Metaheuristic search algorithms in real-time charge scheduling optimisation: A suite of benchmark problems and research on stability-analysis

IF 7.8 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Applied Soft Computing Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.asoc.2025.112691
Furkan Üstünsoy , H.Hüseyin Sayan , Hamdi Tolga Kahraman
{"title":"Metaheuristic search algorithms in real-time charge scheduling optimisation: A suite of benchmark problems and research on stability-analysis","authors":"Furkan Üstünsoy ,&nbsp;H.Hüseyin Sayan ,&nbsp;Hamdi Tolga Kahraman","doi":"10.1016/j.asoc.2025.112691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The most important challenges in the optimization of real-time charging scheduling (CS) problems are (i) the need to model CS problems with a large number of decision variables for precise control, (ii) the increase in computational complexity with the high penetration of electric vehicles, and (iii) the lack of research on the stability and computation time of optimization algorithms on CS problems. In this paper, we design a real-time model and introduce the CS Benchmark Problems (CSBP) suite of twelve problems of four different types. Furthermore, a driver satisfaction model is introduced for the first time to analyse the impact of the results on user satisfaction. Best known solutions for all problems in CSBP are presented for the first time in this study. According to the statistical analysis results, the three competitive algorithms among 66 competitors in the optimization of CSs are LSHADE-CnEpSin, LSHADE-SPACMA and LRFDB-COA. Stability and computational complexity analyses revealed that LSHADE-SPACMA is the most successful algorithm for problems where consumers outnumber prosumer and LRFDB-COA is the most successful algorithm for problems where consumers equal or exceed prosumer. When the performance of the algorithms is evaluated regardless of the problem type, LSHADE-Spacma is the most stable algorithm with an overall success rate of 100 % on CSs. In addition, the average peak load shaving for the best known solutions of the algorithms with the highest success rate for each problem is calculated to be 94.84 %, and the average satisfaction score for all drivers is calculated to be 0.81.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50737,"journal":{"name":"Applied Soft Computing","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 112691"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Soft Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S156849462500002X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The most important challenges in the optimization of real-time charging scheduling (CS) problems are (i) the need to model CS problems with a large number of decision variables for precise control, (ii) the increase in computational complexity with the high penetration of electric vehicles, and (iii) the lack of research on the stability and computation time of optimization algorithms on CS problems. In this paper, we design a real-time model and introduce the CS Benchmark Problems (CSBP) suite of twelve problems of four different types. Furthermore, a driver satisfaction model is introduced for the first time to analyse the impact of the results on user satisfaction. Best known solutions for all problems in CSBP are presented for the first time in this study. According to the statistical analysis results, the three competitive algorithms among 66 competitors in the optimization of CSs are LSHADE-CnEpSin, LSHADE-SPACMA and LRFDB-COA. Stability and computational complexity analyses revealed that LSHADE-SPACMA is the most successful algorithm for problems where consumers outnumber prosumer and LRFDB-COA is the most successful algorithm for problems where consumers equal or exceed prosumer. When the performance of the algorithms is evaluated regardless of the problem type, LSHADE-Spacma is the most stable algorithm with an overall success rate of 100 % on CSs. In addition, the average peak load shaving for the best known solutions of the algorithms with the highest success rate for each problem is calculated to be 94.84 %, and the average satisfaction score for all drivers is calculated to be 0.81.
实时收费调度优化中的元启发式搜索算法:一套基准问题及稳定性分析研究
优化实时充电调度(CS)问题最重要的挑战是:(1)需要对具有大量决策变量的CS问题进行建模以进行精确控制;(2)随着电动汽车的高度普及,计算复杂度增加;(3)CS问题优化算法的稳定性和计算时间研究不足。在本文中,我们设计了一个实时模型,并引入了CS基准问题(CSBP)套件,其中包含四种不同类型的十二个问题。此外,首次引入了驾驶员满意度模型来分析结果对用户满意度的影响。本研究首次提出了CSBP中所有问题的最佳解决方案。统计分析结果显示,在66个竞争算法中,最具竞争力的3种算法分别是LSHADE-CnEpSin、LSHADE-SPACMA和LRFDB-COA。稳定性和计算复杂度分析表明,LSHADE-SPACMA算法是解决消费者数量大于prosumer问题的最成功算法,LRFDB-COA算法是解决消费者数量等于或超过prosumer问题的最成功算法。无论问题类型如何,当评估算法的性能时,LSHADE-Spacma是最稳定的算法,在CSs上的总体成功率为100% %。此外,计算出每个问题成功率最高的算法的最佳已知解的平均峰载剃须率为94.84 %,计算出所有驾驶员的平均满意度得分为0.81。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Soft Computing
Applied Soft Computing 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
874
审稿时长
10.9 months
期刊介绍: Applied Soft Computing is an international journal promoting an integrated view of soft computing to solve real life problems.The focus is to publish the highest quality research in application and convergence of the areas of Fuzzy Logic, Neural Networks, Evolutionary Computing, Rough Sets and other similar techniques to address real world complexities. Applied Soft Computing is a rolling publication: articles are published as soon as the editor-in-chief has accepted them. Therefore, the web site will continuously be updated with new articles and the publication time will be short.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书