Bruno Bracco Donatelli Muro , Rafaella Fernandes Carnevale , Felipe Norberto Alves Ferreira , Clarice Speridião Silva Neta , Francisco Alves Pereira , Rafaela Scalise Xavier de Freitas , Danny Alexsander Rojas Moreno , Diego Feitosa Leal , Matheus Saliba Monteiro , Ives Cláudio da Silva Bueno , Caio Abércio da Silva , Cesar Augusto Pospissil Garbossa
{"title":"Physicochemical properties, short chain fatty acids production and in vitro fermentation of fibrous ingredients using cecal inoculum from sows","authors":"Bruno Bracco Donatelli Muro , Rafaella Fernandes Carnevale , Felipe Norberto Alves Ferreira , Clarice Speridião Silva Neta , Francisco Alves Pereira , Rafaela Scalise Xavier de Freitas , Danny Alexsander Rojas Moreno , Diego Feitosa Leal , Matheus Saliba Monteiro , Ives Cláudio da Silva Bueno , Caio Abércio da Silva , Cesar Augusto Pospissil Garbossa","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluated and compared the physicochemical properties, <em>in vitro</em> fermentability, and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production of 13 fibrous ingredients using sow cecal inoculum. The ingredients analyzed included two commercial lignocelluloses (Arbocel® and OptiCell®), wheat bran, oat bran, beet pulp, soybean hull, citrus pulp, citrus pulp with benzoic acid (Citroflake®), dry distillers’ grains (DDG), guar gum, apple pulp, an extruded mix of tropical grasses (SmartFiber®), and a vegetable pulp mix. Bromatological composition and physicochemical properties (water-holding capacity (WHC), viscosity, and bulking) were determined alongside <em>in vitro</em> dry matter degradability (ivDMdeg) and fermentation parameters. Guar gum exhibited the highest hydration-related properties (WHC: 31.78 g/g; viscosity: 6.92 cP; bulking: 997.37 mL/g, P < 0.05), while DDG showed the lowest WHC and bulking (2.22 g/g and 1.76 mL/g, respectively; P < 0.05). Maximum gas production and fermentation rate were highest in guar gum and lowest in lignocelluloses and oat bran (P < 0.05). Oat bran also had the longest fermentation lag time (17.27) followed by guar gum, beet pulp and soybean hull, while citrus pulp and Citroflake® had the shortest (P < 0.05). Total SCFA production was highest in guar gum (114.1 mM), followed by beet pulp, citrus pulp, Citroflake®, apple pulp, vegetable pulp, wheat bran, and soybean hull, while lignocelluloses produced the least (P < 0.05). In conclusion, guar gum, beet pulp, citrus pulp, and soybean hull demonstrated the highest potential to influence the biochemical pathways of sows by producing significant amounts of short-chain fatty acids. Additionally, their high water-holding capacity, viscosity, and bulking properties suggest these ingredients might also enhance satiety, supporting metabolic health and welfare in sows.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"320 ","pages":"Article 116220"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037784012500015X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study evaluated and compared the physicochemical properties, in vitro fermentability, and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production of 13 fibrous ingredients using sow cecal inoculum. The ingredients analyzed included two commercial lignocelluloses (Arbocel® and OptiCell®), wheat bran, oat bran, beet pulp, soybean hull, citrus pulp, citrus pulp with benzoic acid (Citroflake®), dry distillers’ grains (DDG), guar gum, apple pulp, an extruded mix of tropical grasses (SmartFiber®), and a vegetable pulp mix. Bromatological composition and physicochemical properties (water-holding capacity (WHC), viscosity, and bulking) were determined alongside in vitro dry matter degradability (ivDMdeg) and fermentation parameters. Guar gum exhibited the highest hydration-related properties (WHC: 31.78 g/g; viscosity: 6.92 cP; bulking: 997.37 mL/g, P < 0.05), while DDG showed the lowest WHC and bulking (2.22 g/g and 1.76 mL/g, respectively; P < 0.05). Maximum gas production and fermentation rate were highest in guar gum and lowest in lignocelluloses and oat bran (P < 0.05). Oat bran also had the longest fermentation lag time (17.27) followed by guar gum, beet pulp and soybean hull, while citrus pulp and Citroflake® had the shortest (P < 0.05). Total SCFA production was highest in guar gum (114.1 mM), followed by beet pulp, citrus pulp, Citroflake®, apple pulp, vegetable pulp, wheat bran, and soybean hull, while lignocelluloses produced the least (P < 0.05). In conclusion, guar gum, beet pulp, citrus pulp, and soybean hull demonstrated the highest potential to influence the biochemical pathways of sows by producing significant amounts of short-chain fatty acids. Additionally, their high water-holding capacity, viscosity, and bulking properties suggest these ingredients might also enhance satiety, supporting metabolic health and welfare in sows.
期刊介绍:
Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding.
Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome.
The journal covers the following areas:
Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement)
Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value
Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds
Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such
Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins)
Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions
Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation
Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.