A systematic evaluation of white-box explainable AI methods for anomaly detection in IoT systems

IF 6 3区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Anna N. Gummadi , Osvaldo Arreche , Mustafa Abdallah
{"title":"A systematic evaluation of white-box explainable AI methods for anomaly detection in IoT systems","authors":"Anna N. Gummadi ,&nbsp;Osvaldo Arreche ,&nbsp;Mustafa Abdallah","doi":"10.1016/j.iot.2025.101505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid evolution of Internet of Things (IoT) systems has created new avenues for studying how artificial intelligence (AI) might be used to improve anomaly detection in these systems. Using AI for finding and predicting abnormalities or malfunctions in IoT devices with precision is crucial to highlight the salient characteristics of these anomalies to save maintenance expenses and downtime. Pairing these AI-based anomaly detection methods with explanations will make them applicable in real-world IoT systems. However, the systematic evaluation of various explainable AI (XAI) strategies used for anomaly detection in IoT systems is still lacking. To help address this gap, we propose an evaluation framework for different white-box XAI techniques in which we consider six evaluation metrics that are essential for evaluating XAI methods and have mappings to AI and security domains. In particular, we use these metrics to evaluate Integrated Gradients (IG), Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP), and Deep Learning - SHAP (Deep-SHAP), through a single deep neural network (DNN) model. These metrics are descriptive accuracy, sparsity, stability, efficiency, robustness, and completeness. We used these six metrics to evaluate the three aforementioned white-box XAI methods considered in our work. Our evaluation framework is tested on two different IoT datasets: the N-BaIoT dataset, which focuses on detecting IoT botnet attacks on commercial IoT devices infected by the Mirai and Gafgyt botnets, and the MEMS dataset, which contains sensor data from manufacturing processes aimed at detecting abnormal readings. In the context of IoT systems, we illustrate the advantages and disadvantages of the state-of-the-art white-box XAI techniques through this study. Our evaluation framework’s source code is made accessible to the general public, providing a common benchmark for upcoming studies that explore applying explainable AI for enhancing anomaly detection in the emerging IoT field.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29968,"journal":{"name":"Internet of Things","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 101505"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet of Things","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542660525000186","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid evolution of Internet of Things (IoT) systems has created new avenues for studying how artificial intelligence (AI) might be used to improve anomaly detection in these systems. Using AI for finding and predicting abnormalities or malfunctions in IoT devices with precision is crucial to highlight the salient characteristics of these anomalies to save maintenance expenses and downtime. Pairing these AI-based anomaly detection methods with explanations will make them applicable in real-world IoT systems. However, the systematic evaluation of various explainable AI (XAI) strategies used for anomaly detection in IoT systems is still lacking. To help address this gap, we propose an evaluation framework for different white-box XAI techniques in which we consider six evaluation metrics that are essential for evaluating XAI methods and have mappings to AI and security domains. In particular, we use these metrics to evaluate Integrated Gradients (IG), Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP), and Deep Learning - SHAP (Deep-SHAP), through a single deep neural network (DNN) model. These metrics are descriptive accuracy, sparsity, stability, efficiency, robustness, and completeness. We used these six metrics to evaluate the three aforementioned white-box XAI methods considered in our work. Our evaluation framework is tested on two different IoT datasets: the N-BaIoT dataset, which focuses on detecting IoT botnet attacks on commercial IoT devices infected by the Mirai and Gafgyt botnets, and the MEMS dataset, which contains sensor data from manufacturing processes aimed at detecting abnormal readings. In the context of IoT systems, we illustrate the advantages and disadvantages of the state-of-the-art white-box XAI techniques through this study. Our evaluation framework’s source code is made accessible to the general public, providing a common benchmark for upcoming studies that explore applying explainable AI for enhancing anomaly detection in the emerging IoT field.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internet of Things
Internet of Things Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.10%
发文量
115
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Internet of Things; Engineering Cyber Physical Human Systems is a comprehensive journal encouraging cross collaboration between researchers, engineers and practitioners in the field of IoT & Cyber Physical Human Systems. The journal offers a unique platform to exchange scientific information on the entire breadth of technology, science, and societal applications of the IoT. The journal will place a high priority on timely publication, and provide a home for high quality. Furthermore, IOT is interested in publishing topical Special Issues on any aspect of IOT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信