,其中地表标本160份,空气标本74份,阳性率6.84%(地表标本13/160,空气标本3/74)。高接触面阳性样品比例最高(12/13)。所有阳性空气样本均在最近出现症状(5天)的患者2米范围内确定。高度依赖和高温似乎表明环境生物污染的风险更高。此外,重症监护病房的污染风险高于住院或急诊病房。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Research in Microbial Sciences
Current Research in Microbial Sciences Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology and Microbiology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信