Tailoring bus rapid transit to the complex realities of African Cities: Critical issues and public policy planning approaches

IF 3.9 Q2 TRANSPORTATION
Emmanuel Theodore Asimeng, Franco Jauregui-Fung
{"title":"Tailoring bus rapid transit to the complex realities of African Cities: Critical issues and public policy planning approaches","authors":"Emmanuel Theodore Asimeng,&nbsp;Franco Jauregui-Fung","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2025.101351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Paratransit services in African cities, characterised by reckless driving, unscheduled operations, ageing and small vehicles, tax avoidance, lack of social protection, and irregular worker earnings, account for a significant share of daily trips. To address these challenges, some cities have turned to bus rapid transit (BRT) systems as a more affordable and efficient public transit solution. While 191 cities globally have implemented BRT, only six are in Africa. These African BRT implementations have often been fraught with difficulties, including delays, cost overruns, and operational challenges, while several projects have failed to materialise despite significant public investment. This raises a critical question: why is BRT adoption limited in African cities, despite rapid urbanisation and the inadequacies of paratransit systems? In response to this question, this paper examines three public policy planning concepts commonly applied to BRT projects: rationalist, disjointed incremental, and step-by-step, evaluating their effectiveness and limitations in the African context. Based on this analysis, we propose an approach that aligns more closely with African cities’ unique socioeconomic and transport dynamics. Additionally, we provide strategies for addressing key implementation challenges, such as integrating BRT with existing transport systems, managing stakeholder resistance, and ensuring financial and institutional sustainability. Grounded in a comprehensive review of three BRT case studies and public policy frameworks, this paper offers actionable recommendations to strengthen BRT as a viable solution to urban transport challenges in African cities. We recommend adopting a step-by-step approach that emphasises institutional and legislative restructuring, management of competing transit modes, stepwise implementation of BRT components, and innovative infrastructure funding strategies to ensure the new service’s successful implementation, operation and sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 101351"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198225000302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Paratransit services in African cities, characterised by reckless driving, unscheduled operations, ageing and small vehicles, tax avoidance, lack of social protection, and irregular worker earnings, account for a significant share of daily trips. To address these challenges, some cities have turned to bus rapid transit (BRT) systems as a more affordable and efficient public transit solution. While 191 cities globally have implemented BRT, only six are in Africa. These African BRT implementations have often been fraught with difficulties, including delays, cost overruns, and operational challenges, while several projects have failed to materialise despite significant public investment. This raises a critical question: why is BRT adoption limited in African cities, despite rapid urbanisation and the inadequacies of paratransit systems? In response to this question, this paper examines three public policy planning concepts commonly applied to BRT projects: rationalist, disjointed incremental, and step-by-step, evaluating their effectiveness and limitations in the African context. Based on this analysis, we propose an approach that aligns more closely with African cities’ unique socioeconomic and transport dynamics. Additionally, we provide strategies for addressing key implementation challenges, such as integrating BRT with existing transport systems, managing stakeholder resistance, and ensuring financial and institutional sustainability. Grounded in a comprehensive review of three BRT case studies and public policy frameworks, this paper offers actionable recommendations to strengthen BRT as a viable solution to urban transport challenges in African cities. We recommend adopting a step-by-step approach that emphasises institutional and legislative restructuring, management of competing transit modes, stepwise implementation of BRT components, and innovative infrastructure funding strategies to ensure the new service’s successful implementation, operation and sustainability.
使快速公交系统适应非洲城市的复杂现实:关键问题和公共政策规划方法
非洲城市的辅助交通服务,其特点是鲁莽驾驶、计划外运营、车辆老化和小型化、避税、缺乏社会保障以及工人收入不稳定,占日常出行的很大一部分。为了应对这些挑战,一些城市已经转向快速公交系统(BRT),作为一种更经济、更高效的公共交通解决方案。虽然全球有191个城市实施了快速公交系统,但非洲只有6个。这些非洲快速公交系统的实施往往充满了困难,包括延误、成本超支和运营挑战,尽管有大量的公共投资,但仍有几个项目未能实现。这就提出了一个关键问题:为什么快速公交系统在非洲城市的采用受到限制,尽管城市化速度很快,而且辅助交通系统也不完善?针对这一问题,本文考察了三种通常应用于BRT项目的公共政策规划概念:理性主义、脱节的增量和逐步,并评估了它们在非洲背景下的有效性和局限性。基于这一分析,我们提出了一种更贴近非洲城市独特的社会经济和交通动态的方法。此外,我们还提供了应对关键实施挑战的策略,例如将BRT与现有交通系统整合,管理利益相关者的抵制,以及确保财务和制度的可持续性。基于对三个快速公交案例研究和公共政策框架的全面审查,本文提出了可操作的建议,以加强快速公交作为应对非洲城市城市交通挑战的可行解决方案。我们建议采取循序渐进的方法,强调机构和立法的重组、竞争性交通方式的管理、BRT组件的逐步实施以及创新的基础设施融资战略,以确保新服务的成功实施、运营和可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信