Relationship between preconception protein intake and gestational diabetes mellitus: The Japan Environment and Children's Study

IF 4.3 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Takahiro Omoto , Hyo Kyozuka , Tsuyoshi Murata , Toma Fukuda , Hirotaka Isogami , Chihiro Okoshi , Shun Yasuda , Akiko Yamaguchi , Akiko Sato , Yuka Ogata , Yuichi Nagasaka , Mitsuaki Hosoya , Seiji Yasumura , Koichi Hashimoto , Hidekazu Nishigori , Keiya Fujimori , the Japan Environment and Children's Study Group
{"title":"Relationship between preconception protein intake and gestational diabetes mellitus: The Japan Environment and Children's Study","authors":"Takahiro Omoto ,&nbsp;Hyo Kyozuka ,&nbsp;Tsuyoshi Murata ,&nbsp;Toma Fukuda ,&nbsp;Hirotaka Isogami ,&nbsp;Chihiro Okoshi ,&nbsp;Shun Yasuda ,&nbsp;Akiko Yamaguchi ,&nbsp;Akiko Sato ,&nbsp;Yuka Ogata ,&nbsp;Yuichi Nagasaka ,&nbsp;Mitsuaki Hosoya ,&nbsp;Seiji Yasumura ,&nbsp;Koichi Hashimoto ,&nbsp;Hidekazu Nishigori ,&nbsp;Keiya Fujimori ,&nbsp;the Japan Environment and Children's Study Group","doi":"10.1016/j.dsx.2025.103200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>To investigate the relationship between preconception protein intake and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed data from the Japan Environment and Children's Study, focusing on 80,346 participants (mean age 31.3 ± 4.9 years; mean body mass index 21.2 ± 3.2 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) who delivered between 2011 and 2014. These participants had no history of diabetes mellitus, no previous diagnosis of GDM, and did not use steroids during pregnancy. Participants were categorized into five groups based on preconception protein energy ratio quintiles (Q1 and Q5 represent the lowest and highest intake, respectively). Continuous variables were compared using one-way analysis of variance or the Kruskal–Wallis test, and categorical variables using chi-square tests. Primary outcomes were GDM, early-diagnosed GDM (Ed-GDM, diagnosed at &lt;24 weeks), and late-diagnosed GDM (Ld-GDM, diagnosed at &gt;24 weeks). Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using logistic regression analysis with the middle quintile (Q3) as the reference.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that using the Q3 group as the reference, the Q5 group had a higher risk of Ed-GDM (aOR 1.48, 95 % CI 1.06–2.07), whereas the Q1 group had a lower risk of Ed-GDM (aOR 0.69, 95 % CI 0.48–0.996). However, no significant differences were observed in the risk of GDM and Ld-GDM.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Higher preconception protein intake was associated with increased Ed-GDM risk. Further research is needed to refine dietary recommendations for preconception protein intake.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48252,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews","volume":"19 2","pages":"Article 103200"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome-Clinical Research & Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871402125000177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

To investigate the relationship between preconception protein intake and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

Methods

We analyzed data from the Japan Environment and Children's Study, focusing on 80,346 participants (mean age 31.3 ± 4.9 years; mean body mass index 21.2 ± 3.2 kg/m2) who delivered between 2011 and 2014. These participants had no history of diabetes mellitus, no previous diagnosis of GDM, and did not use steroids during pregnancy. Participants were categorized into five groups based on preconception protein energy ratio quintiles (Q1 and Q5 represent the lowest and highest intake, respectively). Continuous variables were compared using one-way analysis of variance or the Kruskal–Wallis test, and categorical variables using chi-square tests. Primary outcomes were GDM, early-diagnosed GDM (Ed-GDM, diagnosed at <24 weeks), and late-diagnosed GDM (Ld-GDM, diagnosed at >24 weeks). Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using logistic regression analysis with the middle quintile (Q3) as the reference.

Results

Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that using the Q3 group as the reference, the Q5 group had a higher risk of Ed-GDM (aOR 1.48, 95 % CI 1.06–2.07), whereas the Q1 group had a lower risk of Ed-GDM (aOR 0.69, 95 % CI 0.48–0.996). However, no significant differences were observed in the risk of GDM and Ld-GDM.

Conclusions

Higher preconception protein intake was associated with increased Ed-GDM risk. Further research is needed to refine dietary recommendations for preconception protein intake.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
2.00%
发文量
248
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews is the official journal of DiabetesIndia. It aims to provide a global platform for healthcare professionals, diabetes educators, and other stakeholders to submit their research on diabetes care. Types of Publications: Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research and Reviews publishes peer-reviewed original articles, reviews, short communications, case reports, letters to the Editor, and expert comments. Reviews and mini-reviews are particularly welcomed for areas within endocrinology undergoing rapid changes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信