Learning transactions representations for information management in banks: Mastering local, global, and external knowledge

Alexandra Bazarova , Maria Kovaleva , Ilya Kuleshov , Evgenia Romanenkova , Alexander Stepikin , Aleksandr Yugay , Dzhambulat Mollaev , Ivan Kireev , Andrey Savchenko , Alexey Zaytsev
{"title":"Learning transactions representations for information management in banks: Mastering local, global, and external knowledge","authors":"Alexandra Bazarova ,&nbsp;Maria Kovaleva ,&nbsp;Ilya Kuleshov ,&nbsp;Evgenia Romanenkova ,&nbsp;Alexander Stepikin ,&nbsp;Aleksandr Yugay ,&nbsp;Dzhambulat Mollaev ,&nbsp;Ivan Kireev ,&nbsp;Andrey Savchenko ,&nbsp;Alexey Zaytsev","doi":"10.1016/j.jjimei.2025.100323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In today’s world, banks use artificial intelligence to optimize diverse business processes, aiming to improve customer experience. Most of the customer-related tasks can be categorized into two groups: (1) local ones, which focus on a client’s current state, such as transaction forecasting, and (2) global ones, which consider the general customer behaviour, e.g., predicting successful loan repayment. Unfortunately, maintaining separate models for each task is costly. Therefore, to better facilitate information management, we compared eight state-of-the-art unsupervised methods on 11 tasks in search for a one-size-fits-all solution. Contrastive self-supervised learning methods were demonstrated to excel at global problems, while generative techniques were superior at local tasks. We also introduced a novel approach, which enriches the client’s representation by incorporating external information gathered from other clients. Our method outperforms classical models, boosting accuracy by up to 20%.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100699,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information Management Data Insights","volume":"5 1","pages":"Article 100323"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information Management Data Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667096825000059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In today’s world, banks use artificial intelligence to optimize diverse business processes, aiming to improve customer experience. Most of the customer-related tasks can be categorized into two groups: (1) local ones, which focus on a client’s current state, such as transaction forecasting, and (2) global ones, which consider the general customer behaviour, e.g., predicting successful loan repayment. Unfortunately, maintaining separate models for each task is costly. Therefore, to better facilitate information management, we compared eight state-of-the-art unsupervised methods on 11 tasks in search for a one-size-fits-all solution. Contrastive self-supervised learning methods were demonstrated to excel at global problems, while generative techniques were superior at local tasks. We also introduced a novel approach, which enriches the client’s representation by incorporating external information gathered from other clients. Our method outperforms classical models, boosting accuracy by up to 20%.
学习银行信息管理中的事务表示:掌握本地、全球和外部知识
在当今世界,银行利用人工智能来优化各种业务流程,旨在改善客户体验。大多数与客户相关的任务可以分为两组:(1)本地任务,关注客户的当前状态,如交易预测;(2)全局任务,考虑一般客户行为,如预测成功的贷款偿还。不幸的是,为每个任务维护单独的模型是昂贵的。因此,为了更好地促进信息管理,我们在11个任务上比较了8种最先进的无监督方法,以寻找一种通用的解决方案。对比式自我监督学习方法在全局问题上表现优异,而生成式学习方法在局部任务上表现优异。我们还引入了一种新颖的方法,通过结合从其他客户收集的外部信息来丰富客户的表现。我们的方法优于经典模型,将准确率提高了20%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信