Effectiveness of active learning techniques in knowledge retention among engineering students

IF 3.5 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
R. Maceiras, J. Feijoo, V. Alfonsin, L. Perez-Rial
{"title":"Effectiveness of active learning techniques in knowledge retention among engineering students","authors":"R. Maceiras,&nbsp;J. Feijoo,&nbsp;V. Alfonsin,&nbsp;L. Perez-Rial","doi":"10.1016/j.ece.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many studies have examined the effectiveness of active learning techniques in comparison with the traditional method and compared the student performance between the two types of teaching. However, there are few studies focused on long-term retention after using different active learning techniques. This study evaluates the effectiveness of two active learning techniques—the Jigsaw cooperative learning approach and H5P interactive videos—compared with traditional lectures in enhancing immediate learning outcomes and long-term retention among engineering students. To evaluate the effectiveness of these techniques on student retention, a total of nine academic years (from 2014 to 2023 were evaluated, involved approximately 150 students per year. An exhaustive analysis of results was conducted in comparison with traditional method, before and after applying these learning activities, with the aim of testing its effectiveness. In addition, a survey was distributed among students to assess their experience and perception about the used techniques. The survey showed high satisfaction rates, particularly for interactive videos, highlighting the perceived benefits of these methods in engaging students and supporting skill development. The results demonstrate that the Jigsaw and H5P interactive video methods showed promise in terms of immediate learning outcomes, particularly in student engagement and performance in short-term assessments. However, in terms of long-term knowledge retention, the control group performed better, indicating that traditional lectures might have a stronger effect on retaining knowledge over time. The active learning techniques, while effective in the short-term, did not significantly enhance academic performance in the long-term assessments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48509,"journal":{"name":"Education for Chemical Engineers","volume":"51 ","pages":"Pages 1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Chemical Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S174977282500003X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many studies have examined the effectiveness of active learning techniques in comparison with the traditional method and compared the student performance between the two types of teaching. However, there are few studies focused on long-term retention after using different active learning techniques. This study evaluates the effectiveness of two active learning techniques—the Jigsaw cooperative learning approach and H5P interactive videos—compared with traditional lectures in enhancing immediate learning outcomes and long-term retention among engineering students. To evaluate the effectiveness of these techniques on student retention, a total of nine academic years (from 2014 to 2023 were evaluated, involved approximately 150 students per year. An exhaustive analysis of results was conducted in comparison with traditional method, before and after applying these learning activities, with the aim of testing its effectiveness. In addition, a survey was distributed among students to assess their experience and perception about the used techniques. The survey showed high satisfaction rates, particularly for interactive videos, highlighting the perceived benefits of these methods in engaging students and supporting skill development. The results demonstrate that the Jigsaw and H5P interactive video methods showed promise in terms of immediate learning outcomes, particularly in student engagement and performance in short-term assessments. However, in terms of long-term knowledge retention, the control group performed better, indicating that traditional lectures might have a stronger effect on retaining knowledge over time. The active learning techniques, while effective in the short-term, did not significantly enhance academic performance in the long-term assessments.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
30
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Education for Chemical Engineers was launched in 2006 with a remit to publisheducation research papers, resource reviews and teaching and learning notes. ECE is targeted at chemical engineering academics and educators, discussing the ongoingchanges and development in chemical engineering education. This international title publishes papers from around the world, creating a global network of chemical engineering academics. Papers demonstrating how educational research results can be applied to chemical engineering education are particularly welcome, as are the accounts of research work that brings new perspectives to established principles, highlighting unsolved problems or indicating direction for future research relevant to chemical engineering education. Core topic areas: -Assessment- Accreditation- Curriculum development and transformation- Design- Diversity- Distance education-- E-learning Entrepreneurship programs- Industry-academic linkages- Benchmarking- Lifelong learning- Multidisciplinary programs- Outreach from kindergarten to high school programs- Student recruitment and retention and transition programs- New technology- Problem-based learning- Social responsibility and professionalism- Teamwork- Web-based learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信