Comparison between single and multiple daily distributions of the diet on growth performance, behaviour, and rumen health of fattening Limousin bulls

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Luisa Magrin, Lorenzo Serva, Paola Prevedello, Giorgia Fabbri, Oliver Martinić, Giulio Cozzi, Flaviana Gottardo
{"title":"Comparison between single and multiple daily distributions of the diet on growth performance, behaviour, and rumen health of fattening Limousin bulls","authors":"Luisa Magrin,&nbsp;Lorenzo Serva,&nbsp;Paola Prevedello,&nbsp;Giorgia Fabbri,&nbsp;Oliver Martinić,&nbsp;Giulio Cozzi,&nbsp;Flaviana Gottardo","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study compared the effects of single <em>vs</em>. multiple daily distributions of the fattening diet on Limousin bulls' growth performance, behaviour, and rumen health. The experimental period spanned 27 months, during which 37 batches of Limousin bulls progressively entered the study to complete their fattening. Each batch was split into two balanced groups of animals that were then transferred to two identical fattening barns. Bulls in one barn were conventionally fed a total mixed ration (TMR) with a single daily distribution (CFS). An automatic feeding system (AFS), operating in the second barn, self-prepared a similar TMR delivered more times a day according to bulls’ voluntary intake. A total of 701 bulls were fattened with CFS, and 739 bulls with AFS, for an average number of 129 <em>vs</em>. 130 days (P = 0.81), respectively. The average number of TMR daily discharges by AFS was 4.2 ± 1.6. Behavioural observations confirmed that bulls adapted their feeding and resting activities in response to the time of TMR administration. The fresh-made ration provided at each delivery by AFS increased bulls' dry matter intake compared to CFS bulls (8.50 <em>vs</em>. 7.95 kg/d; P = 0.001). Bulls of both feeding systems had a similar daily gain (1.55 <em>vs</em>. 1.58 kg; P = 0.23) and carcass weight. However, from an animal health and welfare perspective, the fewer medical treatments and the lower incidence of rumen mucosa disorders observed with AFS compared to CFS should encourage the introduction of automated solutions to increase the frequency of daily feed distributions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"320 ","pages":"Article 116227"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125000227","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study compared the effects of single vs. multiple daily distributions of the fattening diet on Limousin bulls' growth performance, behaviour, and rumen health. The experimental period spanned 27 months, during which 37 batches of Limousin bulls progressively entered the study to complete their fattening. Each batch was split into two balanced groups of animals that were then transferred to two identical fattening barns. Bulls in one barn were conventionally fed a total mixed ration (TMR) with a single daily distribution (CFS). An automatic feeding system (AFS), operating in the second barn, self-prepared a similar TMR delivered more times a day according to bulls’ voluntary intake. A total of 701 bulls were fattened with CFS, and 739 bulls with AFS, for an average number of 129 vs. 130 days (P = 0.81), respectively. The average number of TMR daily discharges by AFS was 4.2 ± 1.6. Behavioural observations confirmed that bulls adapted their feeding and resting activities in response to the time of TMR administration. The fresh-made ration provided at each delivery by AFS increased bulls' dry matter intake compared to CFS bulls (8.50 vs. 7.95 kg/d; P = 0.001). Bulls of both feeding systems had a similar daily gain (1.55 vs. 1.58 kg; P = 0.23) and carcass weight. However, from an animal health and welfare perspective, the fewer medical treatments and the lower incidence of rumen mucosa disorders observed with AFS compared to CFS should encourage the introduction of automated solutions to increase the frequency of daily feed distributions.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Feed Science and Technology
Animal Feed Science and Technology 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding. Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome. The journal covers the following areas: Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement) Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins) Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信