Pregnant women's experiences of and attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination: A qualitative descriptive study

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Hee Sun Kang , So Youn Kim , Jennie C. De Gagne , Sun-Mi Chae
{"title":"Pregnant women's experiences of and attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination: A qualitative descriptive study","authors":"Hee Sun Kang ,&nbsp;So Youn Kim ,&nbsp;Jennie C. De Gagne ,&nbsp;Sun-Mi Chae","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.126835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study aimed to understand the experiences of and attitudes toward pregnant women regarding COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>A qualitative descriptive study was conducted between April and June 2022 with 25 pregnant women in South Korea through seven focus group interviews via Zoom™. Data were analyzed using a content analysis approach.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants ranged in age from 27 to 41 years, with an average of 33.40 (±3.84) years. Gestational ages ranging from 15 to 35 weeks, with 13 women (52.0 %) in their second trimester, and 12 women (48.0 %) in their third trimester. All participants were college graduates. Forty percent completed three doses, while 40 % received two, 12 % one, and 8 % none. Three key themes emerged: (a) COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, (b) COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, and (c) needs for quality maternal care. Participants who accepted vaccination trusted the vaccines and viewed healthcare providers' recommendations and government policies, such as the “vaccine pass,” positively. Hesitant participants cited safety concerns, past medical history, and incomplete vaccination as reasons for reluctance. Additionally, there was a need for enhanced information on the vaccine and supportive, individualized maternal care.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings highlight the importance of tailored educational interventions and supportive care that leverages trust in healthcare providers to promote COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant women. There is a need to address information gaps and hesitancy among pregnant women related to their concerns regarding safety or past medical history. Future research should focus on strategies to ensure comprehensive care and information dissemination in this population in order to increase vaccination rates during pandemics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 126835"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X2500132X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This study aimed to understand the experiences of and attitudes toward pregnant women regarding COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy.

Material and methods

A qualitative descriptive study was conducted between April and June 2022 with 25 pregnant women in South Korea through seven focus group interviews via Zoom™. Data were analyzed using a content analysis approach.

Results

Participants ranged in age from 27 to 41 years, with an average of 33.40 (±3.84) years. Gestational ages ranging from 15 to 35 weeks, with 13 women (52.0 %) in their second trimester, and 12 women (48.0 %) in their third trimester. All participants were college graduates. Forty percent completed three doses, while 40 % received two, 12 % one, and 8 % none. Three key themes emerged: (a) COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, (b) COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, and (c) needs for quality maternal care. Participants who accepted vaccination trusted the vaccines and viewed healthcare providers' recommendations and government policies, such as the “vaccine pass,” positively. Hesitant participants cited safety concerns, past medical history, and incomplete vaccination as reasons for reluctance. Additionally, there was a need for enhanced information on the vaccine and supportive, individualized maternal care.

Conclusions

The findings highlight the importance of tailored educational interventions and supportive care that leverages trust in healthcare providers to promote COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant women. There is a need to address information gaps and hesitancy among pregnant women related to their concerns regarding safety or past medical history. Future research should focus on strategies to ensure comprehensive care and information dissemination in this population in order to increase vaccination rates during pandemics.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信